Oppo Reno8 T vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 2, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 92.56 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 180 g 180 g
Height 160.8 mm 163.9 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black Starlight
  • Orange Sunset
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.43 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 409 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 430 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 120.93 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.02 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno8 TSamsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.8 x 73.8 x 7.8163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8M55 slightly larger; negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)180180Identical weight.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 90HzSuper AMOLED+, 120HzM55's 120Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations; both AMOLED types provide vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Display Size (inches)6.436.7M55 has a slightly larger screen, providing more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution; sharpness is comparable given similar screen sizes.
Peak Brightness (nits)8001000 (HBM)M55 significantly brighter, ensuring better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)M55's Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to its more advanced architecture and smaller node size.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)M55 has a more powerful and modern CPU architecture, resulting in faster app loading, multitasking, and smoother gaming.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 644M55 has a more capable GPU, resulting in better gaming performance and smoother graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)88Identical RAM; multitasking capabilities should be similar.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10850Reno8 T has a higher megapixel count; however, sensor size and other factors also impact image quality. We lack details for a comprehensive comparison.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with OIS, EISM55 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and optical image stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)6745Reno8 T charges faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno8 T Advantages:

  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster charging speeds.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially better detailed photos in ideal conditions (though other camera specs are missing).

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 provides a noticeable performance advantage in everyday tasks and gaming.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid user experience.
  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Superior Video Recording: 4K resolution with OIS provides significantly better video quality.
  • More Recent OS: Ships with Android 14, offering newer features and potentially longer software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno8 T: Users who prioritize fast charging and primarily use their phone for casual tasks, social media, and less demanding games. Budget-conscious users might find it appealing if priced competitively.

Samsung Galaxy M55: Users who value performance, a smooth and bright display, and good video recording capabilities. Suitable for mobile gamers, content creators, and users who multitask heavily.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The price difference might be a deciding factor.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? (Gaming, content consumption, photography, social media)
  3. How important is performance and display quality?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For a budget-conscious gamer: Consider the Reno8 T if the price difference is significant, but be aware of performance limitations. Otherwise, the M55 offers a much better gaming experience.
  • For a content creator: The M55 is a better choice due to its superior video recording and brighter display.
  • For a casual user: Either phone could be suitable, but the M55 provides a more future-proof platform with better overall performance.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

Reasons:

The Samsung Galaxy M55 offers a significantly superior overall package. While the Oppo Reno8 T boasts faster charging and a higher megapixel main camera, the M55's advantages in performance, display quality, video recording capabilities, and a more recent operating system outweigh these benefits. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 provides a noticeably better user experience for demanding tasks and gaming. The 120Hz display is smoother and more responsive, and the brighter screen ensures better visibility outdoors. Moreover, the M55's 4K video recording with OIS is a significant advantage for content creation. Although we lack complete camera specifications, the core advantages of the M55 make it a more compelling choice for a broader range of users. Finally, the newer Android version suggests longer-term software updates and support.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.