Oppo Reno8 Pro vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 19, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 87.32 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 183 g 189 g
Height 161.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.2 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Glazed Green
  • Glazed Black
  • House of the Dragon
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.3 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 950 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.54 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Oppo Reno8 Pro vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Comparative Deep Dive

The smartphone market offers a dizzying array of choices, and deciding between two seemingly similar devices can be challenging. Today, we'll dissect the Oppo Reno8 Pro and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, two phones occupying different price tiers but both vying for your attention. By translating complex specifications into real-world implications, we'll empower you to choose the device that best aligns with your needs and budget.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo Reno8 ProZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Reno8 Pro is noticeably slimmer and more pocketable.
Weight (g)183189Negligible difference in weight; both feel comfortable in hand.
Display
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz refresh rateIPS LCD, 90Hz refresh rateReno8 Pro offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling thanks to AMOLED technology and faster refresh rate.
Resolution1080 x 2412720 x 1612Reno8 Pro boasts significantly sharper visuals. A75's lower resolution may result in pixelation.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Reno8 Pro's more advanced chipset delivers significantly faster performance in demanding tasks and games.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.85 GHz & 4x2.0 GHz)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz)Reno8 Pro offers superior processing power, leading to smoother multitasking and app responsiveness.
RAM8GB/12GB4GB/8GBMore RAM in Reno8 Pro enables effortless multitasking and seamless switching between apps.
Camera
Main Camera50MP Sony IMX76650MP ISOCELLBoth offer high megapixel counts, but image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and lens quality. Real-world photo comparisons are needed.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps, 720p@960fps1080p@30fpsReno8 Pro offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and slow-motion options.
Battery Life
Capacity4500 mAh5000 mAhBlade A75 offers a larger battery capacity, potentially translating to longer usage time.
Fast Charging80W22.5WReno8 Pro charges significantly faster.
PriceMediumLowBlade A75 is significantly more affordable.

2. Key Insights

The Oppo Reno8 Pro is a clear performance leader. Its powerful Dimensity 8100 Max chipset, coupled with ample RAM and a vibrant 120Hz AMOLED display, delivers a premium user experience. The superior camera system promises better image and video quality, although real-world testing is needed to confirm this. Fast charging ensures minimal downtime.

The ZTE Blade A75 4G prioritizes affordability and long battery life. While its performance is less impressive, it should handle everyday tasks adequately. The 50MP main camera could surprise, but the overall camera system lacks the advanced features of the Reno8 Pro.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Reno8 Pro: Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a capable camera system. Gamers, content creators, and multitaskers will appreciate its speed and responsiveness.

Blade A75 4G: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and basic functionality. Casual users who primarily use their phones for communication, social media, and light web browsing will find it a viable option.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Ask Yourself:

  1. What's your budget? The price difference is substantial.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Demanding tasks or basic functionality?
  3. Which features are non-negotiable? Performance, display quality, battery life, or camera capabilities?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user: Reno8 Pro for its superior performance and features.
  • Light user on a budget: Blade A75 4G offers good value for its price.
  • Gamer: Reno8 Pro for smooth gameplay and a vibrant display.

My Choice: The Oppo Reno8 Pro

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers tempting value, the Oppo Reno8 Pro's performance and display are decisive factors for me. I value a smooth, responsive user experience, especially for multitasking and content creation. The superior camera system and significantly faster charging are compelling bonuses. While the price premium is notable, the Reno8 Pro delivers a tangible upgrade in key areas that significantly enhance daily usage. The slimmer design and lighter weight are also preferable for me. I'm willing to invest in a device that offers a more enjoyable and productive mobile experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.