Oppo Reno12 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 25, 2024 September 4, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 90.89 cm³ 118.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.79 "/g 3.11 "/g
Weight 177 g 257 g
Height 161.4 mm 155.2 mm
Width 74.1 mm 150.2 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 5.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Matte Brown
  • Sunset Pink
  • Astro Silver
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 2076 x 2152
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.3 % 88.5 %
Pixel Density 394 PPI 373 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 2700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 72.66 mAh/in²
Battery Density 55.01 mAh/cm³ 39.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4650 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G615 MC2 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Reno12Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.4 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1 mmPixel 9 Pro Fold is wider and taller when unfolded but significantly thinner due to its foldable design. Reno12 is more pocketable in traditional sense.
Weight177g257gPixel 9 Pro Fold is noticeably heavier, impacting one-handed use and portability.
FoldableNoYesPixel offers a larger screen real estate when unfolded, enabling multitasking and content consumption on a larger display. Reno12 offers a traditional smartphone experience.
Display
Size6.7"8" (unfolded)Pixel offers a significantly larger screen area when unfolded, beneficial for media consumption and multitasking.
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzFoldable LTPO OLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to 120Hz. LTPO on Pixel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Resolution1080 x 24122076 x 2152Pixel has a sharper display due to higher resolution, especially noticeable when unfolded.
Peak Brightness1200 nits2700 nitsPixel's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)Tensor G4 is likely to offer superior performance, especially in AI tasks, given Google's focus on AI processing.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)Tensor G4's core configuration suggests better performance for demanding tasks compared to Dimensity 7300.
RAM12GB16GBMore RAM in Pixel allows for smoother multitasking and better handling of memory-intensive applications.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 960fps slow-motionUp to 240fps slow-motionReno12 offers higher frame rate slow-motion video recording options. Specific camera sensor details are missing, hindering a full comparison.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4650 mAhReno12 has a slightly larger battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on various factors including display size and usage patterns. Foldable displays generally consume more power.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Reno12 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Expected to be significantly cheaper given the "medium price" range.
  • Lighter and More Pocketable: Easier to carry and use one-handed.
  • Higher Frame Rate Slow Motion: Offers more dramatic slow-motion video capture.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Advantages:

  • Larger, Foldable Display: Provides a tablet-like experience for productivity and media consumption.
  • More Powerful Processor and RAM: Offers better performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
  • Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility.
  • Longer Software Support: Pixel phones typically receive longer OS and security updates.

Trade-offs:

  • Price vs. Features: Pixel's advanced features come at a significantly higher price.
  • Portability vs. Screen Size: Reno12 prioritizes portability while Pixel prioritizes screen real estate.
  • Battery Life: Larger display and foldable mechanism might impact Pixel's battery life despite LTPO technology.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Reno12:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users seeking a reliable smartphone with a good display and solid performance for everyday tasks.
  • Use Cases: Social media, web browsing, light gaming, casual photography, video recording.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold:

  • Ideal User: Power users and early adopters who value a large, foldable display for productivity and multimedia consumption and are willing to pay a premium.
  • Use Cases: Multitasking, demanding applications, media consumption, content creation, showcasing innovative technology.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend on a smartphone?
  2. Screen Size and Portability: Do you prioritize a large screen for productivity and media or a more pocketable device?
  3. Performance Needs: Do you need a powerful device for demanding tasks or is a mid-range performance sufficient?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Everyday Use: Oppo Reno12
  • Power User, Multitasking Focus: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • Large Screen for Media, Moderate Budget: Consider other non-folding large screen options (information not provided in the current data).
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.