Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 100.48 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.47 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 193 g 188 g
Height 163.6 mm 166.3 mm
Width 74 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gloss Black
  • Cosmic Mocha
  • Mars Edition
  • Photographer Edition
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1440 x 3216 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.2 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 525 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.78 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. Motorola Moto G35

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 ProMotorola Moto G35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.6 × 74 × 8.3 mm166.3 × 76 × 7.8 mmMotorola is slightly taller and wider but thinner. Oppo Find X3 Pro might feel more substantial and less slippery, while Moto G35 is slightly more compact.
Weight193g188gNegligible difference in weight. Both will feel similar in hand.
Display
Size6.7"6.72"Virtually identical screen sizes, almost no noticeable difference.
Resolution1440x32161080x2400Oppo has significantly sharper visuals. Text and images will appear much clearer than on the Moto G35, especially for reading and detailed content.
Pixel Density (PPI)525392Oppo provides a crisper, more detailed display. Moto G35 may appear less sharp.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDOppo's display has superior contrast and color accuracy, with true blacks and potentially better viewing angles, especially in darker rooms or dark mode.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations; similar perceived fluidity.
Brightness1300 nits1000 nitsOppo's screen is much more readable in direct sunlight. Moto G35 may be harder to see on a sunny day.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Unisoc T760 (6 nm)Oppo offers substantially faster performance, better for demanding games, multitasking, and resource-intensive applications. Moto G35 is adequate for day to day tasks.
AnTuTu Score876,500423,297The Find X3 Pro offers a much smoother and more responsive experience, especially with gaming or heavy multitasking.
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G57Oppo has much higher graphical capabilities, leading to better gaming performance and smoother UI transitions.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMoto G35 likely offers longer battery life on a single charge because of larger capacity.
Charging65W fast charging18W fast chargingOppo charges significantly faster, reducing charging time. Motorola charging will be much slower.
Features30W wireless charging, Reverse wireless chargingNon-removableOppo offers convenient wireless charging, and can even charge other devices wirelessly
Camera
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" sensor, Sony IMX766, 1.00 µm pixels50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor, Samsung S5KJN1, 0.64 µm pixelsOppo's larger sensor captures more light, potentially leading to better low-light performance and overall better image quality.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" sensor, Sony IMX615, 0.80 µm pixels16MP, f/2.45, Unknown sensor, Unknown pixelsOppo's front camera has more megapixels and a slightly wider aperture, which may lead to better selfies with more detail, especially in lower light.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" sensor, Samsung S5K3M5, 1.00 µm pixelsN/AOppo offers optical zoom capabilities and a dedicated telephoto camera. Moto G35 lacks this functionality.
Wide-Angle Lens50MP, f/2.2, 1/1.56" sensor, Sony IMX766, 1.00 µm pixels8MP, f/2.2, Unknown sensor, 1.12 µm pixelsOppo offers a higher resolution wide-angle lens with a larger sensor for better wide-angle photography.
Video4K@60fps with HDR, EIS4K@30fpsOppo has more video options such as 60fps at 4k resolution, and more advanced EIS capabilities.
DxoMarkMobile: 128Not TestedOppo Find X3 Pro has a significantly better camera according to DxOMark testing.
FeaturesOIS, Quad Camera, RAWDual CameraOppo offers a more versatile camera system with optical image stabilization, more sensors and RAW image capture.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 14)Android 14Moto G35 has the latest Android OS out of the box with a more updated user experience.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)802.11acOppo has faster and more efficient Wi-Fi capabilities.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.0Oppo offers a newer Bluetooth standard with more advanced audio codecs.
GPSGPS (L1+L5)GPSOppo offers more precise GPS for location services with dual-band support.
SIMDual SIM (Nano + Nano)Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM)Moto G35 has eSIM for digital carrier switching. Oppo supports two physical SIMs
Storage
Internal256GB or 512GB128GB or 256GBOppo offers more storage options for users who need more space.
RAM12GB or 16GB4GB or 8GBOppo has significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and faster app loading, especially for demanding users.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports external storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesMoto G35 might offer slightly better audio recording due to dual microphones, but both have good audio quality.
Security
FeaturesBasic fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprint sensorMotorola’s side-mounted scanner is a little more convenient, while the basic fingerprint sensor for Oppo is unspecified and might not be as reliable.
Build Quality
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 3Oppo offers better screen protection and scratch resistance.
Sensors
SensorsGravity, PedometerNoneOppo comes with more sensors that can be used for gaming and other apps.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, pixel density, and AMOLED technology result in a much sharper and vibrant display experience.
  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset offers much faster processing and gaming capabilities compared to the Unisoc chipset.
  • Advanced Camera System: Better main camera sensor, dedicated telephoto lens, higher resolution wide-angle, and better video recording capabilities, leading to superior overall camera performance.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging and wireless charging offer greater convenience and shorter charging times.
  • More RAM and Storage: Provides smoother multitasking and more storage for media and files, especially for users who need the capacity.
  • Advanced connectivity: Faster Wi-Fi, more accurate GPS and better Bluetooth audio.
  • Better Build Quality: Gorilla Glass 5 offers better protection than Gorilla Glass 3.

Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:

  • Newer OS out of the box: Ships with Android 14, offering the latest features and software experience.
  • Larger Battery: Slightly larger battery capacity which could lead to longer battery life.
  • eSIM support: eSIM capability, allowing for more flexible carrier switching.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Likely to be more budget-friendly than the Oppo Find X3 Pro.
  • 2 microphones: Slightly better audio quality due to dual microphones

Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Pro is older, potentially impacting software support, but offers significantly better specifications.
  • The Motorola Moto G35 provides a more modern software experience and might have longer battery life but compromises on display, performance, and camera quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Pro is ideal for:

  • Power Users: Those who need top-tier performance for gaming, demanding apps, and multitasking.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality and need a versatile camera system.
  • Media Consumers: Those who enjoy watching high-resolution videos and want the best possible display experience.
  • Users who need fast charging: Those who need short charging times, and wireless charging.

Specific Use Cases for Oppo Find X3 Pro:

  • Gaming at high graphic settings with smooth performance.
  • Professional photography and video recording with better image quality and zoom capabilities.
  • Watching high-definition videos or movies on a vibrant display with sharp text for reading.
  • Demanding multitasking on apps like video editing or graphics.

Motorola Moto G35 is ideal for:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Users who are seeking a functional smartphone at an affordable price.
  • Casual Users: Those who primarily use their phone for basic tasks, social media, and light browsing.
  • Users Prioritizing Battery Life: Users who need to prioritize battery life and a modern software experience over raw performance.
  • Users who prefer eSIM functionality Those who like to digitally switch carriers.

Specific Use Cases for Motorola Moto G35:

  • Basic web browsing, social media use, and communication.
  • Daily tasks such as checking emails, messaging, and listening to music.
  • Users who want a phone that's easy to use with a newer version of Android.
  • Users who prioritize battery life over other things.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Pro provides flagship-level specs with a high price.
  • The Motorola Moto G35 is designed to offer a solid performance in a budget-friendly package, but compromises on the display, performance, and camera.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Oppo Find X3 Pro will be significantly more expensive.
  2. How important is performance? If you want to game, multitask, or use demanding apps, the Oppo is a better choice.
  3. How much do you value camera quality? The Oppo has a superior camera system.
  4. Do you need wireless charging? If the answer is yes, Oppo Find X3 Pro is the only option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Gaming and Multimedia:
    • Recommendation: Oppo Find X3 Pro. Its superior performance, display, and audio make it far better for gaming and consuming media.
  • Scenario 2: Photography:
    • Recommendation: Oppo Find X3 Pro. The better sensors, lenses, and features make it better for taking pictures.
  • Scenario 3: Basic Usage with Limited Budget:
    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G35. It offers a modern OS and is suitable for basic tasks.
  • Scenario 4: Needs an eSIM
    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G35. It is the only phone to offer eSIM functionality

Personal Choice

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Oppo Find X3 Pro.

Reasoning:

While the Motorola Moto G35 is newer and has a larger battery and newer OS, the performance, display, and camera of the Oppo Find X3 Pro are substantially superior. As someone who values a premium experience and frequently uses their phone for tasks like photography, gaming, and multimedia consumption, the Oppo is a far better fit for my needs. I am willing to sacrifice a bit of battery life and a newer OS for the benefits that the Find X3 Pro offers. The improved visual quality of the AMOLED display and the advanced camera capabilities would make a noticeable difference in my daily use, and the wireless charging is an added convenience. Although the Find X3 Pro is older, the quality difference from the Moto G35 is substantial.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.