Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Google Pixel 6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 October 28, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 110.72 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 184 g 210 g
Height 159.9 mm 163.9 mm
Width 72.5 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Stormy Black
  • Cloudy White
  • Sorta Sunny

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1440 x 3120
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 88.6 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 512 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 111.45 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 45.19 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5003 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Google Tensor (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G78 MP20

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoGoogle Pixel 6 ProPractical Impact
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm163.9 × 75.9 × 8.9 mmPixel 6 Pro is noticeably larger and slightly thicker, may be less comfortable for small hands.
Weight184g210gFind X3 Neo is significantly lighter, easier to hold for extended periods.
BuildCorning Gorilla Glass 5 (Screen)Corning Gorilla Glass Victus (Screen)Pixel 6 Pro has significantly more robust screen protection.
FoldableStandardStandardBoth are standard, non-folding phones

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoGoogle Pixel 6 ProPractical Impact
Size6.55"6.7"Pixel 6 Pro has a slightly larger display for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001440x3120Pixel 6 Pro offers sharper visuals and crisper text.
PPI402512Pixel 6 Pro has a higher pixel density, resulting in a noticeably sharper and clearer display.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, but display quality varies due to other factors.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzPixel 6 Pro offers slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsFind X3 Neo is significantly better for use in direct sunlight (Pixel 6 Pro brightness data missing).

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoGoogle Pixel 6 ProPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7nm+)Google Tensor (5nm)Different architectures, Google Tensor is focused on AI tasks, Snapdragon 865 is good for gaming and general tasks.
AnTuTu Score743,500721,000Similar overall performance for everyday use, but minor differences in real-world tasks.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G78 MP20Different GPUs, affecting gaming performance variably based on the specific game.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoGoogle Pixel 6 ProPractical Impact
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", IMX76650MP, f/1.85, 1/1.31", GN1Pixel 6 Pro has a larger sensor, potentially capturing more light and detail.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", IMX61512MP, f/2.2, 1/2.93", IMX663Find X3 Neo has higher resolution; Pixel 6 Pro has wider aperture and bigger pixels, likely better low light selfies.
Telephoto13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4", S5K3M548MP, f/3.5, 1/2", IMX586Pixel 6 Pro has much higher resolution and larger sensor, offering significantly better zoom capabilities.
Wide Angle16MP, f/2.212MP, f/2.2, 1/2.9", IMX386Find X3 Neo has higher resolution, Pixel 6 Pro has larger pixel size.
Macro2MP, f/2.4, 1/5"NoneFind X3 Neo has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots.
Video4K@60fps, EIS4K@60fps, OIS, EISPixel 6 Pro has optical image stabilization, for smoother video, while find x3 has Electronic image stabilization.
DXOMark (Main)106134Pixel 6 Pro excels in overall camera performance based on DxOMark score.
DXOMark (Selfie)N/A138Pixel 6 Pro has a highly rated front-facing camera, while the X3 Neo was not tested.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoGoogle Pixel 6 ProPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhPixel 6 Pro should offer longer battery life due to larger capacity.
Charging65W, Li-Polymer30W, Li-IonFind X3 Neo charges much faster, minimizing downtime.
FeaturesReverse charging, Non-removableReverse charging, Non-removable, 23W Wireless chargingPixel 6 Pro supports wireless charging, offering convenient charging options.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Significantly Lighter: The 26g weight difference makes it much more comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging drastically reduces charging time, offering significant convenience for users on the go.
  • Dedicated Macro Lens: The inclusion of a macro lens allows for close-up photography, which the Pixel 6 Pro lacks.
  • Higher Brightness: 1100 nits brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility even in direct sunlight.

Google Pixel 6 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Camera System: Larger main camera sensor, significantly better telephoto lens, and high-scoring DXOMark results result in superior image quality, especially in zoom and low-light conditions.
  • Higher Resolution Display: The combination of higher resolution and pixel density provides a significantly sharper and clearer display experience.
  • Smoother Refresh Rate: 120Hz refresh rate enhances the visual fluidity of the display.
  • Larger Battery: The 500mAh larger battery capacity translates to better battery life.
  • Wireless Charging: Offers convenient wireless charging capabilities.
  • Superior Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus provides better scratch resistance and drop protection.
  • Software Support: Newer Android version and longer software updates.

Trade-offs:

  • The Find X3 Neo sacrifices the advanced camera capabilities and display clarity of the Pixel 6 Pro for a lighter build and faster charging.
  • The Pixel 6 Pro, while superior in many aspects, is bulkier, heavier, and lacks the extremely fast charging of the Find X3 Neo.
  • The Pixel 6 Pro's screen brightness specification is missing, making it difficult to compare real-world visibility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo Ideal User:

  • Users Seeking Lightweight Phones: Prioritize comfort and ease of use for extended periods.
  • Users Needing Fast Charging: Value minimal charging downtime and convenient top-ups.
  • Users Interested in Macro Photography: Enjoy capturing detailed close-up shots.
  • Users in Bright Environments: Require a very bright display for easy viewing outdoors.
  • Budget-Conscious Users: Looking for great value in a flagship phone.

Use Cases:

  • Frequent commuters and travelers who need a light phone with quick charging.
  • Users who prefer a comfortable, easily handheld phone for daily tasks.
  • Hobbyist photographers who enjoy creative macro shots.
  • Users who are frequently outdoors during the day.

Google Pixel 6 Pro Ideal User:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Prioritize the best possible image quality and advanced camera features.
  • Users Prioritizing Display Quality: Value sharp, clear, and visually appealing displays.
  • Users Wanting Future-Proof Phones: Desire extended software support and the latest Android features.
  • Power Users: Use their phones extensively and need long battery life and smooth performance.
  • Users Wanting Wireless Charging: Prefer the convenience of wireless charging pads.
  • Users Wanting Better screen Protection: Want their phone to be protected from scratches and accidental drops.

Use Cases:

  • Professional photographers or social media influencers who require top-tier camera quality.
  • Users who consume a lot of multimedia content and appreciate a high-resolution display.
  • Users who rely on their phones heavily and require the latest software updates.
  • Users who prefer premium protection against accidents.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Ask Before Deciding:

  1. Do you prioritize a lightweight phone with extremely fast charging, or a larger phone with a superior camera and screen?
  2. Is top-tier camera performance crucial for your needs, or is a versatile, good enough camera acceptable?
  3. How important are a sharp high-resolution display, extended software support and superior screen protection to you, versus a brighter screen and macro camera?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Frequent Traveler: If you prioritize a light phone, extremely fast charging and a bright display for travel, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the better option.
  • Scenario 2: Photography Enthusiast: If you need the best camera and prefer an excellent display for image editing and viewing, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 3: Budget-Conscious User: If you're looking for better value for your money, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the better pick, provided that you don't need top-of-the-line camera capabilities.
  • Scenario 4: Outdoor User: If you frequently use your phone in bright environments, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is a much better choice due to the significantly brighter screen.

My Choice

If I were to choose, I would personally pick the Google Pixel 6 Pro.

Reasoning:

While the Oppo Find X3 Neo's fast charging and lightweight design are tempting, the superior camera system, higher-resolution display, longer software support, and overall premium build quality of the Pixel 6 Pro outweigh those advantages for me. I am heavily invested in photography and value a high-quality display for content consumption, making the Pixel 6 Pro a better fit for my needs. The Pixel 6 Pro's superior screen protection also makes it better suited for my needs as I tend to drop phones from time to time. Although the Find X3 Neo has a dedicated macro camera and slightly better brightness, the benefits of the Pixel 6 Pro's main and telephoto camera, especially when it comes to low-light photos and zooming far outweighs the benefits of the macro lens. While it's heavier and charges slower, these trade-offs are acceptable for the substantially improved overall experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.