Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 April 14, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 111.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.03 "/g
Weight 184 g 224 g
Height 159.9 mm 163.8 mm
Width 72.5 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Eternal Black
  • Skyline Blue
  • Misty Gray
  • Desert Sand

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 88.2 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 388 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits 2500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 119.65 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 49.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoAsus Zenfone 11 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9 mmThe Asus is larger and slightly thicker, making it less pocketable but potentially more comfortable for those with larger hands.
Weight184g224gThe Oppo is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. The Asus is heavier, which can feel more substantial.
Display
Size6.55"6.78"The Asus has a slightly larger screen, providing more immersive viewing for videos and games.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both displays are equally sharp.
PPI402388Both displays offer similar pixel density; very sharp for daily use.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth displays have excellent contrast and vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate90Hz144HzThe Asus offers significantly smoother scrolling and animations. The Oppo's display still feels responsive but is less fluid.
Brightness1100 nits2500 nitsThe Asus display is significantly brighter, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility even in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)The Asus chipset is significantly more powerful, enabling faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
AnTuTu Score743,5001,532,000The Asus has nearly double the benchmark score, showing a major performance advantage in demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 750The Asus has a much more powerful GPU, leading to better graphics performance in games and demanding apps.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5500mAhThe Asus has a considerably larger battery, which should translate to longer usage time, especially with heavy use.
Charging65W65WBoth phones offer fast charging that can quickly top up the battery.
FeaturesReverse Charging15W Wireless, 10W ReverseThe Asus has more versatile charging options with wireless charging, whereas Oppo only supports reverse wired charging.
Camera
Standard50MP f/1.8, IMX76650MP f/1.9, IMX890Both phones have capable main cameras; Oppo has wider aperture; Asus has better sensor.
Selfie32MP f/2.4, 1/2.74" IMX61532MP f/2.5, 1/3.2" OV32CThe Oppo selfie camera has a wider aperture and larger sensor which results in better low light performance.
Telephoto13MP f/2.4, 1/3.4" S5K3M532MP f/2.4Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a much higher resolution telephoto lens, offering better clarity in zoomed shots.
Wide Angle16MP f/2.213MP f/2.2 1.12 µmOppo offers a slightly higher resolution wide-angle lens.
Macro2MP f/2.4, 1/5" GC02M1NoneThe Oppo has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots; the Asus lacks one.
Video4K@60fps HDR, EIS8K@24fps HDR, EISThe Asus offers higher video resolution (8K) as well as higher frame rates for slow motion video, appealing to videographers.
DXOMarkMain: 106, Photo: 104, Video: 106Main: 125, Photo: 131, Video: 115The Asus has significantly better photo and video capabilities, scoring higher across the board.
Camera FeaturesQuadruple Camera, OISTriple Camera, Gimbal, OISThe Asus uses gimbal stabilization, and offers more camera features, while the Oppo uses quadruple camera setup.
Software
OSAndroid 11, Max 12Android 14, Max 16The Asus has a newer OS and longer update support, offering more features, security patches, and better software optimization.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6WiFi 7The Asus has faster and more efficient WiFi, with support for the latest standards.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1 LEBluetooth 5.4 LEThe Asus has newer Bluetooth, providing better connectivity and battery efficiency.
GPSMultiple satellite systemsMore advanced satellite systemsThe Asus offers greater accuracy due to support for more satellite systems.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIMBoth support dual SIMs.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB256/512 GBThe Asus offers higher storage capacities for users with larger libraries of media.
RAM12 GB12/16 GBThe Asus offers more RAM on one of its variants, improving multitasking and performance with demanding apps.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports storage expansion.
Audio
QualityHi-Res, Stereo SpeakersHi-Res, Stereo, 2 micsAsus offers active noise cancellation, which improves the quality of calls and audio recording, as well as a second microphone.
Security
FeaturesFingerprint sensorFingerprint sensorBoth phones offer similar fingerprint sensor technology for basic biometric security.
Build Quality
ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass Victus 2The Asus has more robust screen protection against drops and scratches.
SensorsPedometerHall, PedometerThe Asus has Hall sensor, which enables more advanced use cases for magnetic field sensing, while the Oppo only has a pedometer sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended handheld use.
  • Wider Aperture Selfie Camera: Better low-light performance for selfies.
  • Dedicated Macro Lens: Allows for close-up photography.
  • Slightly wider aperture on main camera: May have slight advantage in low light photography.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset offers dramatically improved speed and responsiveness.
  • Smoother Display: 144Hz refresh rate offers superior scrolling and gaming.
  • Brighter Display: Better visibility in direct sunlight.
  • Larger Battery: Longer battery life, especially with demanding use.
  • Superior Main Camera Sensor: More advanced sensor for better image quality.
  • Significantly Higher Telephoto Camera Resolution: Better zoom quality with higher megapixels.
  • Advanced Video Recording: 8K video capabilities and better slow-motion features.
  • Newer Software and Updates: Runs on Android 14 with the promise of two more updates, offers more features and security patches.
  • Faster WiFi 7: Latest connectivity standard for speed and performance.
  • More Advanced GPS: More precise location tracking.
  • Wireless Charging: Versatile battery charging options.
  • Noise cancellation microphone: For clearer calls and audio.
  • Gimbal Stabilization: For superior video stabilization, which is a big advantage for videography.
  • Stronger Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus 2 provides better scratch and drop resistance.
  • More RAM option: A variant with 16 GB of RAM that improves multitasking and overall performance.

Trade-offs:

  • The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra is larger and heavier than the Oppo Find X3 Neo which is less comfortable for prolonged handheld use or small hands.
  • The Oppo lacks wireless charging, the latest Wi-Fi and Bluetooth and its performance is significantly lower.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize a lightweight and comfortable design.
  • Users who occasionally use their phone for photography, particularly selfies and close-ups.
  • Budget-conscious buyers who don't need the latest processor or cutting-edge features.
  • Users looking for a reliable daily driver with a good display and a decent camera.

Use Cases:

  • Everyday browsing, social media, and communication.
  • Casual photography for social sharing.
  • Light gaming and media consumption.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Ideal User:

  • Power users who demand top-tier performance.
  • Mobile gamers who want a smooth and responsive experience.
  • Users who prioritize a large, bright, and fluid display.
  • Users who often shoot videos with demanding stabilization features.
  • Tech enthusiasts who want the latest features and connectivity standards.
  • Users who need a long-lasting battery.

Use Cases:

  • Demanding mobile gaming and content creation.
  • Professional or semi-professional photography and videography.
  • Heavy multitasking and productivity tasks.
  • Outdoor use in bright sunlight.
  • Users who want the latest technology on their phone.

Price-to-Value:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Neo likely offers a better price-to-value ratio for casual users due to its age, although this needs to be considered against the significant performance and feature advantages of the Asus.
  • The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, while likely more expensive, justifies the cost for users who need top performance and cutting-edge features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance Needs: Do I need the latest processor and maximum performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, or is good, reliable performance sufficient?
  2. Battery Life: Is long battery life a priority, or do I usually have easy access to charging options?
  3. Camera Usage: Is video and low light performance paramount, or are casual photos my main priority?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Casual User: If you primarily use your phone for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is a decent, lighter option.
  • Scenario 2: Performance and Gaming: If you need a powerhouse for gaming, heavy apps, and multitasking, the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra is the superior choice.
  • Scenario 3: Content Creation: If you shoot a lot of video and require advanced stabilization, the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra is the more capable option.
  • Scenario 4: Battery-Focused: If you often spend long days away from a charger and prioritize battery life, the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra's larger battery is much more convenient.

My Choice

I would choose the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra. While the Oppo Find X3 Neo has some merits, particularly its lighter weight and slightly better selfie camera, the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra represents a substantial upgrade in almost every critical area.

The significantly better performance of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, combined with the smoother 144Hz display and the larger battery, make it a much more compelling device for my needs. The advantages in camera performance, especially the vastly improved telephoto lens, gimbal stabilization, and video capabilities, are significant for any user who values mobile photography. The support for the latest connectivity standards (WiFi 7, Bluetooth 5.4) and the more recent software are also important factors for future-proofing.

While the slightly larger size and weight are a trade-off, the overall user experience provided by the Asus far outweighs those disadvantages. The Zenfone 11 Ultra is simply the superior device for anyone who wants a flagship smartphone capable of handling any demanding task while providing an immersive user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.