Oppo A55 vs Nothing CMF Phone 1 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo

General

Launch Date October 1, 2021 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 104.03 cm³ 103.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 193 g 197 g
Height 163.6 mm 164 mm
Width 75.7 mm 77 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue
  • Black
  • Orange
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.51 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.6 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.98 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.06 mAh/cm³ 48.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Oppo A55 vs. Nothing CMF Phone 1: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the spec sheet, focusing on how their features translate into real-world experiences. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison of the Oppo A55 and the Nothing CMF Phone 1.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A55Nothing CMF Phone 1User Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (based on Android 11)Nothing OS 2.0 (based on Android 14)CMF Phone 1 offers a potentially more modern and feature-rich software experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigationPotentially customized gestures and animationsCMF Phone 1 might offer a more unique and tailored user experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsPotentially enhanced accessibility featuresCMF Phone 1's newer OS version may offer improved accessibility features.
Design Ergonomics193g, 8.4mm thick197g, 8.2mm thickNegligible difference in hand feel; both are relatively lightweight and slim.
Display6.51" IPS LCD, 720x16006.67" AMOLED, 1080x2400, 120HzCMF Phone 1 boasts a significantly superior display with vibrant colors, higher resolution, and smoother refresh rate. This drastically improves media consumption, gaming, and overall visual experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student using your phone for both studying and entertainment.

  • Oppo A55: You can comfortably take notes and read articles, but the lower resolution display might make it less enjoyable for watching videos or playing graphics-intensive games. The long battery life ensures you can get through a full day of classes without needing a recharge.

  • Nothing CMF Phone 1: The vibrant AMOLED display and 120Hz refresh rate bring your study materials and entertainment to life. Scrolling through documents is smoother, and videos are more immersive. The faster processor handles multitasking with ease, allowing you to seamlessly switch between apps. You might however, miss having NFC for quick contactless payments, a feature the A55 offers.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy User: The CMF Phone 1 will appeal to users who appreciate cutting-edge technology, a fluid user interface, and a superior display.

  • Budget-Conscious User: The Oppo A55 provides a decent smartphone experience at a more affordable price point. It also includes NFC for contactless payments which might be crucial for some users.

  • User with Accessibility Needs: Both phones offer standard Android accessibility features. However, the CMF Phone 1's newer Android version may provide more comprehensive options.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Oppo A55 prioritizes affordability and essential functionality. The Nothing CMF Phone 1 focuses on delivering a premium user experience with its superior display and performance, but compromises on NFC functionality.

My Choice: I would choose the Nothing CMF Phone 1. While the Oppo A55 offers good value, the CMF Phone 1's significantly better display and performance are compelling. The smooth 120Hz AMOLED screen elevates everyday interactions, making everything from web browsing to gaming more enjoyable. The newer processor ensures a fluid user experience, which is crucial for a satisfying smartphone experience in the long run. The lack of NFC is a drawback, but for me, the overall user experience offered by the CMF Phone 1 outweighs this inconvenience. It aligns more closely with my focus on user-centered design and a holistic approach to technology.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.