Oppo A53 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A53
Oppo A53
Oppo

General

Launch Date August 25, 2020 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 103.39 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 186 g 193 g
Height 163.9 mm 168.3 mm
Width 75.1 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fairy White
  • Electric Black
  • Fancy Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 500 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.36 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 610 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version 11

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo A53 vs. Xiaomi Redmi A3

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Redmi A3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm, 186g168.3 × 76.3 × 8.3 mm, 193gRedmi A3 is slightly larger and heavier, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use.
Build QualityUnknown screen protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Redmi A3 has better screen protection against scratches and minor impacts.
Display
Size6.5"6.71"Redmi A3 offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption.
Resolution720x1600720x1650Both are HD+, expect similar sharpness. Fine for basic use, but not ideal for detailed content viewing.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smoother scrolling and animations compared to standard 60Hz displays.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsCannot compare brightness due to missing values. It will affect outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 460 (11nm)Helio G36 (12nm)Redmi A3 offers significantly better performance for gaming, multitasking, and overall responsiveness based on AnTuTu scores.
AnTuTu Score34,985127,000Redmi A3 will feel much faster in daily use.
GPUAdreno 610PowerVR GE8320Redmi A3's GPU is likely better suited for modern games, but details depend on specific game optimization.
RAM2GB/4GB3GB/4GB/6GBRedmi A3 with 4GB or 6GB RAM will handle multitasking better than the A53, especially the 2GB variant.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06" sensor8MP, f/2.0, Unknown sensor sizeOppo A53 has a higher resolution sensor but sensor size is not available for Redmi A3. The Redmi A3 may perform better in low light because of the wider aperture, but sensor size is crucial.
Selfie Camera5MP5MP, f/2.2Similar selfie camera performance.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record video at the same quality. The presence of video stabilization is a key factor for usability.
Camera FeaturesDigital Image StabilizationDual camera, Manual focus, Face detectionRedmi A3 has more comprehensive camera features and manual controls, although not always decisive.
DxOMark ScoreN/A45Redmi A3 offers better camera performance.
Battery
Capacity3075mAh5000mAhRedmi A3 provides significantly longer battery life.
ChargingNon-removable10W fast charging, Non-removableRedmi A3 charges faster, reducing downtime.
Software
OSAndroid 10, up to 11Android 14Redmi A3 has a more modern OS with the latest features and security updates.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11 b/g/n802.11 a/b/g/n/acRedmi A3 supports faster Wi-Fi standards.
Bluetooth4.05.3 LERedmi A3 has a more efficient and feature-rich Bluetooth connection.
GPSGPS, A-GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouRedmi A3 offers more accurate location tracking in various regions.
SIMMicro SIM + Nano SIMNano SIM + Nano SIMOppo A53 offers more versatility with older SIM card formats.
Storage
Internal16GB/64GB64GB/128GBRedmi A3 offers more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
ExpandableNoNoLimited storage if you plan to store a lot of media.
Security
FeaturesRear-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensor might be more convenient for some users.
SensorsProximity, AccelerometerAccelerometer, Ultrasonic proximity virtualFunctionality may vary on the proximity sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A53 Advantages:

  • Slightly lighter and smaller, potentially more comfortable for some users.
  • Supports older Micro SIM format.

Practical Implications:

  • The smaller size might be preferred by users with smaller hands or those who prioritize portability.
  • Micro SIM support might be useful for users transitioning from older phones.

Xiaomi Redmi A3 Advantages:

  • Significantly faster processor (Helio G36 vs. Snapdragon 460).
  • Larger battery capacity (5000mAh vs. 3075mAh).
  • More modern Android version (Android 14 vs. Android 10).
  • More RAM options (up to 6GB vs. 4GB).
  • More internal storage options (up to 128GB vs. 64GB).
  • Faster Wi-Fi and Bluetooth versions.
  • Better screen protection (Gorilla Glass 3).
  • Better camera performance (DxOMark score of 45).

Practical Implications:

  • Smoother and more responsive performance in apps and games.
  • Longer battery life for all-day use.
  • Access to the latest Android features and security updates.
  • Better multitasking capabilities and storage for apps and media.
  • Faster data transfer and wireless connectivity.
  • Increased durability and scratch resistance.
  • Better photo and video quality.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi A3 is slightly larger and heavier.
  • Oppo A53 has a 13MP main camera compared to Redmi A3's 8MP, which is less of an advantage than the Redmi A3's camera's features and DxOMark score would suggest.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A53 Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize a slightly smaller and lighter phone.
  • Users with very basic smartphone needs (calling, texting, simple browsing).
  • Users who still use a Micro SIM card.

Use Cases:

  • Basic communication device for seniors.
  • Secondary phone for emergencies.

Xiaomi Redmi A3 Ideal User:

  • Users who want the best possible performance and features for the price.
  • Users who prioritize battery life, storage, and a modern Android experience.
  • Users who enjoy mobile gaming and media consumption.

Use Cases:

  • Daily driver for students or budget-conscious individuals.
  • Phone for social media, streaming, and casual gaming.
  • Device for travel with long battery life and reliable GPS.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. How important is performance and responsiveness? (If important, Redmi A3 is the clear winner)
  2. What is your budget? (Determine if the Redmi A3's advantages justify any price difference)
  3. How much storage do you need? (Redmi A3 offers significantly more internal storage)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Performance is critical, and budget is flexible: Choose the Xiaomi Redmi A3.
  • Scenario 2: Budget is extremely tight, and basic functionality is sufficient: Oppo A53 is adequate, but consider if the Redmi A3 is accessible at a slightly higher price point.
  • Scenario 3: Long battery life is essential: Choose the Xiaomi Redmi A3.

My Choice

I would choose the Xiaomi Redmi A3. The performance difference, larger battery, and newer Android version make it a much better long-term investment. Even if the Oppo A53 is slightly smaller, the overall user experience on the Redmi A3 would be significantly superior for daily tasks, gaming, and media consumption. I consider the better screen protection and camera to be valuable additions as well, especially with the lack of expandable storage on both phones.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.