Oppo A53 vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A53
Oppo A53
Oppo

General

Launch Date August 25, 2020 April 28, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 103.39 cm³ 105.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 186 g 210 g
Height 163.9 mm 162.5 mm
Width 75.1 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fairy White
  • Electric Black
  • Fancy Blue
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 86.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 105.64 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.36 mAh/cm³ 44.36 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 11 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Poco F4 GTPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm162.5 × 76.7 × 8.5 mmMinor size differences; Poco F4 GT slightly wider, A53 slightly taller. Impact negligible for most users.
Weight186g210gOppo A53 is noticeably lighter, which may be preferable for extended one-handed use.
Build Quality (Screen)UnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusPoco F4 GT offers significantly better screen protection against scratches and drops.
Display
Size6.5"6.67"Slightly larger screen on Poco F4 GT provides a more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution720x16001080x2400Poco F4 GT has a much sharper display. Text and images will appear clearer.
Pixel Density270 PPI395 PPINoticeably sharper image quality on the Poco F4 GT, especially important for reading and viewing detailed content.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDPoco F4 GT's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and potentially better battery life with dark mode. More vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzSmoother scrolling and animations on Poco F4 GT, particularly noticeable in fast-paced games and UI interactions.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsIdentical peak brightness, but value is wrong, can't tell which one is better in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm)Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Vastly superior performance on the Poco F4 GT. It can handle demanding games, multitasking, and future software updates with ease.
AnTuTu Score34,9851,178,365Huge performance gap. Poco F4 GT will feel significantly faster and more responsive.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 730Poco F4 GT delivers vastly superior graphics performance, essential for gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM2 GB or 4 GB8 GB or 12 GBPoco F4 GT allows for much smoother multitasking and running multiple apps simultaneously without slowdowns.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.264MP, f/1.73Poco F4 GT captures significantly more detailed and higher-quality photos, especially in low light. Wider aperture allows more light.
Selfie Camera5MP20MP, f/2.4Much sharper and more detailed selfies on the Poco F4 GT.
Wide Angle LensNone8MP, f/2.2Poco F4 GT allows for wider field of view in photos, capturing more of the scene.
Macro LensNone2MP, f/2.4Poco F4 GT can take close-up shots of small objects.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@60fpsPoco F4 GT records much higher resolution and smoother video, suitable for vlogging and capturing high-quality memories.
Battery
Capacity3075mAh4700mAhPoco F4 GT likely offers much better battery life, especially with its more efficient processor.
ChargingNon-removable120W Fast ChargingPoco F4 GT can charge from 0-100% in a very short time, a huge convenience.
Software
OSAndroid 10 (upgradable to 11)Android 12 (upgradable to 13)Poco F4 GT has a more modern operating system with the latest features and security updates.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/nWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Poco F4 GT supports faster and more stable Wi-Fi connections.
Bluetooth4.05.2Poco F4 GT has a more modern Bluetooth version for better range, speed, and power efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPSA-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2)Poco F4 GT has more reliable and accurate GPS positioning.
Storage
Internal Storage16 GB or 64 GB128 GB or 256 GBPoco F4 GT offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, videos, and other files.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage.
Audio
Audio QualityBasicDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesPoco F4 GT delivers a much richer and more immersive audio experience, great for music, movies, and gaming.
Security
Security FeaturesRear-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth offer fingerprint security. Side-mounted can sometimes be more convenient.
Sensors
SensorsProximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, RGB, Ultrasonic proximity virtualPoco F4 GT has a more comprehensive set of sensors, enabling more advanced features and applications.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A53 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for prolonged use, especially one-handed.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Likely more affordable, making it an option for budget-conscious buyers.

Practical Implications:

  • The lighter weight could be important for users who frequently use their phone for extended periods or have smaller hands.

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful Processor: Enables smooth performance in demanding applications, games, and multitasking.
  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, and faster refresh rate provide a much better viewing experience.
  • Better Camera System: Captures higher-quality photos and videos with more features.
  • Larger Battery and Fast Charging: Longer battery life and faster charging times offer greater convenience.
  • More Modern Software: Latest Android version with the newest features and security updates.
  • Better Connectivity: Supports faster Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards.
  • Superior Audio Quality: Stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos support provide a more immersive audio experience.
  • More Sensors: Enable more advanced features like accurate compass and gyroscope for gaming and AR applications.

Practical Implications:

  • The vastly superior performance of the Poco F4 GT translates to a smoother and more enjoyable user experience in virtually all aspects. The camera, display, and audio enhancements significantly improve multimedia consumption and creation.

Trade-offs:

  • The Poco F4 GT is heavier and likely more expensive than the Oppo A53.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A53 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality and long battery life.
  • Users who primarily use their phone for calls, texting, and light web browsing.
  • Users who prefer a lighter phone for comfort.

Oppo A53 Use Cases:

  • As a secondary phone for calls and basic tasks.
  • For users who don't require high performance or advanced features.

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Ideal User:

  • Gamers who demand high performance and a smooth display.
  • Users who consume a lot of multimedia content (videos, movies, music).
  • Photography enthusiasts who want a versatile camera system.
  • Power users who multitask frequently and require a responsive device.
  • Users who value a premium experience with advanced features.

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Use Cases:

  • Playing demanding mobile games.
  • Watching videos and movies in high quality.
  • Taking photos and videos in various scenarios.
  • Running multiple apps simultaneously without slowdowns.
  • Using AR applications that require accurate sensors.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • While the Oppo A53 may be cheaper, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT offers a significantly better price-to-value ratio due to its vastly superior performance, features, and overall user experience. The Poco F4 GT gives more for the money if the budget allows.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Oppo A53 is likely more affordable, but the Poco F4 GT offers far more value for the money.
  2. What are your primary use cases? If you primarily use your phone for basic tasks, the Oppo A53 may suffice. However, if you plan to play games, watch videos, or take photos, the Poco F4 GT is a much better choice.
  3. How important is performance to you? The Poco F4 GT offers vastly superior performance, resulting in a smoother and more responsive user experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Limited Budget, Basic Needs: Choose the Oppo A53.
  • Scenario 2: Gaming and Multimedia Focus: Choose the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced Needs, Moderate Budget: Consider alternatives in the mid-range category as the A53 will be too slow.

What I would choose

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. While the Oppo A53 might be initially appealing due to its lower weight and potentially lower price, the sheer difference in performance and features makes the Poco F4 GT a much more sensible choice. As someone who uses my phone for a variety of tasks, including gaming, media consumption, and photography, the Poco F4 GT would provide a significantly better experience across the board. The superior display, powerful processor, and better camera system are all essential for my daily use. I am willing to spend the extra money for a phone that will provide a better user experience for a longer period.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.