Oppo A53 vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A53
Oppo A53
Oppo

General

Launch Date August 25, 2020 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2020 2023

Physical

Volume 103.39 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 186 g 192 g
Height 163.9 mm 168 mm
Width 75.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fairy White
  • Electric Black
  • Fancy Blue
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.36 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 13
Maximum OS Version 11

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Dimensions163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm168 x 78 x 8.1 mmPoco C65 is larger and may be less comfortable for one-handed use. A53 is slightly thicker, but the difference is negligible.
Weight186g192gPoco C65 is slightly heavier, but both are within a similar weight range.
BuildStandardStandardBoth phones are standard build smartphones.

Display

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Size6.5"6.74"Poco C65 offers a slightly more immersive viewing experience for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Both have the same HD+ resolution, which may appear slightly pixelated on the larger Poco C65 screen.
PPI270260Similar pixel density, so sharpness is comparable between the two screens.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer similar color reproduction and viewing angles typical of IPS LCDs.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smoother scrolling and animations compared to standard 60Hz displays.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness information missing, making it impossible to compare outdoor visibility.

Performance

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm)Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)Poco C65 offers significantly better performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
AnTuTu Score34,985237,768Poco C65 is substantially faster, making it more suitable for users who need responsive performance.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G52 MC2Poco C65 has a more powerful GPU, resulting in better graphics performance in games and apps.
RAM2 GB or 4 GB4 GB, 6 GB, or 8 GBPoco C65 provides more RAM options, allowing for smoother multitasking and preventing apps from closing in the background.

Camera

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Main Camera13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06" sensor, 1.12 µm pixel size50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor, 0.64 µm pixel sizePoco C65 captures more detailed photos, especially in good lighting, and performs better in low light due to the wider aperture.
Selfie Camera5MP8MP, f/2.2Poco C65 captures slightly sharper and more detailed selfies.
Depth CameraN/A2MP, f/2.4Poco C65 can take photos with a blurred background effect (bokeh) for portraits.
Macro LensN/A2MP, f/2.4Poco C65 can capture close-up shots of small objects.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record video at the same resolution and frame rate.
Slow-motionNo, 30 fpsYes, 120 fpsPoco C65 captures more detailed slow-motion videos.

Battery

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Capacity3075mAh5000mAhPoco C65 offers significantly longer battery life, potentially lasting a full day or more with moderate use.
ChargingLi-Ion18W fast charging, Li-PolymerPoco C65 charges much faster and uses safer Li-Polymer technology.
Reverse ChargingNoYesPoco C65 can be used to charge other devices, such as wireless earbuds, in a pinch.

Storage

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Internal Storage16 GB or 64 GB128 GB or 256 GBPoco C65 offers much more storage space for apps, photos, videos, and other files.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage.

Connectivity

FeatureOppo A53Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/acPoco C65 supports faster and more reliable Wi-Fi connections.
Bluetooth4.05.3 LEPoco C65 has a newer Bluetooth version with improved range, speed, and power efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoPoco C65 offers more accurate and reliable location tracking.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A53 Advantages:

  • Slightly Lighter: At 186g, it's a bit lighter than the Poco C65, which might be preferable for some users.
  • Micro SIM Support: Supports Micro SIM card.

Practical Implications: The weight difference is marginal. Micro SIM support is an older standard.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Helio G85 chipset offers a much better user experience than the Snapdragon 460, making the phone more responsive and capable of handling demanding tasks.
  • Superior Camera System: The 50MP main camera and inclusion of macro and depth lenses provides more versatile photography options.
  • Larger Battery and Faster Charging: The 5000mAh battery and 18W fast charging offer significantly longer battery life and quicker recharge times.
  • More Storage and RAM: Higher storage and RAM options allow for more apps, files, and smoother multitasking.
  • Modern Connectivity: Newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards provide faster and more reliable connections.
  • Reverse Charging: Can act as a power bank for other devices.

Practical Implications: The Poco C65 is a more capable and modern device overall.

Trade-offs:

  • The Poco C65 is slightly larger and heavier, which may not be ideal for users with smaller hands.
  • Neither phone offers expandable storage, which could be a limitation for some users.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A53 Ideal User:

  • Users with very basic smartphone needs.
  • Price-sensitive buyers who prioritize affordability above all else.

Use Cases:

  • Making and receiving calls
  • Sending basic text messages
  • Light web browsing
  • Using basic apps

Xiaomi Poco C65 Ideal User:

  • Students or young adults who need a versatile and affordable smartphone for school, entertainment, and social media.
  • Users who want a good camera for capturing photos and videos.
  • Users who need a long-lasting battery.
  • Users who enjoy mobile gaming.

Use Cases:

  • Social media
  • Mobile gaming
  • Photography and videography
  • Streaming video content
  • Running multiple apps simultaneously

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Oppo A53 may be the only option if the budget is extremely limited.
  2. How important is performance? If you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks and run smoothly, the Poco C65 is the clear choice.
  3. How important is battery life? The Poco C65's larger battery will provide significantly longer usage times.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight budget, very basic needs. Choose the Oppo A53.
  • Scenario 2: Need a versatile phone for everyday use, including gaming and photography. Choose the Xiaomi Poco C65.
  • Scenario 3: Long battery life is a top priority. Choose the Xiaomi Poco C65.

My Choice

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco C65.

Reasoning:

The Poco C65 offers a significantly better overall user experience due to its superior performance, camera system, battery life, and modern connectivity features. While the Oppo A53 might be slightly lighter, the benefits of the Poco C65 far outweigh this minor advantage. The Poco C65 is a much more capable and future-proof device that can handle a wider range of tasks and provide a smoother, more enjoyable user experience. The substantial improvements in processing power, camera quality, and battery life make it a worthwhile investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.