Oppo A53 vs Samsung Galaxy M53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A53
Oppo A53
Oppo

General

Launch Date August 25, 2020 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 103.39 cm³ 93.85 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.81 "/g
Weight 186 g 176 g
Height 163.9 mm 164.7 mm
Width 75.1 mm 77 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fairy White
  • Electric Black
  • Fancy Blue
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.36 mAh/cm³ 53.28 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 11 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo A53 and Samsung Galaxy M53, focusing on practical user experience implications:

FeatureOppo A53Samsung Galaxy M53Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm164.7 × 77 × 7.4 mmM53 is slightly larger and thinner; A53 may feel more compact in hand, while M53 is more pocketable due to thinner profile.
Weight186g176gM53 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.7"M53 offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution720x16001080x2408M53 has a significantly sharper and more detailed display; Text and images appear clearer.
PPI270394M53 has noticeably crisper visuals, reducing pixelation and improving readability.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDM53 provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, leading to a more immersive viewing experience. AMOLED is also more power-efficient with dark themes.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzM53 provides smoother scrolling and animations; The difference may be subtle but noticeable in fast-paced games and UI interactions.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness at 0 nits
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)M53 offers significantly faster performance for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking. Apps launch quicker, and the phone feels more responsive.
AnTuTu Score34,985500,100M53 is drastically faster, providing a much smoother overall experience.
GPUAdreno 610 (Qualcomm Adreno 405)Mali-G68 MC4 (Mali-G68 MC4 4x cores)M53 has better graphics processing capabilities, resulting in smoother gameplay and faster image processing.
RAM2 GB or 4 GB6 GB or 8 GBM53 handles multitasking far better, allowing more apps to run in the background without slowing down.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.2108MP, f/1.8M53 captures significantly more detailed photos, especially in good lighting; The wider aperture allows for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera5MP32MP, f/2.2M53 takes much higher-resolution and sharper selfies.
Wide Angle LensNo8MP, f/2.2M53 allows for capturing wider scenes, such as landscapes or group photos.
Portrait Mode (depth)No2MP, f/2.4M53 creates a depth-of-field effect for portrait shots, blurring the background.
Macro LensNo2MP, f/2.4M53 can capture close-up shots of small objects with fine details.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsM53 can record higher-resolution video, resulting in sharper and more detailed footage.
Battery
Capacity3075mAh5000mAhM53 offers significantly longer battery life, potentially lasting a full day or more on a single charge.
ChargingLi-Ion25W fast charging, Li-IonM53 charges much faster, reducing downtime; A 25W charger is not included.
Software
OSAndroid 10, up to 11Android 12, up to 13M53 has a more up-to-date operating system with the latest features and security updates.
Storage
Internal16 GB or 64 GB128 GB or 256 GBM53 has significantly more internal storage for apps, photos, videos, and other files.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage
Audio
Audio QualityBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersM53 provides a more immersive and higher-quality audio experience, especially for multimedia consumption.
Security
Featuresrear-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth phones offer biometric security; Side-mounted may be considered more convenient by some users.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/acM53 supports faster and more reliable Wi-Fi connections.
BluetoothBluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 5.2M53 offers faster and more efficient Bluetooth connectivity with a wider range of supported devices and features.
GPSGPS, A-GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoM53 offers more accurate and reliable location tracking, especially in areas with weak GPS signals.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A53 Advantages:

  • Potentially More Compact: Slightly smaller dimensions might appeal to users preferring smaller phones.
  • Micro SIM Support: Offers compatibility with older Micro SIM cards
  • Lower Price: Likely more affordable, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers.

Practical Implications:

  • A53 may be easier to handle for users with smaller hands or those who prefer pocket-friendly devices.
  • The lower price makes it an accessible option for basic smartphone use.

Samsung Galaxy M53 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution and refresh rate provides a significantly better viewing experience.
  • Much Faster Performance: The Dimensity 900 chipset offers significantly better performance for all tasks.
  • Significantly Better Camera System: The 108MP main camera and additional lenses provide much greater versatility and image quality.
  • Larger Battery: Offers significantly longer battery life.
  • Faster Charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More Modern Software: Comes with a newer version of Android and is likely to receive more updates.
  • More Storage and RAM: Provides more space for apps and files, and smoother multitasking.
  • Better Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards for faster and more reliable connections.
  • Enhanced Audio: Stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos support provide a better audio experience.
  • Gyroscope Sensor: Enables better motion tracking for AR apps and gaming

Practical Implications:

  • M53 is ideal for users who prioritize media consumption, gaming, photography, and overall performance.
  • The longer battery life and faster charging are beneficial for users who are frequently on the go.
  • The better software support ensures access to the latest features and security updates.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo A53's biggest trade-off is its significantly weaker performance and inferior display compared to the Samsung Galaxy M53. This impacts almost every aspect of the user experience, from app loading times to media consumption.
  • Samsung Galaxy M53 does not include a charging brick in the box.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A53 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who primarily need a phone for basic communication (calls, texts, simple social media).
  • Users who prioritize a smaller form factor.
  • Individuals with minimal performance demands (no gaming, light browsing).

Use Cases:

  • Basic communication and light web browsing.
  • As a secondary phone for calls and texts.
  • For users who don't require high-end features or performance.

Samsung Galaxy M53 Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize media consumption (videos, games, photos).
  • Users who need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
  • Photography enthusiasts who want a versatile camera system.
  • Users who want a smooth and responsive user experience.
  • Users who value having the latest software and features.

Use Cases:

  • High-quality photography and video recording.
  • Immersive gaming and multimedia consumption.
  • Smooth multitasking and running demanding apps.
  • Reliable performance for everyday use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Oppo A53 is likely to be significantly cheaper.
  2. How important are performance and display quality to you? If you prioritize smooth performance and immersive visuals, the Galaxy M53 is the clear choice.
  3. How important is battery life? Galaxy M53 will last much longer.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Use: If your budget is very limited and you only need a phone for basic tasks, the Oppo A53 might suffice. However, be prepared for noticeable performance limitations.
  • Scenario 2: Balanced Performance and Features: The Samsung Galaxy M53 offers a significantly better experience in almost every aspect. It's a better choice if you can afford it.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy M53 with its versatile camera system is the better choice for photography.

Decision

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M53. While the Oppo A53 might be tempting due to its lower price, the Galaxy M53 offers a vastly superior user experience. The improved display quality, significantly faster performance, better camera system, larger battery, and more modern software make it a much more worthwhile investment. The absence of a charger in the box of the Galaxy M53 is a downside, but the overall benefits far outweigh this inconvenience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.