Oppo A53 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A53
Oppo A53
Oppo

General

Launch Date August 25, 2020 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 103.39 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 186 g 222 g
Height 163.9 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75.1 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fairy White
  • Electric Black
  • Fancy Blue
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.36 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version 11

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo A53 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo A53Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm162.3 × 78.6 × 9.1 mmM35 is wider and thicker, potentially less comfortable in hand. A53 is taller.
Weight186g222gM35 is noticeably heavier, may cause fatigue during extended use.
Build Quality (Screen Protection)UnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusM35 offers significantly better scratch and drop resistance.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720x16001080x2340M35 offers a much sharper and clearer image, better for reading, videos, and gaming.
Pixel Density (PPI)270390M35 displays finer details and less pixelation.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDM35 has superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors. Also, AMOLED is more power-efficient when using dark themes.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzM35 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsUnable to compare due to missing data.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)M35 offers significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance due to a more powerful and efficient processor.
AnTuTu Score34,985578,500M35 is drastically faster in overall performance.
GPUAdreno 610 (Qualcomm Adreno 405)Mali-G68 MP5 (ARM Mali-G68 MP5)M35 handles graphically intensive tasks and games much better.
RAM2 GB or 4 GB6 GB or 8 GBM35 allows for more apps to run in the background without slowing down.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 1.00µmM35 captures much more detailed photos, especially in good lighting. Wider aperture allows for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera5MP13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µmM35 takes higher-resolution and sharper selfies.
Wide Angle LensNo8MP, f/2.2M35 offers a wider field of view for group photos and landscapes.
Macro LensNo2MP, f/2.4M35 can capture close-up details of small objects.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsM35 records significantly higher quality videos with better stabilization.
Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)NoYesM35 produces less blurry videos and sharper photos, especially in low light.
Battery
Capacity3075mAh6000mAhM35 offers significantly longer battery life, potentially lasting a full day or more.
ChargingLi-Ion25W fast charging, Li-IonM35 charges much faster, reducing downtime.
Software
OSAndroid 10 (upgradable to 11)Android 14M35 has a more modern operating system with the latest features and security updates.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/nWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)M35 has faster and more reliable Wi-Fi connectivity.
Bluetooth4.05.3M35 offers improved Bluetooth range, speed, and efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoM35 provides more accurate location tracking in various environments.
Storage
Internal16 GB or 64 GB128 GB or 256 GBM35 offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
ExpandableNoNoNo option to increase storage on either phone
Audio
Audio QualityBasicDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersM35 delivers a much richer and immersive audio experience.
Security
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedSide-mounted is easier to reach with your thumb while holding the phone
Other Sensors
SensorsProximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic, Ultrasonic proximity virtualM35 includes sensors for advanced motion tracking and more features like VR or AR.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A53 Advantages:

  • Lighter: More comfortable to hold for extended periods.
  • Potentially Cheaper: Being an older model, it might be available at a lower price (market dependent).

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Sharper, more vibrant, and better contrast.
  • Significantly Faster Performance: Handles apps, games, and multitasking much better.
  • Better Camera System: Captures higher quality photos and videos with more features.
  • Much Longer Battery Life: Lasts significantly longer on a single charge.
  • More Modern Software: Up-to-date operating system with the latest features and security.
  • Enhanced Connectivity: Faster Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.
  • More Storage: Plenty of space for apps, media, and files.
  • Better Audio: Stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos support.

Trade-offs:

  • Choosing the Oppo A53 means accepting significantly lower performance, a poorer display, and an outdated camera for a lighter device that may be cheaper.
  • Choosing the Samsung Galaxy M35 means paying more for a modern, capable device that is slightly heavier.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A53 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability over performance and features.
  • Users with very basic smartphone needs such as calls, messaging, and occasional light browsing.
  • Users who prefer a lighter phone and are sensitive to weight.

Use Cases:

  • A backup phone for emergencies.
  • A basic phone for elderly users who primarily need to make calls.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Ideal User:

  • Users who want a well-rounded smartphone experience with good performance, a great display, and a capable camera.
  • Users who enjoy mobile gaming, watching videos, and multitasking.
  • Users who need long battery life.

Use Cases:

  • Daily driver for work and personal use.
  • Mobile gaming and entertainment.
  • Photography and videography.
  • Frequent travelers who need long battery life.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A53 is likely cheaper, but the M35 offers far more value.
  2. What are your primary uses for the phone? If it's just basic communication, the A53 might suffice. For anything more demanding, the M35 is the clear choice.
  3. How important is battery life to you? The M35 has a much larger battery, which could be crucial for some users.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Needs: Choose the Oppo A53.
  • Scenario 2: Balanced Performance and Features: Choose the Samsung Galaxy M35.
  • Scenario 3: Demanding User, Long Battery Life Required: Choose the Samsung Galaxy M35.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. While the Oppo A53 might be cheaper, the M35 offers a vastly superior experience in almost every aspect. The better display, significantly faster performance, excellent camera, and exceptional battery life make it a much more practical and enjoyable device to use daily. The longer software support is also a key factor for security and future-proofing. The heavier weight is a small price to pay for the overall benefits.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.