Oppo A53 vs Samsung Galaxy M32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A53
Oppo A53
Oppo

General

Launch Date August 25, 2020 June 28, 2021
Release Year 2020 2021

Physical

Volume 103.39 cm³ 99.02 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.56 "/g
Weight 186 g 180 g
Height 163.9 mm 159.3 mm
Width 75.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fairy White
  • Electric Black
  • Fancy Blue
  • Black
  • Light Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.4 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.36 mAh/cm³ 50.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 11 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo A53Samsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm159.3 x 74 x 8.4 mmM32 is slightly more compact, potentially easier to handle for some users. Both have the same thickness.
Weight186g180gNegligible difference.
Display
Size6.5"6.4"Minimal difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720x16001080x2400M32 has a much sharper and clearer display. Text and images will appear significantly more detailed.
PPI270411Higher pixel density on M32 means crisper visuals, less pixelation.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDM32's AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, better contrast, and potentially better battery life with dark mode.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smoother scrolling and animations compared to standard 60Hz displays.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11 nm)Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)M32's Helio G80 is significantly faster. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app launches, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score34,985204,000M32 demonstrates much better performance.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G52 MC2M32's GPU provides better graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps.
RAM2GB/4GB4GB/6GB/8GBM32 offers more RAM options, leading to better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.264MP, f/1.8M32's main camera will capture significantly more detailed photos, especially in good lighting. Wider aperture allows for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera5MP20MP, f/2.2M32's selfie camera will produce much sharper and detailed selfies.
Wide Angle LensNo8MPM32 can capture wider scenes, useful for landscapes or group photos.
Macro LensNo2MPM32 can take close-up photos of small objects.
Depth SensorNo2MPM32 can create better bokeh (blurred background) effects in portrait photos.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video quality for basic use.
Slow MotionNoYes, 120fpsM32 can record slow-motion videos.
Battery
Capacity3075mAh5000mAhM32's significantly larger battery will provide much longer battery life, potentially lasting a full day or more for most users.
ChargingStandard25W Fast ChargingM32 supports faster charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Software
OSAndroid 10 (upgradable to 11)Android 11 (upgradable to 13)M32 offers a more modern Android experience and longer software support.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11 b/g/n802.11 a/b/g/n/acM32 supports faster and more stable Wi-Fi connections.
Bluetooth4.05.0M32 has a newer Bluetooth version for faster and more reliable connections with accessories.
GPSGPS, A-GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoM32 offers more accurate and reliable location tracking.
Storage
Internal16GB/64GB64GB/128GBM32 offers more internal storage for apps, photos, and videos.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.
Security
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedSide-mounted fingerprint sensor may be more convenient for some users.
Other
SensorsProximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeM32 has more sensors, enabling more features and better performance in games and apps.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A53 Advantages:

  • Slightly taller and wider screen, though the difference is minimal.
  • Potentially lower price (depending on current market prices).

    Practical Implication: If budget is the absolute primary concern, the A53 might be cheaper, but the trade-offs are significant.

Samsung Galaxy M32 Advantages:

  • Significantly better display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology.
  • Much faster processor and GPU: Better performance in all tasks.
  • Larger battery: Longer battery life.
  • Superior camera system: Higher resolution sensors, wide-angle lens, macro lens, depth sensor.
  • More RAM options: Smoother multitasking.
  • Newer Android version: Longer software support.
  • More connectivity options: Newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards.
  • More sensors: Compass, Gyroscope.

    Practical Implication: The M32 offers a vastly superior user experience in almost every aspect.

Trade-offs:

  • The only real trade-off is the potential price difference, but the M32 offers significantly more value for the money.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A53 Ideal User:

  • Users with extremely tight budgets who primarily need a phone for basic calling and texting.
  • Users who are not concerned with display quality, performance, or camera capabilities.
  • Users who only require minimal storage space for a few essential apps.

    Use Cases: Basic communication, very light social media browsing.

Samsung Galaxy M32 Ideal User:

  • Users who want a well-rounded smartphone experience without breaking the bank.
  • Users who value display quality, performance, camera capabilities, and battery life.
  • Users who enjoy gaming, streaming videos, and using social media.
  • Users who want a phone that will last for several years with software updates.

    Use Cases: Daily communication, social media, photography, video streaming, gaming, navigation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is my budget? The M32 will likely cost more, but the added value is immense. Is the difference affordable?
  2. What are my primary use cases? If you only need a phone for basic calls and texts, the A53 might suffice. However, for anything beyond that, the M32 is the clear choice.
  3. How long do I plan to use the phone? The M32's newer software and better performance will make it a more future-proof option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Extremely tight budget, minimal usage: Oppo A53 (but consider very carefully if you can stretch your budget).
  • Scenario 2: Budget-conscious, but want a decent smartphone experience: Samsung Galaxy M32.
  • Scenario 3: Value performance, camera, and battery life: Samsung Galaxy M32.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M32 without hesitation. While the Oppo A53 might be slightly cheaper (depending on current pricing), the M32 offers a vastly superior user experience in almost every aspect. The improved display quality, significantly better performance, superior camera system, and longer battery life make it a much more worthwhile investment. The M32 is the clear winner in terms of price-to-value ratio, providing a well-rounded and enjoyable smartphone experience for the vast majority of users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.