Oppo A53 vs Samsung Galaxy A03 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A53
Oppo A53
Oppo

General

Launch Date August 25, 2020 January 21, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 103.39 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 186 g 196 g
Height 163.9 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fairy White
  • Electric Black
  • Fancy Blue
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.36 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 11 13

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo A53 vs. Samsung Galaxy A03

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo A53Samsung Galaxy A03Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm, 186g164.2 × 75.9 × 9.1 mm, 196gGalaxy A03 is slightly thicker and heavier, potentially less comfortable for extended one-handed use.
Build MaterialUnknownUnknownImpact resistance, scratch resistance - hard to determine without specific material information.
Display
Size6.5"6.5"Identical screen real estate for content consumption.
Resolution720x1600 (270 PPI)720x1600 (270 PPI)Both will show similar levels of detail. Not ideal for pixel-peepers or VR.
TechnologyIPS LCDPLS LCDIPS LCD generally offers better viewing angles and color accuracy compared to PLS LCD, making media consumption more enjoyable on Oppo A53.
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzOppo A53's 90Hz display will feel smoother during scrolling and animations compared to the Galaxy A03's 60Hz display.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsWithout brightness info it is hard to tell what will work better in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)The Galaxy A03's Unisoc T606 chipset has a significantly higher Antutu score than the Snapdragon 460, meaning faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 610 (Qualcomm Adreno 405)Mali-G57 MP1 (ARM Mali-G57)Galaxy A03 can handle graphically intensive tasks better.
RAM2 GB or 4 GB3 GB or 4 GBGalaxy A03 has a minimum of 3GB which will allow for slightly better multitasking and prevent apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.248MP, f/1.8Galaxy A03's 48MP camera captures more detail, performs better in low light due to wider aperture.
Selfie Camera5MP5MP, f/2.2Both phones have comparable selfie cameras.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsIdentical video recording capabilities suitable for basic social media sharing.
Battery
Capacity3075mAh5000mAhGalaxy A03's significantly larger battery provides much longer battery life, reducing the need for frequent charging.
ChargingLi-Ion7.5W fast charging, Li-IonGalaxy A03 with 7.5W fast charging reduces charging times compared to standard charging.
Software
OSAndroid 10 (upgradable to 11)Android 11 (upgradable to 13)Galaxy A03 gets more software updates (android 13)
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/n802.11b/g/n/acGalaxy A03 supports newer Wi-Fi standards, offering faster and more stable connections.
Bluetooth4.05.0 LEGalaxy A03 has more efficient battery usage when connected to bluetooth devices
Storage
Internal16 GB or 64 GB32 GB or 64 GB or 128 GBGalaxy A03 offers more storage space, allowing users to store more photos, videos, and apps.
ExpandableNoNoNo expandable storage limits the total storage capacity on both devices.
Audio
FeaturesBasic audio featuresDolby AtmosGalaxy A03 has enhanced audio.
Security
FeaturesRear-mounted fingerprint sensorBasic security featuresOppo A53 is more secure with the added fingerprint sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A53 Advantages:

  • 90Hz Display: Smoother scrolling and animations improve user experience.
  • Fingerprint Sensor: Convenient and secure unlocking.
  • IPS LCD: Better viewing angles and color accuracy on the display.
  • Micro SIM Support: Supports Micro SIM in addition to Nano SIM.

Samsung Galaxy A03 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Unisoc T606 offers much better performance.
  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery provides much longer battery life.
  • Higher Resolution Camera: 48MP camera captures more detailed photos.
  • More Storage Options: Up to 128GB internal storage.
  • Newer Android Version: Ships with a newer version of Android and receives more software updates.
  • Dolby Atmos: Enhanced spatial audio.
  • Fast Charging: 7.5W charging for quicker battery top-ups.
  • GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS: More satelite systems for location accuracy.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo A53 users trade performance, camera quality, battery life, and storage for a smoother display and fingerprint sensor.
  • Samsung Galaxy A03 users trade the convenience of a fingerprint sensor and display quality for better performance and camera quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A53 Ideal Users:

  • Users who prioritize a smoother scrolling experience and quick unlocking via fingerprint sensor.
  • Individuals who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and social media browsing.
  • Users on a very tight budget who are willing to compromise on performance.

Use Cases:

  • Casual social media browsing, where the 90Hz display enhances the scrolling experience.
  • Quickly unlocking the phone for checking notifications using the fingerprint sensor.

Samsung Galaxy A03 Ideal Users:

  • Users who need a long-lasting battery and better camera performance.
  • Individuals who play mobile games or use performance-intensive apps.
  • Users who value having the latest software updates.

Use Cases:

  • Taking high-quality photos and videos for social media.
  • Playing mobile games without experiencing lag or stuttering.
  • Using navigation apps for extended periods without worrying about battery life.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is my budget? (Consider the price difference between the two phones and whether the added features of the more expensive phone are worth the extra cost.)
  2. How important is battery life to me? (If you need a phone that can last all day, the Galaxy A03 is the better choice.)
  3. How important is performance to me? (If you plan to play games or use demanding apps, the Galaxy A03 is the better choice.)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Basic User, Tight Budget: Oppo A53 - The smoother display and fingerprint sensor provide a slightly better user experience for basic tasks at a lower price point.
  • Scenario 2: Performance and Camera Focused: Samsung Galaxy A03 - The superior performance, camera, and battery life make it a better choice for users who need a more capable device.
  • Scenario 3: Balance of Features and Budget: Samsung Galaxy A03 - Considering the overall package, the Galaxy A03 offers a better balance of features and value, even if it's slightly more expensive.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A03. While the 90Hz display and fingerprint sensor of the Oppo A53 are nice additions, the significantly improved performance, much larger battery, higher-resolution camera, and more modern software of the Galaxy A03 outweigh those advantages. The Galaxy A03 will offer a smoother, more responsive experience overall, capture better photos and videos, and last much longer on a single charge. The better performance and newer software also make it a more future-proof option.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.