Oppo A53 vs Oppo A16 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A53
Oppo A53
Oppo
Oppo A16
Oppo A16
Oppo

General

Launch Date August 25, 2020 July 17, 2021
Release Year 2020 2021

Physical

Volume 103.39 cm³ 104.02 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.43 "/g
Weight 186 g 190 g
Height 163.9 mm 163.8 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fairy White
  • Electric Black
  • Fancy Blue
  • Space Silver
  • Pearl Blue
  • Crystal Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.52 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 480 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.36 mAh/cm³ 48.07 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 610 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 11 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo A53Oppo A16Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm163.8 × 75.6 × 8.4 mmNegligible difference. Both phones will feel similar in hand.
Weight186g190gVirtually the same; unnoticeable difference in weight.
Display
Size6.5"6.52"Almost identical screen size, visually imperceptible.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Same sharpness; both displays are adequate for basic tasks but not ideal for high-resolution content.
PPI270269Practically the same pixel density, similar visual clarity.
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzOppo A53 offers smoother scrolling and animations, making the UI feel more responsive.
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 3Oppo A16 is more likely to withstand accidental scratches and minor drops.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11 nm)Mediatek Helio G35 (12 nm)Oppo A16's Helio G35 offers significantly better performance for apps, multitasking, and gaming.
AnTuTu Score34,985110,490The Oppo A16 will feel much faster and more responsive in daily use.
GPUAdreno 610 (Adreno 405)PowerVR GE8320Oppo A16 has better graphics performance, allowing for smoother gaming.
RAM2GB/4GB3GB/4GBOppo A16 with 3GB/4GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking, especially with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.2Similar main camera performance; image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting.
Selfie Camera5MP8MP, f/2.0Oppo A16 captures more detailed selfies, especially in low light due to the wider aperture.
Macro LensNo2MP, f/2.4Oppo A16 allows for close-up photography of small objects.
Black & White LensNo2MP, f/2.4Oppo A16 enables dedicated black and white photography.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities for both phones.
Slow-motion VideoNoYes, 90 fpsOppo A16 can record slow-motion videos.
Battery
Capacity3075mAh5000mAhOppo A16 offers significantly longer battery life, potentially lasting a full day or more with moderate use.
Reverse ChargingNoYesOppo A16 can be used as a power bank to charge other devices.
Software
OSAndroid 10 (upgradeable to 11)Android 11 (upgradeable to 12)Oppo A16 has a more up-to-date Android version, offering the latest features and security patches.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/acOppo A16 supports 5GHz Wi-Fi (802.11ac), which offers faster and more stable connections.
Bluetooth4.05.0 LEOppo A16 offers faster and more energy-efficient Bluetooth connectivity.
GPSGPS, A-GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoOppo A16 provides more accurate location tracking due to support for multiple satellite systems.
SIMMicro SIM + Nano SIMNano SIM + Nano SIMOppo A53 supports older Micro SIM.
Storage
Internal16GB/64GB32GB/64GBOppo A16 has minimum 32GB Storage compare to Oppo A53 minimum 16GB Storage
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.
Security
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedOppo A16's side-mounted sensor is generally more convenient and faster to access.
Sensors
SensorsProximity, AccelerometerProximity, Accelerometer, MagnetometerOppo A16 has a magnetometer (compass), which is useful for navigation and mapping applications.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A53 Advantages:

  • 90Hz Display: Provides smoother scrolling and animations for a more responsive user experience.

Oppo A16 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Helio G35 chipset offers a much faster and smoother experience than the Snapdragon 460.
  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery provides significantly longer battery life, crucial for heavy users.
  • More Cameras: Offers a macro and black & white lens, enhancing photography versatility.
  • Up-to-date Software: Comes with Android 11, ensuring access to the latest features and security updates.
  • Reverse Charging: Can act as a power bank for other devices.
  • Better Connectivity: Supports dual-band Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.0 for faster and more reliable connections.
  • More Accurate GPS: Supports more satellite systems for improved location accuracy.
  • Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3.
  • More sensors: Magnetometer

Trade-offs:

  • Choosing the Oppo A53 means prioritizing display smoothness (90Hz) over significantly better performance and battery life.
  • Choosing the Oppo A16 means sacrificing the 90Hz display for enhanced performance, battery, camera capabilities, and software.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A53 Ideal Users:

  • Users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media browsing.
  • Individuals who prioritize a smoother display experience above all else, even if it comes at the expense of overall performance.

Oppo A53 Use Cases:

  • Reading articles or browsing social media where the 90Hz refresh rate can be appreciated.

Oppo A16 Ideal Users:

  • Users who need a reliable phone for daily tasks, including moderate app usage, photography, and occasional gaming.
  • Individuals who prioritize battery life and want a phone that can easily last through a full day of use.

Oppo A16 Use Cases:

  • Taking photos of close-up subjects with the macro lens.
  • Using GPS navigation for extended periods without worrying about battery drain.
  • Playing mobile games that require more processing power.
  • Sharing battery with friends or family by reverse charging their devices.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display smoothness (90Hz) to you? If it's a top priority and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks, the Oppo A53 might be suitable.
  2. How important is battery life? If you need a phone that can last a full day or more with moderate use, the Oppo A16 is the clear choice.
  3. How important is camera versatility? If you want the ability to take macro and black & white photos, the Oppo A16 is the only option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Basic User with Limited Budget: If the budget is extremely tight and the user only needs a phone for basic tasks, the Oppo A53 might suffice if the price difference is significant. However, the Oppo A16 offers a much better overall experience for a marginal increase in price.
  • Scenario 2: Student/Young Adult: The Oppo A16 is a better fit due to its superior performance, battery life, and camera features, which are essential for social media, communication, and entertainment.
  • Scenario 3: User Prioritizing Battery Life: The Oppo A16 is the obvious choice due to its significantly larger battery capacity.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo A16. While the 90Hz display on the A53 is a nice-to-have feature, the A16 offers a far more compelling package overall. The vastly improved performance, significantly longer battery life, more versatile camera system, and updated software make it a much better investment. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor is also more convenient. The marginal difference in display smoothness is a worthwhile trade-off for the substantial improvements in other crucial areas, leading to a smoother and more enjoyable overall user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.