Nokia G100 vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G100
Nokia G100
Nokia

General

Launch Date October 1, 2022 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 113.73 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.34 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 195.1 g 188 g
Height 166.6 mm 166.3 mm
Width 76.7 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Nordic Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.72 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.3 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Nokia G100 and the Motorola Moto G35, dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureNokia G100Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9166.3 x 76 x 7.8Moto G35 is slightly thinner and lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Weight (g)195.1188Noticeable difference in hand; Moto G35 feels less bulky.
Display
Size (inches)6.526.72Moto G35 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2400Significantly sharper visuals and text on the Moto G35; noticeable difference in clarity.
Refresh Rate (Hz)-120Smoother scrolling and animations on the Moto G35, enhancing the overall user experience.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, HDR10Moto G35 supports HDR10 for richer colors and higher contrast in compatible content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 662Unisoc T760Moto G35 likely offers better performance with a more modern and powerful processor.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz & 3x2.0 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Moto G35's CPU configuration suggests superior multi-tasking and demanding application handling.
RAM (GB)3/44/8More RAM in certain Moto G35 variants enables smoother multitasking and app switching.
OSAndroid 12Android 14Moto G35 comes with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP + 5MP + 2MP50MP + 8MPMoto G35 boasts a significantly higher resolution main sensor, promising better image quality.
Selfie Camera8MP16MPHigher resolution selfie camera on the Moto G35 for sharper self-portraits.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity; actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.

2. Key Insights

The Nokia G100 presents itself as a budget-friendly option focusing on essential functionality. Its strengths lie in its large battery and durable build. However, it falls short in display resolution, performance, and camera quality compared to the Moto G35.

The Motorola Moto G35 positions itself as a more well-rounded mid-range device. Its higher resolution display with a 120Hz refresh rate, more powerful processor, larger RAM options, superior camera system, and newer Android OS make it a compelling choice. The inclusion of NFC also adds convenience for contactless payments.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Nokia G100: Best suited for users prioritizing battery life and basic communication needs, such as calling, texting, and light web browsing. Ideal for users on a tight budget who don't demand high performance or advanced features.

Motorola Moto G35: A better fit for users who value a smoother, more responsive user experience, enjoy media consumption on a larger, high-quality display, and require a capable camera for everyday photography. Suitable for those who engage in moderate multitasking and gaming.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia G100 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. multimedia consumption, gaming, etc.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Battery life, display quality, performance, camera, NFC.

Scenario-based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Needs: Nokia G100
  • Balanced Performance and Features: Motorola Moto G35

My Choice: Motorola Moto G35

While the Nokia G100 offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Motorola Moto G35. The significantly improved display, performance, camera, and the inclusion of NFC greatly enhance the overall user experience. The price difference is justifiable for the substantial upgrade in features and capabilities. The Moto G35 provides a more future-proof device that can handle a wider range of tasks and provide a more enjoyable user experience in the long run. A sharper, smoother display and a more capable camera are essential for me, making the Moto G35 the clear winner.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.