Nokia C22 vs vivo V40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C22
Nokia C22
Nokia
vivo V40
vivo V40
Vivo

General

Launch Date February 25, 2023 July 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.44 cm³ 93.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 190 g 190 g
Height 164.6 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Sand
  • Moonlight White
  • Stellar Silver (Titanium Grey)
  • Nebula Purple (Lotus Purple)
  • Ganges Blue
  • Sunglow Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 4500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 119.65 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.54 mAh/cm³ 58.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5500 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU IMG8322 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureNokia C22vivo V40Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6164.2 x 75 x 7.6Vivo V40 is slightly thinner. Negligible difference in overall size.
Weight (g)190190Same weight.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials unknown for both, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDVivo V40 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles with its AMOLED display.
Display Size (inches)6.56.78Vivo V40 has a larger display, providing more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 16001260 x 2800Vivo V40 has a much sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified120Vivo V40's 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother animations and scrolling.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A (28nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm)Vivo V40 boasts significantly faster processing power and better efficiency due to the advanced chipset and smaller process node.
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Vivo V40 provides substantially improved CPU performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
RAM (GB)2/312Vivo V40 offers vastly more RAM, enabling seamless multitasking and smooth app switching.
Storage (GB)64256/512Vivo V40 offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP Main, 2MP Macro50MP Main, 50MP Wide AngleVivo V40's camera system is superior with higher resolution sensors and a wide-angle lens.
Front Camera8MP50MPVivo V40 has a much higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with OIS, EISVivo V40 supports higher resolution video recording with optical image stabilization for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005500Vivo V40 has a slightly larger battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W80WVivo V40 offers significantly faster charging speeds.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Nokia C22 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

vivo V40 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Much faster processor, more RAM, smoother user experience.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, faster refresh rate for a significantly enhanced visual experience.
  • Advanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, wide-angle lens, 4K video recording with stabilization.
  • Faster Charging: 80W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More Storage: Ample storage space for apps and media.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Nokia C22:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light usage.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, web browsing, social media (limited usage).

vivo V40:

  • Ideal User: Users who demand high performance, a premium display, advanced camera capabilities, and fast charging.
  • Use Cases: Demanding gaming, multimedia consumption, photography, multitasking, mobile content creation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Nokia C22 is a budget phone, while the vivo V40 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone needs? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks and multimedia consumption.
  3. How important are camera quality and display quality to you? The vivo V40 significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 in these areas.

My Choice: vivo V40

While the Nokia C22 offers an incredibly affordable entry point into the smartphone market, the vivo V40 is the clear winner for me. The superior performance, vastly improved display, advanced camera system, fast charging, and ample storage make it a much more compelling device. The price difference is significant, but the vivo V40 offers a substantial upgrade in almost every aspect of the user experience. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chip, combined with 12GB of RAM, ensures smooth performance even for demanding tasks. The 120Hz AMOLED display is a visual treat, and the 80W fast charging is incredibly convenient. Even though the build quality is unknown for both, the known advancements in the vivo V40 make it a significantly better value for the features provided.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.