Motorola Razr 40 vs Xiaomi 14 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola
Xiaomi 14
Xiaomi 14
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 November 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 89.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 188 g
Height 170.8 mm 152.8 mm
Width 74 mm 71.5 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Jade Green

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.36 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1200 x 2670
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 89.3 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 113.97 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 51.46 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 4610 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Xiaomi 14Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 offers portability and a unique form factor, Xiaomi 14 is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4152.8 x 71.5 x 8.2Razr 40 is significantly shorter and narrower when folded, but thicker. Xiaomi 14 is thinner overall.
Weight (g)188.6188Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.96.36Razr 40 provides a larger screen for media consumption, Xiaomi 14 is more one-hand friendly.
Resolution1080 x 26401200 x 2670Similar pixel density, but Xiaomi 14 has slightly sharper visuals due to higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother scrolling and animations, noticeable in gaming and fast-paced content.
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO OLEDRazr 40's foldable display allows for a compact form factor when closed. Xiaomi 14's LTPO panel enables dynamic refresh rate adjustment for power saving.
Peak Brightness (nits)14003000Xiaomi 14's display is significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Xiaomi 14 boasts a significantly more powerful processor, resulting in faster performance, better multitasking, and improved gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Xiaomi 14's CPU has a more powerful core configuration, leading to a noticeable performance advantage.
RAM (GB)812Xiaomi 14 has more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Xiaomi 14 utilizes a larger sensor (1/1.31") with advanced features like pixel binning for potentially better low-light performance. Specific image quality comparisons require real-world testing.
Ultrawide (MP)1350Xiaomi 14 has a much higher resolution ultrawide, capturing more detail.
Telephoto (MP)N/A50Xiaomi 14 offers optical zoom capabilities, missing on the Razr 40.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42004610Xiaomi 14 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. Real-world usage will vary.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: The foldable design makes it incredibly compact when closed.
  • Unique Form Factor: The flip phone nostalgia and novelty appeal.
  • High Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations.

Xiaomi 14 Advantages:

  • Flagship Performance: Significantly faster and more powerful for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, optical zoom, and potentially better low-light performance.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Brighter Display: Much better outdoor visibility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Users who prioritize portability and a unique design over raw performance. Ideal for users who value compact size and style. Strong use cases include casual social media, light gaming, and situations where pocketability is paramount.

Xiaomi 14: Users who prioritize performance, camera quality, and a long-lasting battery. Ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts. Excels in demanding tasks, high-end gaming, capturing high-quality photos and videos, and extended usage without recharging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is portability your top priority? If yes, the Razr 40's foldable design is a strong contender.
  2. Do you need flagship-level performance for demanding tasks and gaming? If yes, the Xiaomi 14 is the clear winner.
  3. Is camera quality a crucial factor? The Xiaomi 14 offers a more versatile and potentially superior camera system.

My Choice: Xiaomi 14

While the Razr 40's foldable design is appealing, the Xiaomi 14 offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. The significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, superior camera system with optical zoom, brighter display, and larger battery outweigh the Razr 40's portability advantage for me. I prioritize performance and a great camera experience, making the Xiaomi 14 the better choice. The price difference, considering the performance gap, is justifiable for the value the Xiaomi 14 provides.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.