Motorola Razr 40 vs Honor X7b - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola
Honor X7b
Honor X7b
Honor

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 December 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 104.57 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 199 g
Height 170.8 mm 166.7 mm
Width 74 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Midnight Black
  • Emerald Green
  • Flowing Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 87.3 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 389 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 850 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 115.27 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 50.97 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5330 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Honor X7bPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 offers portability and a smaller footprint when folded. Honor X7b is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4166.7 x 76.5 x 8.2Razr 40 is significantly thinner and slightly shorter when unfolded, but wider when folded. Honor X7b is larger overall.
Weight (g)188.6199Razr 40 is noticeably lighter.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDIPS LCDRazr 40 provides deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency. Honor X7b's LCD is less power-hungry at peak brightness but has poorer contrast.
Size (inches)6.96.8Negligible size difference in terms of usability.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2412Similar sharpness; Razr 40 is slightly sharper due to a taller aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate (Hz)14490Razr 40 offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 680Razr 40 offers significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)Razr 40's CPU architecture is more powerful and efficient.
GPUAdreno 644Adreno 610Razr 40 offers considerably better graphics performance for gaming.
RAM (GB)86/8Razr 40's configuration offers better multitasking capabilities.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)64108Honor X7b has a higher resolution sensor, but image quality depends on factors beyond resolution (sensor size, processing).
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsRazr 40 offers higher resolution video recording with electronic image stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42005330Honor X7b has significantly larger battery capacity, likely resulting in longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Form Factor: Foldable design for portability and unique aesthetics.
  • Superior Display: AMOLED with higher refresh rate for a smoother, more vibrant visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful chipset and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.

Honor X7b Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Significantly larger battery for extended usage.
  • Lower Price: Potentially more affordable depending on specific configurations.
  • Standard Form Factor: Familiar and potentially more durable than a foldable phone.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40: Sacrifices battery life for a slimmer, foldable design and higher performance. Higher price point.
  • Honor X7b: Compromises on performance and display quality for longer battery life and a lower price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who prioritize portability, style, a premium display, and smooth performance, and are willing to pay a premium. Best for users who value a compact device for easier one-handed use and pocket storage.

Honor X7b: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize long battery life and basic functionality over top-tier performance and display quality. Best for users who heavily consume media and require extended battery life.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability and a unique design?
  2. What is your budget and how much do you prioritize performance?
  3. How important is battery life compared to other features like display quality and form factor?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For a frequent traveler: Razr 40's compact size when folded is ideal.
  • For a gamer: Razr 40's superior performance is essential.
  • For a heavy media consumer on a budget: Honor X7b's long battery life is a strong advantage.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 40

While the Honor X7b offers a compelling battery life and lower price, the Motorola Razr 40 aligns better with my personal priorities. I value the innovative foldable design, the superior AMOLED display with a high refresh rate, and the significantly better performance offered by the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. I'm willing to compromise on battery life for these advantages, especially given the portability benefits of a foldable phone. The smoother user experience, premium feel, and compact form factor outweigh the battery life difference for my usage pattern. I also find the potentially higher durability of a standard phone less compelling compared to the convenience and portability of the foldable design.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.