Motorola Moto G53 vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 15, 2022 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 183 g 188 g
Height 162.7 mm 166.3 mm
Width 74.7 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Arctic Silver
  • Pale Pink
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.72 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G53 and the Motorola Moto G35, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G53Motorola Moto G35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2166.3 x 76 x 7.8G53 is slightly more compact.
Weight (g)183188Negligible difference in weight; both feel comfortable in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.72G35 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400G35 boasts a significantly sharper display with Full HD+ resolution, resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar display technology, expect good color reproduction but potentially limited viewing angles.HDRNoYesG35 supports HDR content for enhanced dynamic range and more vibrant visuals.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GUnisoc T760G53 offers 5G connectivity, while the Unisoc T760 in the G35 might offer better CPU performance in some tasks. Head-to-head benchmarks would be needed to definitively compare performance.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreBoth are octa-core processors, but architectural differences could impact performance. Detailed benchmarks are needed for a precise comparison.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G57G57 generally offers superior graphics performance compared to Adreno 619, beneficial for gaming and visually demanding tasks.
RAM4/6/8GB8GBG35's 8GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications. G53 RAM options might impact performance depending on the chosen variant.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPBoth have the same main camera resolution, but sensor and image processing quality could differ. Real-world image comparisons are crucial.
Secondary Camera2MP (Macro)8MP (Wide Angle)G35 offers a more versatile secondary camera with a wider field of view.
Selfie Camera8MP16MPG35 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera for potentially better self-portraits.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsG35 supports 4K video recording for higher resolution videos.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity, expected similar battery life, but real-world usage will vary depending on optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The G35 likely edges out the G53 in raw processing and graphics power, thanks to the Unisoc T760 and Mali-G57 GPU. However, the Snapdragon 480+ in the G53 offers the crucial advantage of 5G connectivity.
  • Display: The G35's Full HD+ display provides a noticeably sharper and more detailed viewing experience compared to the G53's 720p display. The addition of HDR support on the G35 further enhances its visual appeal.
  • Camera: Both phones feature a 50MP main camera, but the G35 offers a more practical secondary wide-angle lens, enhancing versatility. The G35 also boasts a higher-resolution selfie camera.
  • Value Proposition: The G35 emerges as a strong contender with its superior display, performance, and camera capabilities. The G53's main advantage lies in its 5G connectivity, which might be a deciding factor for users prioritizing future-proofing.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G53: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize 5G connectivity and reliable performance for everyday tasks. Ideal for web browsing, social media, and casual photography.
  • Moto G35: A compelling choice for users seeking a well-rounded multimedia experience. Its superior display, performance, and camera system make it suitable for gaming, content consumption, and mobile photography enthusiasts.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is 5G connectivity a must-have? If yes, the G53 is your only option.
  2. Do you prioritize display quality and camera versatility? If so, the G35 offers a significant upgrade.
  3. What's your budget? Compare prices for similar configurations (RAM and storage) before making a final decision. G53 might offer more affordable options depending on RAM variant.

My Choice

I would choose the Motorola Moto G35. While I acknowledge the appeal of 5G in the G53, the G35's superior display, stronger performance (based on assumed benchmarks comparing the processors and GPU), more versatile camera system, and the inclusion of features like HDR significantly enhance the overall user experience. For my daily needs, which include content creation, light gaming, and multitasking, the G35 appears to offer a more compelling package. The sharper display and improved camera system are significant upgrades that would impact my daily usage more directly than 5G, especially considering the current state of 5G infrastructure and associated costs. The slight increase in size is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the improved screen real estate.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.