Motorola Moto G52 vs Nothing CMF Phone 1 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 20, 2022 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.42 cm³ 103.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.91 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 169 g 197 g
Height 160.1 mm 164 mm
Width 74.5 mm 77 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White
  • Black
  • Orange
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.4 mAh/cm³ 48.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G52 vs. Nothing CMF Phone 1: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven analysis, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMotorola Moto G52Nothing CMF Phone 1User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard Android 12 SkinCustom Android 14 SkinPotentially smoother animations and newer features on CMF Phone 1. G52 offers a familiar Android experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz Refresh Rate120Hz Refresh RateNoticeably smoother scrolling and animations on CMF Phone 1, leading to a more fluid and responsive feel.
AccessibilityStandard Android Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility Features + newer OSCMF Phone 1 potentially benefits from newer accessibility features introduced in Android 14.
ErgonomicsLighter (169g), Slimmer (8mm)Heavier (197g), Thicker (8.2mm)G52 offers a more comfortable one-handed experience due to its lighter weight and smaller dimensions.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're at a vibrant outdoor concert, trying to capture a video of your favorite band. The Moto G52's 1080p video recording might struggle in low light, while the Nothing Phone 1's 4K recording with EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization) will capture sharper, smoother footage, even in challenging conditions. Plus, its brighter display makes it easier to see what you're recording. However, if you are quickly trying to capture a wide shot of the crowd, the Moto G52's wide-angle lens gives you an advantage.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: A Senior Citizen: The G52's lighter weight and familiar Android interface might be easier to handle.

User 2: A Young Creative Professional: The CMF Phone 1's superior performance, camera capabilities, and brighter display might be more appealing.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Moto G52 prioritizes comfort and ease of use with its lighter weight and familiar Android experience. It is a reliable choice for users who value simplicity and affordability.

The Nothing CMF Phone 1 emphasizes performance and cutting-edge features with its faster processor, smoother display, and enhanced camera. It caters to users who demand speed, visual clarity, and the latest technology.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Nothing CMF Phone 1. While the Moto G52 offers a comfortable form factor, the CMF Phone 1's significantly better performance, stunning display, and enhanced camera capabilities are more aligned with my appreciation for innovative technology. The smoother 120Hz display provides a noticeably more enjoyable user experience, and the powerful processor ensures a fluid and responsive interface for demanding tasks. Although heavier, the advancements in performance and visuals outweigh the slight difference in weight. The commitment to a newer Android version also indicates a longer lifespan of software updates, making it a more future-proof choice. It's a device that not only delivers on functionality but also speaks to a modern design sensibility.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.