Motorola Moto G35 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 25, 2024 October 3, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 98.58 cm³ 100.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.57 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 188 g 213 g
Height 166.3 mm 162 mm
Width 76 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.72 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.3 % 88 %
Pixel Density 392 PPI 385 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1900 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.72 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.72 mAh/cm³ 46.92 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc T760 (6 nm) Exynos 2400e (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55) 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)
GPU Mali-G57 Xclipse 940

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G35Samsung Galaxy S24 FEPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.3 x 76 x 7.8 mm162 x 77.3 x 8 mmThe S24 FE is slightly shorter, wider, and thicker but overall very similar in size.
Weight188g213gThe Moto G35 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedUnder-displayPreference dependent; rear-mounted offers quicker access for some.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDDynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency.
Size6.72"6.7"Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical pixel density; sharpness will be similar.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness1000 nits1900 nitsThe S24 FE will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T760 (6nm)Exynos 2400e (4nm)Exynos 2400e on a smaller node likely translates to better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.2 GHz A76 + 3x A76 + 4x A55)10-core (1x3.1 GHz + ...)The S24 FE boasts higher clock speeds, indicating superior performance in demanding tasks. Specific core configurations suggest the S24 FE is better equipped for high-performance tasks.
GPUMali-G57Xclipse 940Xclipse 940 is expected to provide significantly better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM8GB8GBEqual RAM; multitasking capabilities should be similar.
Storage128GB256GB/512GBThe S24 FE offers more storage options for users with large media libraries.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps8K@30fps, 4K@120fps,...S24 FE offers significantly more advanced video recording capabilities including higher resolution and frame rates.
Other Camera SpecsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare image quality, low-light performance, and other camera features.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4700 mAhWhile the Moto G35 has a slightly larger battery, real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and display power consumption.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably more comfortable for extended use.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity, but real-world usage will vary.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology offers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility.
  • Significantly Faster Performance: More powerful chipset and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • More Storage Options: Caters to users with large media libraries.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Offers a wide range of resolutions and frame rates up to 8K.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The S24 FE likely commands a higher price within the "medium price" range due to its superior features.
  • Battery Life: While the G35 has a larger battery, the S24 FE's more efficient display might result in comparable battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G35: Budget-conscious users prioritizing a lightweight phone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography.

S24 FE: Users seeking a well-rounded phone with excellent performance, a vibrant display, and advanced camera features for gaming, content creation, and multimedia consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? While both are in the "medium price" range, the S24 FE is likely more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming, content creation, and multimedia consumption favor the S24 FE. Basic tasks and extended use without frequent charging might favor the G35.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display quality, performance, or battery life based on your needs.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Use: Moto G35
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (base storage option)
  • Demanding User, Content Creator: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (higher storage option)
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.