Motorola Moto G34 vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 29, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 97.1 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.63 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 179 g 180 g
Height 162.7 mm 163.9 mm
Width 74.6 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ice Blue
  • Ocean Green
  • Charcoal Black
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.49 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G34 vs. Samsung Galaxy M55: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond a simple spec comparison. I aim to provide a holistic view, incorporating market trends, technological ecosystems, and future implications.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureMotorola Moto G34Samsung Galaxy M55Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch Date2023-12-292024-03-28Indicates market timing and potential access to newer manufacturing processes/technologies.LowLowN/AN/A
Price RangeMediumMediumSuggests target audience and competitive landscape.LowLowN/APrice Sensitivity
Display6.5" IPS LCD, 120Hz, 720x1600 (270 ppi)6.7" Super AMOLED+, 120Hz, 1080x2400 (393 ppi)AMOLED offers superior contrast and color accuracy; higher resolution enhances visual clarity.MediumMediumDisplay QualityVisual Experience
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Node size indicates power efficiency and performance potential; 7 Gen 1 offers better performance.MediumHighProcessing PowerApp Responsiveness
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz, 3x2.36 GHz, 4x1.8 GHz)Core configuration and clock speeds impact processing power.MediumHighProcessing SpeedMultitasking Capability
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 644GPU performance crucial for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.MediumHighGraphics RenderingGaming Performance
RAM/Storage128GB/4GB, 128GB/8GB256GB/8GBRAM impacts multitasking; Storage affects app and media capacity.LowLowMemory ManagementStorage Capacity
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity indicates potential usage time.LowLowBattery LifeUsage Time
OSAndroid 13Android 14Newer OS version offers potential feature updates and security patches.LowHighSoftware UpdatesFeature Set
Camera (Video)1080p@30fps4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@60fps (OIS, EIS)Higher resolution and frame rate with stabilization provide superior video recording.HighHighVideo RecordingContent Creation

2. Strategic Technological Insights

The Samsung Galaxy M55, despite launching later, aligns with the trend of prioritizing performance and display quality in the mid-range segment. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, superior GPU, and AMOLED display demonstrate this. Motorola, with the G34, focuses on providing a balanced experience at a potentially lower price point.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices cater to the average smartphone user who values a blend of performance, battery life, and decent camera capabilities. However, the M55's superior specs may attract users prioritizing multimedia consumption and gaming.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

While the G34 provides a solid foundation, the M55's advanced chipset positions it better for future software updates and demanding applications. Its superior display and camera also provide a more future-proof multimedia experience. The faster charging capabilities of the M55, while not explicitly stated in the provided data, are becoming increasingly important to consumers, aligning with a trend towards convenience and efficiency.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

Although both are solid mid-range contenders, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M55. The deciding factors are the superior display, more powerful processor (Snapdragon 7 Gen 1), and better video recording capabilities. While the price might be slightly higher, the long-term benefits of a smoother user experience, better future-proofing due to the more advanced chipset, and enhanced multimedia capabilities outweigh the cost difference for me. The AMOLED display technology offers a significant visual upgrade over the IPS LCD in the Moto G34. Finally, the inclusion of optical image stabilization (OIS) and electronic image stabilization (EIS) in the M55's camera signifies a commitment to higher quality video recording, an increasingly important feature in today's mobile landscape.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.