Motorola Moto G23 vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 184.3 g 180 g
Height 162.7 mm 163.9 mm
Width 74.7 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Steel Blue
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G23Samsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8M55 slightly taller and wider, both slim. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)184.3180M55 slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED+M55 offers significantly better contrast, color accuracy, and outdoor visibility with AMOLED+.
Display Size (inches)6.56.7M55 has a slightly larger screen, providing more immersive content consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400M55 has a much sharper display due to higher resolution, resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120M55 provides smoother scrolling and animations thanks to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)400 (peak)1000 (HBM)M55 should be significantly brighter, especially in direct sunlight, making it easier to read outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)M55 offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to a more powerful and modern chipset.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)M55 has a more powerful CPU architecture, resulting in faster app loading, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 644M55 has a much more powerful GPU, leading to significantly better gaming performance and smoother graphics.
RAM (GB)4/88M55 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar megapixel count, but image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and other factors not specified.
Selfie Camera (MP)1650M55 has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with OIS, EISM55 offers much better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and chipset efficiency.
Fast Charging30W45WM55 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G23 Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price (depending on specific configuration).

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 outperforms Helio G85 by a wide margin.
  • Superior display: AMOLED+ offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and better outdoor visibility. Higher resolution and refresh rate enhance visual experience.
  • Enhanced camera capabilities: 4K video recording with OIS and EIS, higher resolution selfie camera.
  • Faster charging: 45W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to 30W.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G23: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality (calls, messaging, social media) and light usage.

Samsung Galaxy M55: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, better camera capabilities, and faster charging. Suitable for gaming, content consumption, and more demanding tasks.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G23 is likely cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the G23 may suffice. For demanding tasks and multimedia, the M55 is superior.
  3. How important are display quality, camera performance, and overall speed? The M55 excels in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

While the Moto G23 might be a decent budget option, the Samsung Galaxy M55 offers a significantly superior overall package. The performance difference alone is substantial, making the M55 a much more future-proof device. The improved display, camera, and faster charging further solidify its advantage. While price is a factor, the noticeable improvements in user experience offered by the M55 make it the better choice for most users, assuming the price difference is within a reasonable range. The jump in performance, display quality, and camera features justifies the likely higher cost. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 provides a much smoother and more responsive experience compared to the Helio G85, making it a more enjoyable device to use daily. The superior AMOLED display is also a huge plus, offering richer colors and deeper blacks.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.