Motorola Moto G22 vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 4, 2022 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 104.55 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 185 g 180 g
Height 164 mm 163.9 mm
Width 75 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Cosmic Black
  • Mint Green
  • Iceberg Blue
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.82 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G22 vs. Samsung Galaxy M55: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's delve into the user experience each device offers.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMotorola Moto G22Samsung Galaxy M55User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android, clean interfaceSamsung One UI, feature-rich, potentially overwhelmingMoto G22 offers a simpler, potentially more intuitive experience for new users. M55 offers more customization.
Interaction Flow90Hz refresh rate, smooth but not exceptional120Hz refresh rate, noticeably smoother transitionsM55 offers a more fluid and responsive user experience, particularly in visually demanding tasks.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsOne UI accessibility suite, potentially more robustM55 likely offers more comprehensive accessibility features, catering to a wider range of user needs.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, thicker, slightly heavierSlimmer, lighter, more comfortable for extended useM55 offers a more comfortable handheld experience, especially during prolonged use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student capturing lecture notes and creating video presentations.

  • Moto G22: The 90Hz display provides decent smoothness while note-taking. However, the HD+ resolution might make detailed diagrams less clear. Video editing would be limited by the slower processor.
  • M55: The sharp AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate makes reading and editing notes a visual treat. The powerful Snapdragon processor and 4K video recording capabilities allow for creating high-quality presentations. Faster charging means less downtime between classes.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a senior citizen: The Moto G22's simpler interface might be easier to learn. However, the M55's brighter, sharper display and larger text options (thanks to One UI) could be beneficial for visual clarity.
  • For a budget-conscious gamer: The M55's superior processor and smoother display make it the clear winner for gaming performance.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

  • Prioritize simplicity and affordability: Moto G22
  • Prioritize performance, display quality, and future-proofing: Samsung Galaxy M55

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M55.

Why? While the Moto G22 offers a clean, simple experience, the M55's significant advantages in performance, display quality, and camera capabilities are undeniable. The smoother 120Hz AMOLED display, faster charging, significantly more powerful processor, and higher resolution camera make it a more compelling device for a wider range of users. As a technology enthusiast who values a responsive and visually engaging experience, the M55 aligns better with my needs. Its superior features offer greater future-proofing, ensuring a satisfying user experience for a longer period. The slimmer design and lighter weight also contribute to a more comfortable everyday use. The investment in the M55 translates to a more enjoyable and productive mobile experience in the long run.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.