Motorola Moto G14 vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 8, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.35 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 177 g 180 g
Height 161.5 mm 163.9 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sky Blue
  • Steel Gray
  • Butter Cream
  • Pale Lilac
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.44 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G14Samsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.5 x 73.8 x 8 mm163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mmM55 slightly larger and heavier. Negligible difference in hand feel for most users.
Weight177g180gM55 slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based. Under-display is often perceived as more modern.
Display
Size6.5"6.7"M55 offers a slightly larger viewing area for media consumption.
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED+, 120HzM55's AMOLED provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency. 120Hz refresh rate results in significantly smoother animations and scrolling.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, but pixel density is slightly lower on the M55 due to the larger screen size. Difference is negligible.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzM55's 120Hz significantly improves smoothness and responsiveness compared to the G14's unspecified (likely 60Hz) refresh rate.
BrightnessNot specified1000 nits (HBM)M55's high brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Lack of data for the G14 prevents a complete comparison.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and improved gaming capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)M55's CPU architecture is newer and more powerful.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 644Adreno 644 provides a substantial improvement in graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM8GB8GBEqual RAM capacity.
Storage256GB256GBEqual storage capacity.
Camera
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)M55 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with 4K resolution, Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSame battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and display type; the M55's AMOLED might offer better efficiency.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14M55 comes with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTGBoth have USB-C, but the M55 also supports On-The-Go (OTG) for connecting peripherals.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G14 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Belonging to the "low price" range, it likely offers better affordability.

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate delivers a significantly better visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 outperforms the Unisoc T616 in all aspects.
  • Enhanced Camera Capabilities: 4K video recording with OIS and EIS enables higher quality video capture.
  • More Recent Software: Ships with Android 14, offering potential advantages in features and updates.
  • Added Features: OTG support expands connectivity options.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G14: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, and light app usage. Not recommended for demanding tasks or gaming.

Samsung Galaxy M55: Users who value a smooth and responsive user experience, enjoy media consumption and gaming, and require a capable camera.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The G14 is likely much cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? The M55 excels in performance and media consumption.
  3. How important is display quality and smoothness? The M55's 120Hz AMOLED display is a major differentiator.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget: Moto G14
  • Balanced Needs and Budget: Samsung Galaxy M55
  • Power User/Gamer/Media Enthusiast: Samsung Galaxy M55

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

While the Motorola Moto G14 might be a decent option for extremely budget-conscious buyers, the Samsung Galaxy M55 offers significantly better value overall. The superior display, performance, camera, and newer software make it a more future-proof and enjoyable device to use. The price difference is likely justified by these substantial improvements in user experience. The 120Hz AMOLED display alone is a compelling reason to choose the M55, as it drastically improves the feel of daily interactions. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 ensures smooth performance even for demanding tasks, making the M55 a more versatile device.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.