Motorola Moto G14 vs Motorola Edge 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 8, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.35 cm³ 100.31 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 177 g 197 g
Height 161.5 mm 161.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 72.4 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sky Blue
  • Steel Gray
  • Butter Cream
  • Pale Lilac
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Forest Grey
  • Nordic Wood

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.44 mAh/cm³ 44.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G14Motorola Edge 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.5 x 73.8 x 8 mm161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mmVirtually identical in hand feel.
Weight177g197gEdge 50 Ultra noticeably heavier; may impact one-handed use for some.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Size6.5"6.7"Edge 50 Ultra offers slightly larger viewing area.
TypeIPS LCDP-OLEDEdge 50 Ultra provides deeper blacks, richer colors, and better power efficiency.
Resolution1080 x 24001220 x 2712Edge 50 Ultra sharper; noticeable difference in detail.
Refresh RateNot specified144HzEdge 50 Ultra significantly smoother for scrolling, gaming, and animations. G14's refresh rate is unknown.
Peak BrightnessNot specified2500 nitsEdge 50 Ultra dramatically brighter; exceptional outdoor visibility. G14's brightness is unknown and cannot be compared.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Edge 50 Ultra vastly more powerful; significant difference in speed, multitasking, and demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Edge 50 Ultra's CPU significantly faster and more efficient.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 735Edge 50 Ultra offers dramatically better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM8GB16GBEdge 50 Ultra allows for more apps to run in the background and smoother multitasking.
Storage256GB512GBEdge 50 Ultra offers double the storage.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30fpsUp to 1080p@960fpsEdge 50 Ultra offers significantly better video recording capabilities, including higher resolution, frame rates, and slow-motion options. Specific sensor details are missing for comparison.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4500 mAhG14 has a larger battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on numerous factors, including display and processor efficiency.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14Edge 50 Ultra comes with a newer OS version, offering potential feature and security advantages. It will also receive more OS updates.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4Edge 50 Ultra offers significantly faster data transfer and display output capabilities.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G14 Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life: Larger battery capacity, though real-world usage will vary.
  • Lower price: Positioned in the "low price" range.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior processor, GPU, and RAM for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: OLED technology with higher resolution, refresh rate, and brightness.
  • More advanced camera features: Higher resolution and frame rate video recording capabilities.
  • Faster charging and data transfer: USB 3.1 Gen2 support.
  • Newer OS with longer support: Android 14 with guaranteed updates to Android 17.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G14: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, social media.

Edge 50 Ultra: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and advanced camera features for gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The G14 is a budget option, while the Edge 50 Ultra is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Edge 50 Ultra offers a significantly better visual experience and overall speed.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra

While the Moto G14 offers excellent value for its price, the Edge 50 Ultra is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance, stunning display, advanced camera features, and future-proof software updates justify the higher price. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to handle demanding tasks and gaming, making the Edge 50 Ultra the better choice for my needs. The longer software support commitment is also a huge deciding factor. While battery life is a concern, I would rather have a slightly shorter battery life with a much better overall user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.