Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 189 g 180 g
Height 164 mm 163.9 mm
Width 75 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Samsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8M55 slightly shorter, narrower, and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)189180M55 slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without more information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDM55 offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.56.7M55 has a slightly larger screen, providing a more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400M55 boasts much higher resolution resulting in sharper text and images. Noticeably better for media consumption.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
PPI270393M55's significantly higher pixel density leads to sharper visuals and text.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 7 Gen 1M55's 7 Gen 1 chip offers significantly better performance in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)M55's CPU architecture and higher clock speeds translate to noticeably faster performance.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 644M55's GPU is more powerful, resulting in smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM4GB8GBM55's double the RAM enables better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera48MP50MPWhile M55 has slightly higher resolution, real-world image quality depends on sensor size and processing, which are not fully specified.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with OIS, EISM55 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on software optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Generally, Moto G phones are more budget-friendly.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers access to faster mobile data networks where available.

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Display: The Super AMOLED display with higher resolution provides a superior viewing experience.
  • Much Faster Performance: The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 and 8GB RAM offer significantly better performance for demanding tasks and multitasking.
  • Superior Camera Capabilities: 4K video recording with stabilization, potentially better low-light performance (depending on unspecified sensor details).
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023):

  • Budget-conscious users: Prioritize affordability over top-tier specs.
  • Light users: Primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and browsing.

Samsung Galaxy M55:

  • Power users: Engage in demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or heavy multitasking.
  • Multimedia enthusiasts: Value a high-quality display and excellent camera capabilities for media consumption and creation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G (2023) is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the Moto G may suffice. For demanding tasks, the M55 is better.
  3. How important is display and camera quality? The M55 offers significant advantages in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

While pricing information is incomplete, the Samsung Galaxy M55 offers a significantly better overall package. The superior display, much faster performance, enhanced camera capabilities, and inclusion of NFC make it a more compelling device for a wider range of users. While the Moto G (2023) might be a suitable option for extremely budget-conscious buyers with basic needs, the M55's advantages in key areas like performance and display justify the likely price difference for most users. The jump from a Snapdragon 480+ to a 7 Gen 1 is substantial, guaranteeing a smoother and more responsive user experience in the long run. The AMOLED display is a major differentiator, providing richer visuals for everyday use.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.