Motorola Moto E13 vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 180 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.9 mm
Width 75 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Samsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8M55 slightly wider, thinner
Weight (g)179.5180Negligible weight difference
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED+M55 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles
Display Size (inches)6.56.7M55 has a slightly larger screen
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400M55 significantly sharper and more detailed (393 ppi vs 270 ppi)
Refresh RateNot specified120HzM55 provides smoother scrolling and animations
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)M55 drastically more powerful for demanding tasks and gaming
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz A710 & 3x2.36 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)M55 offers superior processing speed and efficiency
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 644M55 delivers considerably better graphics performance
RAM2/4 GB8 GBM55 allows for significantly better multitasking and app performance
Camera
Rear Camera13 MP50 MP (Main) + 8 MP (Wide) + 2 MP (Macro)M55 offers higher resolution, versatility with wide and macro lenses, and potentially better image quality
Front Camera5 MP50 MPM55 boasts a much higher resolution front camera for better selfies
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsM55 capable of recording much higher resolution video
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity
Fast Charging10W45WM55 charges significantly faster
OtherNFCM55 supports contactless payments and data transfer

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Much faster processor, more RAM, and better GPU for smoother operation and demanding tasks.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, and 120Hz refresh rate provide a vastly improved visual experience.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, versatile lens options, and 4K video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly faster charging speeds minimize downtime.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other functionalities.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster data speeds and improved network performance in areas with 5G coverage.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality (calling, texting, web browsing) and don't engage in demanding tasks or gaming. Ideal for:

  • First-time smartphone users: Simple and easy to use.
  • Secondary phone: For basic communication needs.

Samsung Galaxy M55: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, a versatile camera system, and faster charging. Suitable for:

  • Mobile gamers: Smooth performance for demanding games.
  • Content consumers: Enjoying high-resolution video and vibrant visuals.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Capturing high-quality photos and videos.
  • Power users: Multitasking and running resource-intensive applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks/gaming/media consumption.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Display quality, performance, camera, battery life, charging speed.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Moto E13
  • Balanced Needs and Budget: Consider other mid-range options besides the M55 that might offer better value.
  • Performance and Features Prioritized: Samsung Galaxy M55

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M55

While the Moto E13 offers an incredibly low price point, the Samsung Galaxy M55 provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, powerful performance, versatile camera system, faster charging, and inclusion of NFC justify the higher price for most users. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, coupled with 8GB of RAM, ensures smooth performance for years to come. The jump in display quality from an LCD to a 120Hz Super AMOLED+ is a game-changer for everyday usage. While budget is always a factor, the long-term benefits and enhanced user experience of the M55 make it a more compelling choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.