Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 15, 2024 August 30, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 100.31 cm³ 109.67 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 197 g 211 g
Height 161.1 mm 171.9 mm
Width 72.4 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Forest Grey
  • Nordic Wood
  • Midnight Black
  • Starry Blue
  • Sage Green
  • Dreamy Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.88 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 720 x 1640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 84 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 2500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 109.01 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.86 mAh/cm³ 47.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5160 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 735 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 50 UltraXiaomi Redmi 14CPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mmThe Redmi 14C is noticeably larger and slightly thicker. The Edge 50 Ultra will feel more compact in hand.
Weight197g211gThe Edge 50 Ultra is lighter, contributing to a more comfortable one-handed use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and durability are unknown without further information.
Display
Display TypeP-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+IPS LCD, 120HzThe Edge 50 Ultra's P-OLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency. Its higher refresh rate results in smoother animations. HDR10+ support provides a wider dynamic range for compatible content.
Resolution1220 x 2712720 x 1640The Edge 50 Ultra has a significantly sharper display (446 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak Brightness2500 nits600 nits (HBM)The Edge 50 Ultra offers far superior brightness, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Mediatek Helio G81 UltraThe Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a flagship-level processor, significantly more powerful than the mid-range Helio G81 Ultra. Expect much faster performance and smoother multitasking on the Edge 50 Ultra.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)The Edge 50 Ultra's CPU architecture is more modern and powerful, enabling faster processing speeds.
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G52 MC2The Adreno 735 is considerably more powerful, offering a significantly better gaming and graphics-intensive application experience.
RAM16GB6GB/8GBThe Edge 50 Ultra's 16GB RAM allows for significantly better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Storage512GB128GBThe Edge 50 Ultra offers significantly more storage space for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 1080p@960fps (HDR, EIS)1080p@30fpsThe Edge 50 Ultra boasts significantly superior video recording capabilities, including higher resolution, frame rates, and slow-motion options. HDR and EIS further enhance video quality.
Battery
Capacity4500 mAh5160 mAhThe Redmi 14C has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, real-world battery life depends on various factors including display type and processor efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: The P-OLED with a 144Hz refresh rate and high resolution delivers a much better visual experience.
  • More versatile camera: Offers advanced video recording capabilities.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C Advantages:

  • Larger battery: Potentially longer battery life, but real-world usage will vary.
  • Potentially lower price: Although both are in the "medium price" range, the Redmi 14C is likely more affordable given its lower specifications.

Trade-offs:

  • The Edge 50 Ultra prioritizes performance and display quality over battery capacity and affordability.
  • The Redmi 14C offers a larger battery and potential affordability but compromises significantly on performance and display quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra: Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and advanced camera features. Suitable for power users, gamers, and content creators.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and battery life over performance and premium features. Best for users with light usage patterns focusing on communication, web browsing, and social media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 14C is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy users will appreciate the Edge 50 Ultra's performance.
  3. How important are display quality and camera features? The Edge 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 14C in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
  • Budget-conscious student: Xiaomi Redmi 14C
  • Photographer/Videographer: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
  • Casual user prioritizing battery life: Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.