Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Honor 200 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 15, 2024 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 100.31 cm³ 100.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.4 "/g 3.41 "/g
Weight 197 g 199 g
Height 161.1 mm 163.3 mm
Width 72.4 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Forest Grey
  • Nordic Wood
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 1224 x 2700
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 92.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 437 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 2500 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 100.25 mAh/in² 113.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.86 mAh/cm³ 51.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 735 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version 1.4 N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17 18

Comparison Summary

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs. Honor 200 Pro: Smartphone Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 50 UltraHonor 200 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2 mmThe Edge 50 Ultra is slightly shorter and narrower, but marginally thicker than the Honor 200 Pro. The differences are minimal and may not significantly impact in-hand feel.
Weight197g199gNegligible weight difference; both phones are relatively heavy.
Display
Size6.7"6.78"Minor size difference, likely imperceptible in real-world use.
TypeP-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2500 nits (peak)OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 4000 nits (peak)Both offer vibrant displays with over a billion colors. The Edge 50 Ultra's 144Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to the 120Hz on the Honor 200 Pro, especially noticeable in gaming. The Honor 200 Pro boasts a significantly higher peak brightness, making it more readable in direct sunlight.
Resolution1220 x 27121224 x 2700Virtually identical resolutions, resulting in similar sharpness.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Identical chipsets indicate similar performance capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Same CPU configuration, meaning comparable processing power.
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 735Identical GPUs, suggesting similar graphics performance.
RAM16GB12GBThe Edge 50 Ultra offers more RAM, potentially improving multitasking and demanding application performance.
Storage512GB512GBBoth phones offer ample storage.
Battery
Capacity4500 mAh5200 mAhThe Honor 200 Pro has a significantly larger battery, likely translating to longer battery life.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesExtensive options including up to 960fps slow-motionLimited to 4K@30fps and 1080p at various frame ratesThe Edge 50 Ultra offers significantly more versatile video recording options, particularly for slow-motion capture. Missing details regarding camera sensor specifications limit a comprehensive camera comparison.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both phones launch with the latest Android version.
OS Max Version1718The Honor 200 Pro will receive one more major Android update than the Edge 50 Ultra, potentially extending its software support lifespan.
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4USB Type-C 2.0, OTGThe Edge 50 Ultra offers faster data transfer and video output capabilities through its USB 3.1 Gen2 and DisplayPort support.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: The 144Hz refresh rate offers a noticeably smoother user experience.
  • More RAM: 16GB RAM provides better multitasking and performance headroom.
  • Versatile Video Recording: Extensive slow-motion and high-resolution options.
  • Faster Data Transfer: USB 3.1 Gen2 enables quicker file transfers.
  • DisplayPort: Supports connecting to external displays for a desktop-like experience.

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: 4000 nits peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger 5200 mAh battery capacity.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed to receive one more major Android update.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize a smooth display experience, heavy multitasking, high-quality video recording, and fast data transfer speeds. Gamers and power users would benefit from the higher refresh rate and RAM.

Honor 200 Pro: Suitable for users who value long battery life, excellent outdoor screen visibility, and extended software support. Users who primarily consume media and prioritize all-day usage would find this phone appealing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display smoothness and responsiveness? Prioritize the Edge 50 Ultra if a high refresh rate is crucial.
  2. What is your typical usage pattern? Choose the Honor 200 Pro if battery life is a primary concern.
  3. How important is long-term software support? The Honor 200 Pro offers a longer update cycle.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Gamer: Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
  • Outdoor Enthusiast: Honor 200 Pro
  • Average User: Consider individual priorities regarding battery life, display smoothness, and software updates. Both phones offer excellent value in the medium price range.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.