Honor 200 Pro vs Motorola Moto G35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 31, 2024 September 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 100.7 cm³ 98.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.41 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 199 g 188 g
Height 163.3 mm 166.3 mm
Width 75.2 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan
  • Midnight Black
  • Sage Green
  • Leaf Green
  • Guava Red

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1224 x 2700 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.8 % 86.3 %
Pixel Density 437 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 4000 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 113.12 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.64 mAh/cm³ 50.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5200 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Unisoc T760 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 735 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureHonor 200 ProMotorola Moto G35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2 mm166.3 x 76 x 7.8 mmThe Moto G35 is slightly larger and wider but marginally thinner.
Weight199g188gThe Moto G35 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and durability cannot be compared without more information.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedUnder-display sensors are generally considered more modern and aesthetically pleasing, while side-mounted ones can be quicker to access.
Display
Display TypeOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDRIPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10The Honor's OLED display will offer significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially more vibrant colors.
Display Size6.78"6.72"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1224 x 27001080 x 2400The Honor 200 Pro has a sharper display with higher pixel density (437 ppi vs 392 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak Brightness4000 nits1000 nitsThe Honor 200 Pro will be significantly more readable in direct sunlight.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth phones offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the high refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Unisoc T760 (6nm)The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a flagship-level processor, significantly more powerful than the mid-range Unisoc T760. Expect much better performance in demanding tasks and gaming on the Honor.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55)The Honor's CPU configuration offers superior performance with faster clock speeds and a more powerful core architecture.
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G57The Adreno 735 provides significantly better graphics performance for gaming and other visually demanding applications.
RAM12GB8GBMore RAM in the Honor allows for smoother multitasking and better performance with multiple apps open.
Storage512GB128GBThe Honor offers significantly more storage space for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)4K@30fps, 1080p@30fpsThe Honor offers more video recording options, including 1080p at 60fps and optical image stabilization (OIS) at multiple resolutions for smoother footage. OIS and EIS details are missing for the Moto G35's 4K recording.
Specific Sensor DetailsMissing for bothMissing for bothDetailed camera sensor specifications (e.g., megapixels, aperture) are needed for a comprehensive comparison.
Battery
Capacity5200 mAh5000 mAhThe Honor has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering slightly longer battery life. Real-world usage will vary significantly depending on usage patterns.
Charging SpeedNot SpecifiedNot SpecifiedCharging speed comparison is not possible without more information.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers a substantial performance advantage over the Unisoc T760.
  • Superior Display: The OLED display with higher resolution and peak brightness provides a dramatically better visual experience.
  • More Storage: 512GB offers ample space compared to 128GB.
  • More Versatile Video Recording: Offers OIS and EIS for smoother footage and higher frame rate options.

Motorola Moto G35 Advantages:

  • Lighter: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Potentially Lower Price: While both are mid-range, the Moto G35 may be more affordable given its less powerful specs.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Honor 200 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, ample storage, and advanced camera features. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking.

Motorola Moto G35: Suitable for users who prioritize a lightweight phone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography. A good option for budget-conscious users who don't require top-tier performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Honor 200 Pro will likely be more expensive.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? (Gaming, photography, social media, etc.)
  3. Which features are most important to you? (Performance, display quality, battery life, camera)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Honor 200 Pro for its superior performance and graphics capabilities.
  • Photographer/Videographer: Honor 200 Pro, assuming its unspecified camera sensor is comparable or better, for its superior video recording capabilities and potentially better image quality. More information is needed to make a definitive recommendation.
  • Casual User: Motorola Moto G35 for its lighter weight, potentially lower price, and sufficient performance for everyday tasks.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.