Google Pixel Fold vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 128.59 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.69 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 283 g 180 g
Height 139.7 mm 163.9 mm
Width 158.7 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 5.8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 7.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1840 x 2208 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 16:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.7 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 378 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1450 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 83.47 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 37.49 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4821 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G710 MP7 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureGoogle Pixel FoldSamsung Galaxy M55Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardPixel Fold offers greater versatility with its foldable design, enabling both phone and tablet functionality. M55 is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions (mm)139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 (folded)163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8Pixel Fold is more compact when folded but wider unfolded. M55 is thinner overall.
Weight (g)283180Pixel Fold is significantly heavier due to its folding mechanism and larger battery. M55 offers a more lightweight, pocketable experience.
Display
Display TypeFoldable OLEDSuper AMOLEDPixel Fold's folding OLED allows for a larger screen in a smaller form factor. Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks thanks to OLED technology.
Display Size (inches)7.6 (unfolded), 5.8 (folded)6.7Pixel Fold's unfolded screen provides a tablet-like experience. M55 has a large display for a standard phone.
Resolution (pixels)1840 x 2208 (unfolded), 1080 x 2092 (folded)1080 x 2400Pixel Fold offers higher resolution, especially when unfolded, resulting in sharper images and text.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both phones offer smooth scrolling and animations with a 120Hz refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G2 (5 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)Tensor G2 is optimized for AI and machine learning tasks. Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 generally offers good performance for everyday tasks and gaming. Direct performance comparison is difficult without benchmarks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)CPU specifications suggest comparable performance, but real-world usage may vary.
RAM (GB)128Pixel Fold's larger RAM allows for better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Camera
Rear Camera48MP Main, 10.8MP Wide, 10.8MP Telephoto50MP Main, 8MP Wide, 2MP MacroPixel Fold features a more versatile camera system with a higher resolution telephoto lens. M55 includes a dedicated macro lens, but its telephoto capabilities are limited by digital zoom.
DxOMark Score133Not AvailablePixel Fold's high DxOMark score indicates excellent camera performance. M55's camera quality is unknown without testing.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)48215000While M55 has a slightly larger battery capacity, Pixel Fold's larger display may consume more power. Real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Google Pixel Fold Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers versatility for different usage scenarios.
  • Higher Resolution Display: Provides a sharper visual experience.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Superior telephoto capabilities and overall image quality based on DxOMark score.
  • More RAM: Enables smoother multitasking.

Samsung Galaxy M55 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Thinner: More comfortable for one-handed use and portability.
  • Slightly Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life depending on usage.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Google Pixel Fold: Ideal for users who value productivity on the go, multimedia consumption on a larger screen, and high-quality photography. Use cases include: editing documents, watching videos, mobile gaming, and professional photography.

Samsung Galaxy M55: Suitable for users who prioritize a lightweight and affordable phone with a large display for everyday tasks. Use cases include: social media browsing, web surfing, casual gaming, and communication.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability versus screen size?
  2. Is a foldable design a priority?
  3. What is your budget?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Prioritize Productivity and Versatility: Pixel Fold
  • Prioritize Affordability and Portability: Galaxy M55

My Choice: Google Pixel Fold

While the Samsung Galaxy M55 offers a compelling price point, the Google Pixel Fold's innovative foldable design, superior camera system, and larger, higher-resolution display are more appealing to me. I value the versatility of having a tablet-sized screen in a pocketable device. The enhanced productivity and multimedia consumption experience outweigh the higher price and added weight. The Pixel Fold's stronger performance with 12GB of RAM and a more powerful processor, backed by the quantitative evidence of the DxOMark score, solidify my choice. Although battery life is a concern given the large display, I am willing to compromise for the Fold's unique features and capabilities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.