Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 4, 2024 October 3, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 118.89 cm³ 100.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.11 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 257 g 213 g
Height 155.2 mm 162 mm
Width 150.2 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 5.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 8 " 6.7 "
Resolution 2076 x 2152 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 16:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.5 % 88 %
Pixel Density 373 PPI 385 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2700 nits 1900 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 72.66 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.11 mAh/cm³ 46.92 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4650 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) Exynos 2400e (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)
GPU Mali-G715 MC7 Xclipse 940

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldSamsung Galaxy S24 FEPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1 mm (folded)162 x 77.3 x 8 mmPixel Fold is significantly wider and shorter when folded, potentially less pocketable but more comfortable for media consumption in unfolded state. S24 FE is a traditional candybar design, thinner and more pocketable.
Weight257g213gPixel Fold is noticeably heavier, potentially causing fatigue during extended use.
FoldableYesNoPixel Fold offers a larger screen real estate for multitasking and media consumption when unfolded. S24 FE offers a more traditional smartphone experience.
Display
Size8" (unfolded)6.7"Pixel Fold provides a significantly larger screen area for multitasking and media consumption.
TypeFoldable LTPO OLEDDynamic AMOLED 2XBoth offer excellent color accuracy and contrast. LTPO on Pixel Fold allows for more granular refresh rate control, potentially saving battery.
Resolution2076 x 21521080 x 2340Pixel Fold has a higher resolution, resulting in sharper text and images, especially beneficial on a larger screen.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness2700 nits1900 nitsPixel Fold offers significantly higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4 (4 nm)Exynos 2400e (4 nm)Performance differences likely, but real-world impact depends on optimization. Tensor G4 is expected to excel in AI tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)Core configuration differences exist, requiring benchmarks for accurate performance comparison.
GPUMali-G715 MC7Xclipse 940GPU performance differences likely, impacting gaming and graphically demanding tasks. Benchmarks needed for clear comparison.
RAM16GB8GBPixel Fold offers double the RAM, allowing for more efficient multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Storage512GB256GB/512GBPixel Fold offers a single high storage option, while S24 FE offers more choices.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@60fps (HDR, OIS, EIS), 1080p@240fpsUp to 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps, 1080p@960fpsBoth offer extensive video recording options. S24 FE boasts higher resolution (8K) and higher frame rate slow-motion (960fps). Detailed camera sensor specifications are needed for comprehensive comparison.
Battery
Capacity4650 mAh4700 mAhS24 FE has a slightly larger battery, however, the Pixel Fold's LTPO display could potentially offset this difference in real-world usage. Foldable displays often consume more power.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Advantages:

  • Larger, Foldable Display: Enables enhanced multitasking, immersive media consumption, and unique software experiences.
  • More RAM: Facilitates smoother multitasking and handles demanding applications more efficiently.
  • Higher Peak Brightness: Ensures superior outdoor visibility.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Offers a more accessible price point for budget-conscious consumers.
  • Lighter and More Pocketable: Easier to carry and use for extended periods.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Slightly larger battery and traditional display might result in longer battery life, although real-world usage will vary.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Offers 8K recording and higher frame rate slow-motion capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Ideal for users who prioritize a large screen for productivity and media consumption, value innovative technology, and are willing to pay a premium. Use cases include multitasking, content creation, and immersive gaming/video experiences.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: Ideal for users seeking a balance of performance, features, and affordability. Suitable for everyday tasks, social media, gaming, and capturing high-quality videos.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is a foldable screen essential? Consider whether the benefits of a larger, foldable display outweigh the added cost and bulk.
  2. What is your budget? The Pixel Fold falls in a significantly higher price range.
  3. What are your primary use cases? Consider whether you prioritize multitasking, media consumption, portability, or specific camera features.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Power User/Content Creator: Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers the larger screen and multitasking capabilities needed for demanding workflows.
  • Budget-Conscious Consumer: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE provides excellent value and performance at a more affordable price.
  • On-the-Go User: S24 FE's lighter weight and pocketability might be preferred for users constantly on the move.

Note: This analysis is based on available specifications. Real-world performance, camera quality, and battery life may vary. Hands-on reviews are crucial for a definitive assessment. Missing specifications, particularly detailed camera sensor information, limit a complete comparison.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.