Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 4, 2024 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 118.89 cm³ 88.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.11 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 257 g 199 g
Height 155.2 mm 149.6 mm
Width 150.2 mm 71.5 mm
Thickness 5.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Natural Titanium
  • Desert Titanium

Display

Screen Size 8 " 6.3 "
Resolution 2076 x 2152 1206 x 2622
Aspect Ratio 16:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.5 % 90.9 %
Pixel Density 373 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness 1600 nits 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 2700 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 72.66 mAh/in² 90.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.11 mAh/cm³ 40.35 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4650 mAh 3582 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)
GPU Mali-G715 MC7 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 14 18
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Apple iPhone 16 Pro: A Deep Dive

The smartphone arena heats up with the arrival of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro. Both devices boast impressive specs, but their distinct approaches to mobile technology cater to different needs. Let's dissect these powerhouses to uncover which reigns supreme for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldApple iPhone 16 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions155.2 x 150.2 x 5.1 mm149.6 x 71.5 x 8.3 mmFold's larger, heavier; iPhone pocketable
Weight257g199gFold's heft noticeable in prolonged use; iPhone feels lighter
FoldableYesNoFold offers expansive screen real estate, multi-tasking; iPhone classic slab design
Display
Size8" (Unfolded)6.3"Fold provides tablet-like experience; iPhone single-screen convenience
TypeFoldable LTPO OLEDLTPO Super Retina XDR OLEDFold's crease may be visible; both offer smooth scrolling & vibrant colors
Resolution2076 x 21521206 x 2622Fold's lower pixel density noticeable in tablet mode; iPhone sharper images
Peak Brightness2700 nits2000 nits (HBM)Fold excels in direct sunlight; both bright enough for most conditions
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4 (4nm)Apple A18 Pro (3nm)A18 Pro likely offers performance edge; both handle demanding tasks smoothly
CPUOcta-coreHexa-coreCore count difference less impactful than architectural efficiency; real-world performance testing needed
GPUMali-G715 MC7Apple GPU (6-core)Apple's custom GPU generally strong in graphics-intensive tasks
RAM16GB8GBFold's larger RAM benefits multitasking; iPhone's optimized OS mitigates RAM difference
Storage512GB256GB/512GB/1TBiPhone offers greater storage flexibility
Battery Life
Capacity4650 mAh3582 mAhFold's larger battery likely translates to longer usage; real-world testing crucial
Other
OSAndroid 14iOS 18Platform preference subjective; impacts app ecosystem and customization

Note: Camera specifications were omitted due to their absence in the provided data. A comprehensive comparison necessitates detailed camera information.

2. Key Insights

  • Form Factor Revolution: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's defining feature is its foldable display, transforming from a phone to a mini-tablet. This expands productivity and content consumption possibilities but comes with added weight and potential crease visibility. The iPhone 16 Pro sticks to a refined, familiar design, prioritizing portability and single-screen ease.

  • Performance Parity, Potential Edge: While the A18 Pro's 3nm process suggests a performance advantage, the Tensor G4, coupled with 16GB RAM, could excel in specific AI-driven tasks and heavy multitasking. Real-world benchmarks will ultimately determine the winner.

  • Battery Endurance vs. Portability: The Fold's larger battery promises extended use, crucial for powering its expansive display. The iPhone prioritizes sleekness and lightness, potentially compromising battery life.

  • Ecosystem and Experience: The choice between Android and iOS hinges on personal preference. Android offers greater customization, while iOS is known for its simplicity and app optimization.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Ideal for power users, multitaskers, content creators, and those who value a large screen for productivity and entertainment on the go. The premium price reflects its cutting-edge technology.

  • iPhone 16 Pro: Suited for users who prioritize a refined, pocketable design, a seamless user experience within the Apple ecosystem, and consistent performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is a foldable screen essential to your workflow and entertainment? If yes, the Fold's transformative design is compelling. If not, the iPhone's classic form factor might suffice.

  2. Which operating system aligns with your preferences and existing digital ecosystem? Consider app compatibility, customization options, and overall user experience.

  3. What's your budget and tolerance for compromises? The Fold commands a higher price for its innovative design. The iPhone offers a more affordable entry point within the premium segment, potentially with less storage. Evaluate your needs and prioritize accordingly.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.