Google Pixel 8 vs Samsung Galaxy M55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 12, 2023 March 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 94.83 cm³ 97.8 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.32 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 187 g 180 g
Height 150.5 mm 163.9 mm
Width 70.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mint
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Rose
  • Light Green
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.2 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.1 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 428 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1400 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 2000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.02 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.24 mAh/cm³ 51.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4575 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Immortalis-G715s MC10 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Google Pixel 8 and the Samsung Galaxy M55, dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into practical, real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureGoogle Pixel 8Samsung Galaxy M55Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions150.5 x 70.8 x 8.9 mm163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mmPixel 8 is noticeably smaller and slightly thicker. M55 is larger.
Weight187g180gNegligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Size6.2 inches6.7 inchesM55 offers a larger screen for media consumption.
TypeOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits peakSuper AMOLED+, 120Hz, 1000 nitsPixel 8 boasts superior brightness and HDR for vibrant visuals.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution; sharpness comparable on both devices.
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G3 (4nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Tensor G3 expected to deliver superior AI and overall performance.
CPUNona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3...)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710...)Pixel 8's more powerful CPU likely translates to smoother multitasking.
GPUImmortalis-G715s MC10Adreno 644Pixel 8's GPU should provide a better gaming and graphics experience.
RAM8GB8GBSame RAM capacity; multitasking performance should be comparable.
Storage256GB256GBEqual storage capacity for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera (Partial)
Video Capabilities4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@ up to 240fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fpsPixel 8 offers significantly more versatile video recording options, including higher frame rates and slow-motion.
Battery
Capacity4575 mAh5000 mAhM55 has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version with expected feature parity.
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0Pixel 8 offers faster data transfer speeds.

2. Key Insights

The Pixel 8 shines with its superior display, promising a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience thanks to its brighter panel and HDR capabilities. Its Tensor G3 chip and advanced GPU deliver a significant performance advantage, particularly for demanding tasks and gaming. The versatile video recording capabilities cater to content creators and those who value capturing high-quality footage.

The Galaxy M55 counters with a larger display and a significantly bigger battery, potentially translating to longer usage between charges. It offers a more budget-friendly option while still providing a smooth 120Hz display and ample storage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Pixel 8: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, camera quality (implied based on historical Pixel performance), a premium display, and the latest software features. Power users, gamers, photographers, and videographers would likely prefer the Pixel 8.

Galaxy M55: Suitable for users seeking a larger screen, long battery life, and a more affordable price point. Those who primarily use their phones for media consumption, browsing, and communication might find the M55 a compelling option.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Pixel 8 typically sits at a higher price point than the M55.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Heavy gaming or content creation favors the Pixel 8; media consumption and extended battery life lean towards the M55.
  3. How important is display quality and overall performance? The Pixel 8 demonstrably excels in these areas.

My Choice: Google Pixel 8

While the Galaxy M55 offers a tempting combination of a large display and battery, the Pixel 8's superior performance, brighter and more vibrant display, and advanced video capabilities are decisive factors for me. I value a smooth, responsive user experience, excellent image quality (which Pixel phones are known for), and the cutting-edge technology that Google consistently delivers. The slightly smaller form factor of the Pixel 8 is also more appealing to me personally. While battery life is important, I prioritize the overall user experience and the capabilities that the Pixel 8 brings to the table. The faster USB standard is also a plus for quick data transfers. Ultimately, the Pixel 8 feels like a more future-proof investment, offering a more compelling blend of performance, features, and innovation.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.