Google Pixel 6 Pro vs Nothing Phone (1) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 28, 2021 July 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 110.72 cm³ 100.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.19 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 210 g 193.5 g
Height 163.9 mm 159.2 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stormy Black
  • Cloudy White
  • Sorta Sunny
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1440 x 3120 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.6 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 512 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.45 mAh/in² 104.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.19 mAh/cm³ 44.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5003 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G78 MP20 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14 15

Comparison Summary

Pixel 6 Pro vs. Nothing Phone (1): A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the Google Pixel 6 Pro and the Nothing Phone (1) as experiences, not just devices. We'll uncover how design choices translate into real-world use for diverse individuals.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeaturePixel 6 ProNothing Phone (1)User Experience Impact
Interface DesignClean, minimalist Android with Google's Material YouUnique Glyph Interface, near-stock AndroidPixel offers familiarity, Nothing provides a distinctive visual identity with its LED notification system. Choice depends on user preference.
Interaction FlowSmooth, intuitive thanks to Tensor chip and 120Hz LTPO displayGenerally smooth with 120Hz OLED, but occasional hiccups reportedPixel consistently delivers a fluid experience; Nothing's performance can be slightly less predictable.
Accessibility FeaturesExtensive suite of Android accessibility optionsStandard Android accessibility featuresBoth offer core accessibility, but Pixel's integration with Google services might provide a slight edge.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, heavier; curved display can be polarizingLighter, flatter sides; more comfortable for someNothing's lighter weight and flatter edges might be preferred for one-handed use. Pixel's larger display offers more screen real estate.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional, Sarah, constantly juggling calls, emails, and social media.

  • Pixel 6 Pro: Sarah appreciates the seamless multitasking powered by the Tensor chip. The bright, adaptive 120Hz LTPO display makes scrolling through emails and presentations a breeze. Google Assistant anticipates her needs, proactively offering traffic updates before her commute.

  • Nothing Phone (1): Sarah enjoys the Glyph Interface's unique notification system. She customizes LED patterns for specific contacts, allowing her to prioritize messages without constantly checking her screen. The phone's distinctive design sparks conversations and reflects her personal style.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

  • For a senior user: The Pixel's clean interface and larger text options might be easier to navigate. Google Assistant's voice commands can be particularly helpful for those with dexterity challenges. The Nothing Phone's Glyph system, while visually engaging, might be overwhelming for some older users.

  • For a creative professional: The Pixel's superior camera system and smooth performance are ideal for photo and video editing. The Nothing Phone's unique aesthetic and customizable Glyphs might appeal to those seeking a device that reflects their artistic sensibilities.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing the right device hinges on prioritizing personal needs:

  • Prioritize Performance and Seamlessness: Pixel 6 Pro
  • Prioritize Unique Design and Customization: Nothing Phone (1)

Ultimately, both phones offer compelling experiences. The decision should be based on individual preferences and how each device aligns with a user's lifestyle and technological comfort level.

My Choice: Google Pixel 6 Pro

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Google Pixel 6 Pro. While the Nothing Phone (1)'s Glyph Interface is innovative and visually striking, I prioritize the consistent performance and seamless user experience offered by the Pixel 6 Pro. The Tensor chip's AI capabilities, coupled with the smooth LTPO display, create a truly fluid and intuitive interaction. Furthermore, the Pixel's superior camera system and tight integration with Google's ecosystem align perfectly with my needs as a technology communicator who values capturing and sharing high-quality visuals. Finally, the mature and refined software experience of the Pixel ensures a reliable and predictable user journey, which I find essential for productivity and creative endeavors. While I appreciate Nothing's bold design language, the Pixel's user-centered approach resonates more strongly with my personal philosophy and professional requirements.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.