Google Pixel 6 Pro vs Huawei nova 11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 28, 2021 April 27, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 110.72 cm³ 83.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.19 "/g 3.99 "/g
Weight 210 g 168 g
Height 163.9 mm 161.3 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 6.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Stormy Black
  • Cloudy White
  • Sorta Sunny
  • Gold
  • Black
  • White
  • Green

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1440 x 3120 1084 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.6 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 512 PPI 391 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.45 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.19 mAh/cm³ 53.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5003 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Google Tensor (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670)
GPU Mali-G78 MP20 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android N/A
Initial OS Version 12 N/A
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Pixel 6 Pro vs. Huawei nova 11: A Tale of Two Experiences

As a technology communications specialist, my goal isn't just to compare specs, but to paint a picture of how these devices feel in your hands and how they integrate into your life. Let's delve into the Google Pixel 6 Pro and the Huawei nova 11, focusing on the human experience they offer.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePixel 6 ProHuawei nova 11User Experience Impact
Interface DesignClean, minimalist Android with Material YouEMUI (if available), potentially less cohesivePixel's cohesive design language offers a more predictable and intuitive experience, enhancing usability and aesthetic appeal.
Interaction FlowSmooth, thanks to Google Tensor and 120Hz LTPO displayPotentially smooth with 120Hz OLED, but Snapdragon 778G may show minor performance differencesPixel 6 Pro likely offers a more consistently fluid experience, especially in demanding tasks.
AccessibilityRobust Android accessibility featuresDependent on EMUI versionAndroid traditionally boasts strong accessibility features, giving Pixel an edge. Huawei's accessibility depends heavily on EMUI features and support.
ErgonomicsLarger, heavier (210g)Slimmer, lighter (168g)Nova 11 wins in portability, but Pixel's weight might convey a premium feel. Ultimately, personal preference dictates the more comfortable device.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional juggling emails, video calls, and social media.

  • Pixel 6 Pro: The Tensor chip seamlessly handles multitasking, ensuring a smooth transition between apps. The vibrant LTPO display dynamically adjusts its refresh rate, conserving battery while providing a fluid visual experience. Its superior camera system captures crisp, detailed photos and videos, even in challenging lighting conditions. This translates to a stress-free workflow, effortlessly capturing important moments with professional quality.

  • Huawei nova 11: The Nova 11, with its Snapdragon 778G, handles everyday tasks competently. The OLED display offers vibrant colors, and the 120Hz refresh rate ensures a smooth scrolling experience. The impressive 60MP selfie camera caters to the selfie enthusiast, offering detailed self-portraits. However, the lack of Google Mobile Services might hinder app availability and overall user experience for certain users reliant on the Google ecosystem. This makes the phone more suitable for users who prioritize a slim and stylish device with strong selfie capabilities.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Power User: The Pixel 6 Pro, with its powerful Tensor chip and superior camera system, caters to users demanding top-tier performance and imaging capabilities.

  • Casual User: The Nova 11's sleek design and strong selfie camera might appeal to users prioritizing aesthetics and social media engagement. However, the absence of Google services could be a significant drawback for some.

  • User with Accessibility Needs: The Pixel 6 Pro benefits from Android's robust accessibility features, making it a potentially better choice for users with specific requirements. However, it is critical to evaluate the accessibility features in the specific EMUI version of the Huawei Nova 11, as newer versions may include substantial improvements.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Pixel 6 Pro prioritizes performance and a cohesive software experience, making it ideal for power users and those heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. The Nova 11 focuses on design aesthetics and selfie capabilities, appealing to users who value style and portability. However, the lack of Google services is a significant factor to consider.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Google Pixel 6 Pro.

Why? While the Huawei nova 11 boasts an attractive design and a compelling selfie camera, the potential limitations posed by the absence of Google services are a significant deterrent. My focus on user-centered design and holistic user experience leads me to prioritize the Pixel 6 Pro's seamless software integration, powerful performance, and robust accessibility features. The Pixel 6 Pro offers a more complete and reliable user experience that aligns with my principles of intuitive and inclusive technology. The consistent updates and integration with the Google ecosystem ensure a longer lifespan and a more future-proof device.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.