Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 14, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 111.96 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.03 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 224 g 189 g
Height 163.8 mm 171.4 mm
Width 76.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Eternal Black
  • Skyline Blue
  • Misty Gray
  • Desert Sand
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 88.2 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 388 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2500 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 119.65 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.12 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5500 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 750 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: A Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureAsus Zenfone 11 UltraMotorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm (folded)The Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more compact when folded, enhancing portability. The Zenfone 11 Ultra is thinner when unfolded.
Weight224g189gThe Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
FoldableNoYesThe Razr's foldable design offers unique portability and a smaller footprint when closed.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedMaterial choice impacts durability and premium feel; this information is missing.
Display
Size6.78"6.9"The Razr 50 Ultra offers a slightly larger main display.
TypeLTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDBoth use power-efficient LTPO panels. The Razr's foldable display introduces a crease but enables unique functionality.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2640The Razr has a slightly higher resolution and sharper image, but the difference is minimal at this size.
Refresh Rate144Hz165HzBoth offer incredibly smooth scrolling and animations. The Razr's slightly higher refresh rate might be noticeable in fast-paced games, but both are excellent.
Peak Brightness2500 nits3000 nitsThe Razr 50 Ultra offers superior outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3Snapdragon 8+ Gen 3The Zenfone uses a slightly newer and potentially more powerful chip, likely leading to better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)The Zenfone's CPU configuration suggests a potential performance advantage, particularly in single-core tasks.
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 735The Adreno 750 in the Zenfone should provide a better gaming experience and handle graphics-intensive tasks more smoothly.
RAM16GB12GBThe Zenfone offers more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding applications.
Storage512GB256GBThe Zenfone offers double the storage, allowing users to store more apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity5500 mAh4000 mAhThe Zenfone has significantly larger battery capacity, likely resulting in much longer battery life.
CameraSpecific camera sensor details (megapixels, aperture) are missing, hindering a detailed comparison. Video capabilities suggest both phones can record high-quality video, but sensor quality and image processing ultimately determine real-world performance.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Zenfone 11 Ultra Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with 16GB RAM, provides a significant performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Longer Battery Life: The massive 5500mAh battery should easily last a full day, even with heavy usage.
  • More Storage: 512GB offers ample space for apps, media, and files.

Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers unparalleled portability and a unique form factor.
  • Brighter Display: 3000 nits peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Zenfone 11 Ultra: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance, battery life, and ample storage.

Razr 50 Ultra: Suitable for users who value portability and a unique, compact design above all else. The foldable form factor is a key differentiator.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is portability your top priority? If so, the Razr 50 Ultra's foldable design is a compelling choice.
  2. Do you need the best possible performance and battery life? The Zenfone 11 Ultra excels in these areas.
  3. What is your budget? While both are in the "medium price" range, the specific price difference could be a deciding factor.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For a frequent traveler: The Razr 50 Ultra's compact size makes it ideal for travel.
  • For a mobile gamer: The Zenfone 11 Ultra's superior performance is essential for a smooth gaming experience.
  • For a heavy smartphone user: The Zenfone 11 Ultra's large battery and ample storage are crucial for all-day usage.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.