ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 vs Xiaomi Redmi A1+ - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 11, 2021 September 23, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 127.23 cm³ 115.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 220 g 192 g
Height 169.9 mm 164.9 mm
Width 77.2 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aurora
  • Eclipse Black
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 81 %
Pixel Density 387 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 630 nits 400 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.21 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.69 mAh/cm³ 43.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU Adreno 660 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, Accessory Connector microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Redmi A1+Practical Impact
Dimensions169.9 × 77.2 × 9.7 mm164.9 × 76.8 × 9.1 mmZTE is taller and thicker, may be less pocketable. Xiaomi is more compact and could be easier to handle.
Weight220g192gXiaomi is significantly lighter, more comfortable for long use.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones.

Display

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Redmi A1+Practical Impact
Size6.8"6.52"ZTE has a slightly larger display, potentially more immersive for media consumption, but less pocketable.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600ZTE has a much sharper display with finer detail. Xiaomi display will appear less crisp.
PPI387269ZTE display is noticeably sharper.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDZTE: Better colors, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency for dark themes. Xiaomi: More common LCD tech.
Refresh Rate165Hz60HzZTE offers much smoother scrolling and animations. Xiaomi's refresh rate is typical for basic phones.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness data is unavailable for both phones, making it impossible to comment on their display brightness.

Performance

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Redmi A1+Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Mediatek Helio A22 (12 nm)ZTE: Flagship-level performance, suitable for demanding games and applications. Xiaomi: Entry-level performance for basic tasks.
AnTuTu ScoreN/A95,000No direct comparison possible. However, given the chipsets, the ZTE phone will likely score significantly higher.
GPUAdreno 660PowerVR GE8320ZTE: Superior graphics processing for gaming and GPU-intensive apps. Xiaomi: Suitable for basic graphics.

Camera

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Redmi A1+Practical Impact
Standard CameraN/A8MP (f/2.0, 1.00 µm)Xiaomi has a standard camera. ZTE has no standard camera.
Selfie CameraN/A5MP (f/2.2, 1.12 µm)Xiaomi has a selfie camera. ZTE has no selfie camera.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@240fps; No stabilization1080p@30fps, No stabilizationZTE records much higher resolution and has better slow-motion capabilities. Xiaomi is limited to basic 1080p.
FeaturesDigital zoom, Dual camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timerXiaomi offers a good suite of features. ZTE lacks specific camera features.

Battery

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Redmi A1+Practical Impact
Capacity0mAh5000mAhXiaomi has a significantly larger battery; however, battery data is unavailable for the ZTE phone, so a comparison of battery life is impossible.
ChargingStandard charging10W fast charging, Li-IonXiaomi offers fast charging at 10W. ZTE's charging capabilities are unknown.

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Larger, higher resolution AMOLED display with a 165Hz refresh rate offers a much smoother and more vibrant visual experience, significantly better for gaming and media consumption.
  • Flagship Performance: Snapdragon 888 chipset provides high-end performance, allowing for demanding games and applications to run smoothly.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Can record in up to 8K resolution, offers significantly better video recording capabilities.

Xiaomi Redmi A1+ Advantages:

  • Significantly Lighter: Easier to handle for extended periods, and can be more pocketable.
  • Larger Battery: Larger 5000mAh battery combined with the less power-hungry chipset will likely offer extended battery life.
  • Basic Camera Features: Includes Standard and Selfie Cameras and basic camera functionality.
  • Fast Charging: Supports 10W fast charging.
  • Better Connectivity: Newer Bluetooth and WiFi standards, better GPS support and dual-sim capabilities.

Trade-offs:

  • ZTE: Compromises are made in battery, camera features, weight, and dimensions.
  • Xiaomi: Compromises are made in performance, display quality, and video recording capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6:

  • Ideal User: Hardcore mobile gamers, media enthusiasts who prioritize top-tier performance and display quality.
  • Use Cases: High-end gaming, watching videos and movies, using graphically demanding apps.
  • Price-to-Value: High, targeted at power users who are willing to pay a premium for performance.

Xiaomi Redmi A1+:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious individuals, first-time smartphone users, or those needing a reliable secondary device for basic tasks.
  • Use Cases: Web browsing, social media, casual gaming, day-to-day use, media consumption.
  • Price-to-Value: Excellent, prioritizes essential functions at an accessible price point.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is my primary use case? (Gaming, photography, everyday use)
  2. How important is display quality and smooth performance? (High, Medium, Low)
  3. What is my budget? (High, Medium, Low)

Scenario Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Gaming/Multimedia): If your primary use case is demanding mobile gaming, and you value a smooth and visually impressive experience, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 is the better choice, despite the compromises.
  • Scenario 2 (Budget-Conscious Everyday Use): If you prioritize a long battery life, basic camera functionality, and everyday tasks such as social media and web browsing, the Xiaomi Redmi A1+ is a practical and cost-effective option.
  • Scenario 3 (Balanced Usage): If you need a smartphone that does everything "well enough" without any single area being a priority, neither phone offers a great choice. It would be necessary to look at alternative phones.

My Choice

Given the information available, and considering I would want a phone that could handle most tasks, I would choose the Xiaomi Redmi A1+. The ZTE offers a vastly superior display and performance, but as some of the most critical details are missing, such as battery capacity, camera specs, and weight, it's not a safe choice for me. Also, I'd want a phone with a rear camera and a selfie camera, both of which are not present in the ZTE. The Xiaomi, whilst lacking in performance, offers a good battery, rear and selfie cameras, more connectivity, and the essential day to day functionality, and importantly, more detailed specification information.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.