ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 vs Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 11, 2021 March 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 127.23 cm³ 95.71 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 220 g 179.5 g
Height 169.9 mm 159.9 mm
Width 77.2 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aurora
  • Eclipse Black
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.5 %
Pixel Density 387 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 630 nits 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.21 mAh/in² 120.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.69 mAh/cm³ 52.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, Accessory Connector USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Poco M4 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions169.9 × 77.2 × 9.7 mm159.9 × 73.9 × 8.1 mmRed Magic is significantly larger and thicker, less pocketable. Poco M4 Pro is slimmer and more comfortable.
Weight220g179.5gRed Magic feels heavier in hand; Poco M4 Pro is lighter for extended use.
Display
Size6.8"6.43"Red Magic offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer similar clarity, good for general use.
PPI387409Poco M4 Pro has slightly sharper text and images but is not very noticeable in day to day use.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good contrast.
Refresh Rate165Hz90HzRed Magic is vastly smoother with its 165Hz, making animations and gaming much more fluid.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have the same peak brightness, but the lack of numerical value for brightness is concerning. Need to be checked.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Helio G96 (12 nm)Red Magic has a significantly more powerful chipset for demanding tasks, gaming and faster overall speed.
AnTuTu ScoreN/A438,700Poco M4 Pro benchmark available while no benchmarks available for Red Magic 6.
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G57 MC2Red Magic's GPU is significantly more powerful, resulting in much better graphics rendering for gaming.
Battery
Capacity0 mAh5000 mAhPoco M4 Pro has a much larger battery, offering significantly better battery life, based on stated mAh. The Red Magic's is unknown, which is a crucial piece of information that is missing.
ChargingStandard charging33W fast charging, Li-Ion PolymerPoco M4 Pro can charge significantly faster, which is more convenient.
FeaturesStandard featuresNon-removablePoco M4 Pro's battery is not removable.
Camera
Standard CameraN/A50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µmPoco M4 Pro has a dedicated standard camera for detailed photos.
Selfie CameraN/A16MP, f/2.45, 1/3.06", 1.00µmPoco M4 Pro offers dedicated selfie camera for clear, high-resolution photos.
Wide Angle LensN/A8MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 1.14µmPoco M4 Pro offers a wide-angle camera for capturing expansive scenes.
Video Recording8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@240fps1080p@30fps, Slow-motion: Yes, 60fpsRed Magic records at significantly higher quality but without stabilization, whereas Poco offers lower resolution with stabilization and slow-motion.
FeaturesDigital zoom, Dual camera, Digital image stabilization, Ultra stable video, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Night ModePoco M4 Pro offers additional camera features like image stabilization, digital zoom, multiple modes, and more, suitable for versatile photography.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 11Both use the same base OS, so software experience will mostly depend on customizations and updates.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Hotspot, Direct, DisplayPoco M4 Pro offers newer WiFi standards for faster and more reliable connectivity, includes additional features like dual-band and hotspot.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1, A2DP, LE, APT-x, LDAC, AACPoco M4 Pro uses a more recent Bluetooth version, with advanced audio codec support.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoPoco M4 Pro uses more advanced GPS for better location accuracy.
SIMDual SIM, Dual StandbyPoco M4 Pro allows the use of two SIM cards simultaneously.
Storage
InternalBoth phones have the same maximum storage capacity of 0GB.
RAMInsufficient for basic usage
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage via SD card.
Audio
QualityBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesPoco M4 Pro has superior audio capabilities with immersive Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res support, and better recording with its dual microphones.
Security
Featuresbasic fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorPoco M4 Pro's side-mounted sensor is usually more convenient than basic sensors.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 3Poco M4 Pro has better protection against scratches and drops.
SensorsBasic sensorsFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtual, Light sensorPoco M4 Pro has a more complete set of sensors, allowing for a broader range of applications and features.

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 Advantages:

  • Superior Display Smoothness: The 165Hz refresh rate offers an unmatched level of smoothness for gaming and general use, making animations and transitions feel incredibly fluid.
  • Higher Performance Chipset: The Snapdragon 888 provides significantly higher processing power and better graphics performance, which is ideal for gamers and users with demanding applications.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: The Red Magic 6 can capture up to 8k videos, making it better suited for those looking to produce high-quality video content.

Practical Implications: Red Magic 6 is designed for performance, particularly gaming, with a focus on smoothness and high frame rates. It will run resource-heavy applications and graphically intensive games more smoothly.

Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: The significantly reduced weight and smaller size make it more comfortable for everyday use and portability.
  • Superior Battery Life: The 5000mAh battery, offers a significantly longer battery life than the unknown battery capacity of the Red Magic, allowing users to go a full day, or more, without worrying about charging.
  • Fast Charging: 33W fast charging allows for significantly faster charging times, more convenient for most users.
  • Better Camera System: The inclusion of multiple cameras, stabilization, and various shooting modes makes the Poco M4 Pro more versatile in different shooting scenarios.
  • More Advanced Features: Features like Dual SIM, better WiFi, Bluetooth and GPS, along with stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos provide a more well-rounded user experience.
  • Better Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass 3 helps avoid scratches and some breakage.

Practical Implications: The Poco M4 Pro is an all-around device focused on providing a balance of features for daily use, battery longevity, and versatile photography capabilities.

Significant Trade-Offs:

  • The Red Magic 6's advantage in performance comes at the cost of battery life, size, and weight, whereas the Poco M4 Pro prioritizes practical everyday use.
  • The Red Magic 6's high-resolution video is great but it lacks stabilization, while the Poco M4 Pro delivers stable footage but at lower resolutions.
  • The lack of battery capacity, camera and other specs in the Red Magic 6 is concerning.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for ZTE nubia Red Magic 6:

  • Hardcore Gamers: Users who prioritize extremely smooth gaming performance and frame rates.
  • High-Performance Users: Users who frequently run demanding apps or multitask heavily.
  • Users who prioritize video recording quality.

Use Cases:

  • Playing graphics-intensive mobile games at high settings.
  • Video editing and rendering on the go.
  • Running multiple applications simultaneously without slowdown.

Ideal User for Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro:

  • Everyday Users: Those looking for a reliable phone for daily tasks, social media, and media consumption.
  • Value Seekers: Users who want a balance of features without spending on top-end specs.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those who like to take photos regularly with ease and versatility.
  • Users who prioritize battery life and usability.

Use Cases:

  • Browsing the web, using social media, and watching videos.
  • Capturing photos and videos in different scenarios.
  • Having a phone that can last throughout the day without needing frequent charging.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Poco M4 Pro generally provides a better price-to-value ratio for the average user, offering a good balance of features and performance without the high-end cost. The Red Magic 6 aims at a niche performance-focused market, likely at a higher price point.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary use case? (Gaming, general use, photography, media consumption)
  2. How important is smooth performance vs. battery life?
  3. What's your budget, and are you willing to pay more for high-end performance features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Gamers: If you are a serious gamer and prioritize the smoothest possible gaming experience, the Red Magic 6 is the better option, assuming you can live with the shorter battery life and bulkier form factor.

  • Scenario 2: Casual User: If you are looking for a reliable all-around device for everyday use with good battery life and capable photography, the Poco M4 Pro is the more practical choice.

  • Scenario 3: Photographer: If you prioritize camera features and versatility, the Poco M4 Pro is better equipped with its multiple lenses and modes.

My Choice and Why

Based on the available information, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro. Here's why:

  • Practicality: The Poco M4 Pro is simply a more practical device for day-to-day use. Its lighter weight, more compact design, longer battery life, and faster charging make it much more convenient to use daily.
  • Well-Rounded Features: While not as powerful as the Red Magic 6 on paper, the Poco M4 Pro offers a very competent chipset for normal use, along with a solid camera system, good audio and connectivity features, all things that a typical user will benefit from.
  • Missing Information on Red Magic 6: The absence of critical information for the Red Magic 6 (battery capacity, camera specs etc.) is concerning. It is not possible to accurately evaluate the device without such info. In contrast, Poco provides a more complete picture of its capabilities.
  • Value: The Poco M4 Pro likely offers better value for most users. It balances key features well without the higher price tag associated with high-end gaming devices.

While the Red Magic 6 has an edge in raw performance and display smoothness, the Poco M4 Pro is the more sensible choice for most users due to its versatility, battery life, and practicality. Unless you are a hardcore gamer who needs the absolute highest performance, the Poco M4 Pro offers a better balance of features, making it the more sensible choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.