ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 vs Xiaomi Poco F3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 11, 2021 March 27, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 127.23 cm³ 97.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 220 g 196 g
Height 169.9 mm 163.7 mm
Width 77.2 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aurora
  • Eclipse Black
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 85.9 %
Pixel Density 387 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 630 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.21 mAh/in² 101.60 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.69 mAh/cm³ 46.33 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 4520 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, Accessory Connector USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Dimensions169.9 x 77.2 x 9.7 mm163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mmThe Red Magic 6 is taller and significantly thicker, making the Poco F3 more pocketable and comfortable to hold.
Weight220g196gThe Poco F3 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during prolonged use.

Display

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Size6.8"6.67"The Red Magic 6 has a marginally larger screen, offering a slightly more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Both offer the same level of sharpness, with no noticeable difference in clarity.
Pixel Density (PPI)387395Both offer similar pixel density. Not a noticeable difference in clarity.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks characteristic of AMOLED displays.
Refresh Rate165Hz120HzThe Red Magic 6 offers smoother scrolling and animations, particularly noticeable in fast-paced games and UI navigation.
Brightness0 nits1300 nitsThe Poco F3 has much higher peak brightness, offering significantly better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight. The value for the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6 is likely incorrect or missing, as 0 nits would imply no display.

Performance

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)The Snapdragon 888 in the Red Magic 6 is theoretically more powerful, but the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F3 is still a high-end chip providing smooth performance for demanding tasks.
AnTuTu ScoreN/A800,216The Poco F3's benchmark score shows a robust performance, but comparable scores for the Red Magic 6 are not available.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 650The Adreno 660 in the Red Magic 6 should offer slightly better graphics performance, but both are very capable GPUs.

Camera

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Standard CameraN/A48MP (f/1.79, 1/2", Sony IMX582)The Poco F3 has a standard camera, while the Red Magic 6's main camera specs are not provided. This makes it impossible to compare.
Selfie CameraN/A20MP (f/2.45, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3T2)The Poco F3 includes a selfie camera. The specs for Red Magic 6's selfie camera are not provided. This makes it impossible to compare.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fps, no stabilizationUp to 4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@960fps (slow motion)The Red Magic 6 can record 8K video but lacks stabilization, which might be less practical. The Poco F3's video features include stabilization and slow motion.
FeaturesBasic Features4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timerThe Poco F3 has a more complete suite of features, making it a more versatile camera phone.

Battery

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Capacity0 mAh4520 mAhThe Poco F3 has a significantly larger battery, which will generally result in much longer battery life. The value for the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 6 is likely incorrect or missing, as 0 mAh is impossible.
ChargingStandard Charging33W Fast ChargingThe Poco F3 supports fast charging, enabling quicker replenishment of battery power.
FeaturesStandard FeaturesNon-removable, QC3+/PD3.0 Fast Charging SupportThe Poco F3 has non-removable batteries and faster charging using various standards.

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate: 165Hz display offers extremely smooth scrolling and gaming.
  • Potentially More Powerful Chipset: The Snapdragon 888 might offer slightly better performance in demanding tasks, but this is not certain.
  • 8K Video Recording: Offers a higher video resolution (8K) for more detail in videos, although its practicality is questionable without video stabilization

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Thinner Design: More comfortable to hold and carry.
  • Significantly Better Display Brightness: Much better outdoor visibility.
  • Better Camera System: Includes main, selfie, and feature-rich video capabilities, with video stabilization.
  • Fast Charging: Supports 33W fast charging for quicker battery replenishment.
  • Better Battery Capacity: Much larger battery for longer use on a single charge.
  • More Complete Features: Supports more WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS, and SIM configurations
  • Superior Audio: Provides better audio quality using Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res, and Stereo Speakers
  • Better Protection: Offers Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection, which the ZTE Nubia does not specify
  • Comprehensive Sensors: Includes a complete suite of biometric, motion and proximity sensors.

Trade-offs:

  • The Red Magic 6 is built for gaming. It offers higher refresh rate, but it does not specify its other specs, including its camera specs.
  • The Poco F3's more balanced feature set comes at the expense of a slightly lower refresh rate but provides better practical features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 Ideal User:

  • Hardcore Mobile Gamers: Those who prioritize extremely high refresh rates for competitive gaming, though its practicality is reduced by the absence of any details regarding its camera or video specifications.
  • Users Seeking Raw Performance: Those who value the absolute most powerful chipset.

Use Cases:

  • Competitive mobile gaming requiring the highest possible refresh rate.
  • Users who want to record 8k video but do not need video stabilization.

Xiaomi Poco F3 Ideal User:

  • General Smartphone Users: Those who value a balanced feature set, with good performance, camera, battery life, and display quality.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Those who watch a lot of video and listen to audio using their phones.
  • Value-Conscious Buyers: Those looking for a high-performing phone without paying a premium price.

Use Cases:

  • Daily usage, including browsing, social media, and communication.
  • Photography and videography with a versatile camera system.
  • Watching videos and listening to music with enhanced audio output.
  • Moderate gaming with a focus on good overall performance.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Poco F3 offers a strong price-to-value ratio, delivering excellent features at a competitive price. The Red Magic 6 is difficult to evaluate due to missing information about its camera, battery, display brightness, and screen protection.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is gaming to you? The Red Magic 6 is tailored for high-refresh-rate gaming, while the Poco F3 is better all-round.
  2. Do you need a versatile camera system? The Poco F3 has a better camera system with stabilization, while it is unknown what the Red Magic 6 offers.
  3. Is longer battery life or fast charging more important for you? The Poco F3 has a larger battery and faster charging. The Red Magic 6 has no value available for its battery.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Competitive Gaming: If your main priority is competitive mobile gaming and you value a high refresh rate above everything else, the Red Magic 6 might be suitable. However, its practicality is limited by the missing specs.
  • Scenario 2: All-Around User: If you want a balanced smartphone with good performance, camera, battery life, and display brightness, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is the better choice.
  • Scenario 3: Outdoor Usage: If you frequently use your phone in bright sunlight, the Poco F3’s higher brightness display will be much more practical.

What I would choose and why!

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F3. Here's why:

  • Practicality and Completeness: The Poco F3 has a significantly more complete and practical feature set. It has a functional camera system, unlike the Red Magic 6 where details regarding the camera are missing.
  • Better User Experience: The brighter display, lighter design, and significantly longer battery life of the Poco F3 will lead to a much better day-to-day experience.
  • Value: Given the comprehensive feature set, the Poco F3 offers a very compelling price-to-value ratio compared to the Red Magic 6.

While the Red Magic 6 might have a theoretically more powerful chipset and higher refresh rate, the Poco F3’s more practical features like superior display brightness, camera capabilities, longer battery life, faster charging, and superior sensor suite make it the clear winner for me as an all-around smartphone. The lack of crucial specifications for the Red Magic 6 makes it impossible to recommend.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.