ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 11, 2021 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 127.23 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 220 g 192 g
Height 169.9 mm 168 mm
Width 77.2 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aurora
  • Eclipse Black
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 387 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 630 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.21 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.69 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, Accessory Connector USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions169.9 × 77.2 × 9.7 mm168 × 78 × 8.1 mmRed Magic 6 is slightly taller and thicker, feeling bulkier and less pocketable; Poco C65 is slimmer and easier to handle.
Weight220g192gPoco C65 is significantly lighter, leading to more comfortable long-term use.
Display
Size6.8"6.74"Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Red Magic 6 offers sharper visuals, text, and images; Poco C65's display will appear less detailed.
Pixel Density (PPI)387260Red Magic 6 has a significantly sharper display than the Poco C65.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDRed Magic 6 has superior blacks, contrast and vibrant colours and more efficient for dark themes and better viewing angles; Poco C65 has an LCD, which is typically less vibrant.
Refresh Rate165Hz90HzRed Magic 6 provides much smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming; Poco C65 is less fluid.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsIdentical peak brightness (Note: Actual max brightness is unknown, 0 nits is unexpected)
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)Red Magic 6 offers significantly higher processing power and faster performance, especially in demanding tasks; Poco C65 is more basic.
AnTuTu ScoreN/A237,768Red Magic 6 benchmark score unavailable; Poco C65 has a moderate score suitable for light to medium tasks.
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G52 MC2 (Arm Mali-G52 MC2)Red Magic 6 has a much more powerful GPU, excelling in gaming and graphics-intensive applications; Poco C65 is weaker for gaming.
Battery
Capacity0 mAh5000 mAhPoco C65 should offer considerably longer battery life; Red Magic 6 battery capacity is unknown.
ChargingStandard charging18W fast chargingPoco C65 can recharge faster; Red Magic 6 charging speed unknown.
FeaturesStandard featuresReverse charging, Non-removablePoco C65 can be used to charge other devices; Red Magic 6 has standard charging features.
Camera
Standard CameraN/A50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µmPoco C65 offers a standard camera, Red Magic 6 doesn't.
Selfie CameraN/A8MP, f/2.2Poco C65 has a front-facing camera for selfies and video calls, Red Magic 6 does not.
Portrait CameraN/A2MP, f/2.4Poco C65 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, Red Magic 6 does not.
Macro LensN/A2MP, f/2.4Poco C65 has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots, Red Magic 6 does not.
Video Recording8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, No stabilization1080p@30fps, Yes slow-motion, no stabilizationRed Magic 6 records higher resolution videos but lacks stabilization; Poco C65 has basic video with slow-mo and basic stabilization.
Features4K Video, Digital zoom, Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAWPoco C65 has more camera features.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 13Poco C65 has a newer Android OS version with the latest features and security updates; Red Magic 6 runs on an older version.
Connectivity
WiFiUnknown802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band, Hotspot, Direct, DisplayPoco C65 supports newer WiFi standards and more features; Red Magic 6 WiFi specs unknown.
BluetoothUnknown5.3, A2DP, LE, APT-xPoco C65 has newer Bluetooth and supports better audio codecs; Red Magic 6 Bluetooth specs unknown.
GPSUnknownGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoPoco C65 has more accurate GPS due to more satellite support; Red Magic 6 GPS unknown.
SIMUnknownDual SIM Dual StandbyPoco C65 supports two SIM cards simultaneously; Red Magic 6 SIM info unknown.
Storage
Internal StorageUnknown128GB or 256GBPoco C65 offers options for onboard storage while the storage options for the Red Magic 6 are unknown.
RAMUnknown4GB/6GB/8GBPoco C65 offers higher RAM options while the RAM option for the Red Magic 6 is unknown.
Expandable StorageNoNoBoth devices do not offer expandable storage.
Audio
QualityBasicBasicBoth phones offer basic audio output capabilities.
Security
FeaturesBasic fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorPoco C65 has a more accessible and modern fingerprint sensor; Red Magic 6 has basic.
Build
ProtectionUnknownUnknownBoth phones lack information on the type of screen protection.
Sensors
SensorsBasic sensorsFingerprint, Light sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtualPoco C65 features a more comprehensive set of sensors for enhanced functionality and gaming; Red Magic 6 has only basic sensors.

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Display: AMOLED panel with a 165Hz refresh rate, higher resolution, and pixel density results in a much smoother, more vibrant, and sharper visual experience, ideal for gaming and media consumption.
  • Far Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 888 is a high-end chipset, offering flagship-level performance and a significant advantage in demanding tasks, including gaming, video editing and other heavy-duty use cases.
  • Superior Video Recording: The ability to record up to 8K resolution video provides professional capabilities, albeit without image stabilization.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Much Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery paired with an efficient chipset results in potentially much longer battery life.
  • Fast Charging: 18W fast charging support allows for much quicker refills of the battery compared to the Red Magic 6 which lacks that specification.
  • Triple Camera System: Includes a dedicated primary, portrait, and macro lens, along with features like digital image stabilization, HDR, and more.
  • More Connectivity Options: Includes newer WiFi and Bluetooth standards, with additional location and SIM features.
  • Newer Software: Runs Android 13 compared to the older Android 11 of the Red Magic 6.
  • Reverse Charging: The ability to charge other devices through its battery can be a useful feature.
  • Lighter and Slimmer Build: Easier to handle and more pocketable.
  • More Available Storage and RAM Options: You can choose options with 128 or 256 GB of storage and 4/6/8 GB of ram, while those specifications are unknown for the ZTE nubia Red Magic 6.

Trade-offs:

  • Red Magic 6 users trade battery life and camera features for a superior display and performance.
  • Poco C65 users get excellent battery life and camera versitility, at the cost of a less impressive display and performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6:

  • Ideal User: Hardcore gamers and power users who prioritize performance and visual fidelity above all else.
  • Use Cases: High-end mobile gaming, video editing, running demanding applications, enjoying high-resolution media.
  • Price-to-Value: Likely to offer better value for gamers and performance-oriented users, if priced competitively. However, the lack of camera features, battery life information, and connectivity could be detrimental.

Xiaomi Poco C65:

  • Ideal User: Everyday users who prioritize battery life, camera versatility, and value for money.
  • Use Cases: Social media, photography, casual gaming, web browsing, and day-to-day tasks.
  • Price-to-Value: A good choice for budget-conscious consumers who value practicality and a well-rounded feature set.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is gaming and performance for you? (Red Magic 6 excels, Poco C65 is less powerful).
  2. Do you value a vibrant and smooth display, even if it means less battery life and camera versatility? (Red Magic 6 has a superior display).
  3. How important is battery life and a good camera for your daily use? (Poco C65 has a larger battery and more camera features).

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Mobile Gamer: Choose the Red Magic 6 due to its superior display and processor for smooth gameplay.
  • Scenario 2: Casual User: Choose the Poco C65 for its better battery life, more versatile camera and practical features.
  • Scenario 3: Media Consumption: The Red Magic 6 with its AMOLED display is a better fit if you prioritize visual quality. If you prioritize battery life over display quality, the Poco C65 is a better choice.
  • Scenario 4: Photography: The Poco C65 is better with its versatile triple camera system.

My Choice and Why

Based on the information provided, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco C65.

Here's why:

  • Practicality: For my typical use case as a smartphone analyst, I need a reliable device with a long battery life, and a decent camera for everyday use, which the Poco C65 provides.
  • All-Rounder: The Poco C65 offers a balanced feature set: a large battery, good camera system, newer software, and modern connectivity features at a budget price. It handles the daily tasks I need from a smartphone, such as browsing, email, social media, and photography, very well. The Red Magic 6 is built more for gaming, and sacrifices many other daily useful features to achieve this.
  • More Information: With the Poco C65, I have most of the information available to me, whereas key specifications like the battery size, charging details, display brightness and camera details are not available for the Red Magic 6, which makes it a less compelling choice as I don't have all the facts available.

While the Red Magic 6 offers a superior display and processing power for gaming, the trade-offs in battery life, and other practical features are not worth it for my personal use. The Poco C65 is the more sensible choice for everyday smartphone use, balancing key specifications with a focus on battery life, camera features and ease of use. The Red Magic 6 excels in performance, but the lack of information available on other specs makes it harder to recommend.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.