ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 11, 2021 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 127.23 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g N/A
Weight 220 g 0 g
Height 169.9 mm 163.7 mm
Width 77.2 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aurora
  • Eclipse Black
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 387 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 630 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.21 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.69 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 660 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 N/A
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, Accessory Connector USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 vs. Tecno Spark Go 2024

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Tecno Spark Go 2024Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions169.9 × 77.2 × 9.7 mm163.7 × 75.6 × 8.6 mmRed Magic 6 is larger and thicker, making it less pocketable. Spark Go 2024 is more compact.
Weight220g0gThe Red Magic 6 is significantly heavier, potentially causing fatigue during long usage. The Spark Go 2024 weight is missing making direct weight comparison not possible
Display
Size6.8"6.6"Red Magic 6 offers slightly more screen real estate for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Red Magic 6 has a sharper, more detailed display, better for reading text and watching high-resolution videos.
Pixel Density (PPI)387267Red Magic 6's display appears significantly sharper than the Spark Go 2024.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDRed Magic 6 has superior contrast, color vibrancy, and deeper blacks, making content look more vivid and immersive. Also, offers superior power efficiency for dark themes
Refresh Rate165Hz90HzRed Magic 6 delivers much smoother scrolling, gaming, and animations, resulting in a more responsive feel.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness data is missing for both models, so comparison is not possible
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Red Magic 6 offers significantly faster performance, handling demanding apps and games smoothly. Spark Go 2024 is suitable for basic tasks.
AnTuTu ScoreN/A249,000AnTuTu score is missing for Red Magic 6 making direct comparison impossible, but based on its chipset, it is likely to be higher
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G57 MP1Red Magic 6's GPU is significantly more powerful, resulting in superior gaming performance and smoother graphics rendering.
Camera
Main CameraNot Specified13MP, f/1.9Spark Go 2024 has a primary camera, while the Red Magic 6 camera specifications are missing from provided information
Selfie CameraNot Specified8MP, f/2.2Spark Go 2024 has a selfie camera, while the Red Magic 6 camera specifications are missing from provided information.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fps1080p@30fpsRed Magic 6 offers far superior video recording capabilities with higher resolutions and frame rates. Spark Go 2024 is limited to 1080p.
Video StabilizationNoYesSpark Go 2024 has video stabilization, leading to less shaky recordings. Red Magic 6 recordings may appear shaky.
Additional FeaturesNot SpecifiedDigital zoom, Dual camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, PDAF, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance, ISO, Exposure, Scene, Self-timer, Front FlashSpark Go 2024 has a wide range of camera features, while Red Magic 6 specifications are missing from the provided data
Battery
Capacity0 mAh5000 mAhThe battery capacity for Red Magic 6 is not specified. Spark Go 2024 offers a large 5000 mAh battery for extended usage.
ChargingStandard Charging10W Fast ChargingSpark Go 2024 supports fast charging, while the Red Magic 6 has standard charging which may be slower.
FeaturesStandard featuresNon-removableSpark Go 2024 offers a non-removable battery.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 13Spark Go 2024 has a newer version of Android.
Connectivity
Wi-FiNot Specified802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band, Hotspot, Direct, DisplaySpark Go 2024 supports a wider range of Wi-Fi standards and features for better connectivity. Red Magic 6 specifications are missing from the provided data
BluetoothNot Specified5.0 LE, A2DPSpark Go 2024 has a more modern Bluetooth version and related features. Red Magic 6 specifications are missing from the provided data
GPSNot SpecifiedGPS, A-GPSSpark Go 2024 has more features for better location accuracy. Red Magic 6 specifications are missing from the provided data
SIMNot SpecifiedDual SIM, Dual StandbySpark Go 2024 supports Dual SIM functionality, while the Red Magic 6 specifications are missing from the provided data
Storage
Internal StorageNot Specified64GB or 128GBSpark Go 2024 has 64 GB or 128 GB of storage. Red Magic 6 storage specifications are missing from the provided data
RAMNot Specified3GB or 4GBSpark Go 2024 has 3 GB or 4GB of RAM, suitable for basic multitasking. Red Magic 6 RAM specifications are missing from the provided data
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage via microSD.
Audio
QualityBasic audio featuresDTS/DTS X, Stereo SpeakersSpark Go 2024 provides better audio quality with DTS and stereo speakers, for better audio experience. Red Magic 6 specifications are missing from the provided data
Security
FeaturesBasic Fingerprint SensorSide-mounted Fingerprint SensorSpark Go 2024 offers a more convenient and modern side-mounted fingerprint sensor. Red Magic 6 specifications are missing from the provided data
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownUnknownScreen protection specifications are missing for both models
Sensors
SensorsBasic sensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Light, Accelerometer, Compass, GravitySpark Go 2024 offers a good range of sensors. Red Magic 6 specifications are missing from the provided data

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, and a 165Hz refresh rate offer an outstanding visual experience for gaming and media.
  • High-End Performance: The Snapdragon 888 5G chipset delivers flagship-level performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Supports up to 8K video recording, making it suitable for professional video creation.

Practical Implications: Red Magic 6 excels in gaming, content consumption, and professional video recording due to its display quality and performance.

Tecno Spark Go 2024 Advantages:

  • Lower Weight: Significantly lighter (though weight of Red Magic 6 is not available) potentially enhancing user comfort.
  • More Modern OS: Comes with a newer version of Android.
  • Fast Charging: Supports 10W fast charging, a convenience for users who need a quick recharge.
  • Better Camera Features: Includes a dedicated main and selfie camera with several features, unlike Red Magic 6 camera specs which are not available
  • Dual Sim: Offers Dual SIM capabilities.
  • More Connectivity Features: Supports more WiFi, Bluetooth, and GPS features.
  • Better Audio Features: Comes with DTS / DTS X and Stereo Speakers.
  • More Sensors: Comes with Fingerprint, Proximity, Light, Accelerometer, Compass, and Gravity sensors.

Practical Implications: Spark Go 2024 is more suitable for everyday usage, offering a decent camera, modern OS, and quick charging at an entry-level price point.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Red Magic 6: Lacks features such as a dedicated main/selfie camera, fast charging, Dual SIM, and modern OS. The provided specifications are missing for many core features of this phone.
  • Spark Go 2024: Offers significantly lower performance, display quality, and video recording capabilities compared to Red Magic 6.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal Users for ZTE nubia Red Magic 6:

  • Hardcore Gamers: The high refresh rate display, powerful chipset, and fast video capabilities make it a perfect fit for gamers.
  • Mobile Content Creators: The 8K video recording feature caters to those needing professional-grade video quality.
  • Users Prioritizing Visual Experience: Its high resolution and AMOLED display make it ideal for those who consume a lot of video content.

Ideal Users for Tecno Spark Go 2024:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those looking for an affordable, functional smartphone with everyday capabilities.
  • Basic Smartphone Users: Those who need a phone for calls, texting, social media, and light browsing.
  • Users Preferring Practicality: Those looking for a phone with good battery life, quick charging, and a dual-SIM option.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Red Magic 6: Excels in high-end gaming (e.g., Genshin Impact, Call of Duty Mobile), video editing, and watching HDR content.
  • Spark Go 2024: Suitable for everyday tasks (e.g., social media, browsing, messaging), casual photography, and media playback.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Considering the missing specifications for Red Magic 6, a price comparison isn't possible.
  • Spark Go 2024: Offers good value for its price for basic users but is not suited for high-performance tasks.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your primary use case? (Gaming, daily tasks, content creation etc.)
  2. How important is display quality? (Sharpness, color accuracy, refresh rate)
  3. What is your budget? (Entry-level vs. premium options)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High-Performance Gaming: If you are a gamer or need a powerful phone, and do not mind missing features, then Red Magic 6 is the better choice, though many specifications are missing.
  • Scenario 2: Basic, Affordable Smartphone: If you need a basic, functional phone with better battery life and fast charging, then Tecno Spark Go 2024 is the better option, given its complete list of specifications.
  • Scenario 3: Content Creation: If you are a content creator, Red Magic 6 provides 8k video support which would be important, though this recommendation would depend on what other features you prioritize, since most are missing from the provided spec sheet.

My Choice

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would choose the Tecno Spark Go 2024.

Here's why:

  • Complete Specification Set: The provided specifications for the Spark Go 2024 is complete allowing for a full assessment of the device, compared to the Red Magic 6 which is missing most of the specifications.
  • Practicality & Reliability: While the Red Magic 6 appears superior in gaming and media performance based on available information, it lacks details on daily use features such as a dedicated camera, SIM support, battery life, fast charging, and a more modern OS. The Tecno Spark Go 2024 provides a more complete package for everyday needs with fast charging, a dedicated camera, Dual SIM support, and other features, ensuring its reliability.
  • Price-to-Value: Given that the Spark Go 2024 is likely the more affordable option, its value proposition is stronger for users who are looking for a basic phone with a good battery.

In summary, while the Red Magic 6 has some appealing high-end specs, the lack of information about critical features means its difficult to ascertain its value, whereas the Tecno Spark Go 2024 presents itself as a reliable, budget-friendly device with a complete set of specifications, making it the more sensible choice for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.