ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 vs Samsung Galaxy A04e - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 11, 2021 November 7, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 127.23 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.09 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 220 g 188 g
Height 169.9 mm 164.2 mm
Width 77.2 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.7 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Aurora
  • Eclipse Black
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 387 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 630 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.21 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.69 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5050 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 660 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 3.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, Accessory Connector USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 vs. Samsung Galaxy A04e

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureZTE nubia Red Magic 6Samsung Galaxy A04ePractical Impact
Design
Dimensions169.9 × 77.2 × 9.7 mm164.2 × 75.9 × 9.1 mmRed Magic 6 is larger and bulkier, potentially less comfortable for smaller hands or pockets. A04e is more compact and pocketable.
Weight220g188gA04e is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. Red Magic 6 is heavier, might feel more substantial but could cause fatigue.
Display
Size6.8"6.5"Red Magic 6 offers a slightly larger viewing area, beneficial for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Red Magic 6 provides a much sharper image with more detail. A04e's display will appear less crisp, especially noticeable when reading text or viewing high-resolution images.
Pixel Density387 ppi270 ppiRed Magic 6's display will have significantly clearer images with better text readability. A04e will appear less detailed, affecting overall visual experience.
TechnologyAMOLEDPLS LCDRed Magic 6 has a superior display with deeper blacks, higher contrast, and potentially more vibrant colors. A04e will have a more traditional LCD look.
Refresh Rate165Hz60HzRed Magic 6 provides exceptionally smooth scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience, especially for gaming. A04e will have standard refresh rate with visible blur in fast motion.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness at 0 nits, but brightness is a missing spec
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm)Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm)Red Magic 6 offers significantly higher performance, capable of handling demanding games and applications smoothly. A04e is designed for basic tasks and will struggle with heavy usage.
Antutu ScoreN/A121,345Benchmark data is missing for Red Magic 6, making performance comparison difficult in terms of numbers.
GPUAdreno 660PowerVR GE8320Red Magic 6’s Adreno 660 will handle intensive graphics and gaming much better than the A04e's PowerVR GE8320.
Camera
Main CameraNone13MP, f/2.2A04e has a main camera; Red Magic 6 lacks one. A04e is capable of basic photography tasks; Red Magic 6 is designed for other aspects of phone functionality.
Selfie CameraNone5MP, f/2.2A04e has a front camera; Red Magic 6 lacks one. A04e can take selfies and make video calls; Red Magic 6 is not designed for taking pictures of the user.
Depth SensorNone2MP, f/2.4A04e has a depth sensor that provides portrait effects; Red Magic 6 does not offer any features like portrait mode.
VideoUp to 8K@30fps1080p@30fpsRed Magic 6 offers significantly higher video recording capabilities, making it suitable for professional use. A04e's capabilities are more limited to basic social media videos.
StabilizationNo StabilizationNo StabilizationBoth phones have no optical or digital image stabilization for video; likely to result in shaky footage.
Camera FeaturesN/ADigital zoom, Dual camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, Scene mode, Self-timerA04e offers more basic camera features to improve user experience and image quality.
Battery
Capacity0mAh5000mAhA04e is equipped with a large 5000mAh battery. Battery capacity is missing for the Red Magic 6, making a proper battery life comparison impossible.
ChargingStandard ChargingStandard ChargingBoth phones come with standard charging features; no advanced charging technology is indicated.
Battery FeaturesStandard featuresNon-removableA04e's battery is non-removable. A04e is unlikely to have a swappable battery.

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology with a 165Hz refresh rate and a much higher resolution offers a dramatically better viewing experience than the A04e's LCD with 60Hz.
  • High Performance Chipset: Snapdragon 888 allows for significantly smoother performance, especially when gaming or using demanding applications.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Supports 8K recording for high-quality video capture, a professional-level feature absent in the A04e.

Samsung Galaxy A04e Advantages:

  • Significantly Lighter: The A04e is much lighter at 188g vs the Red Magic 6's 220g, improving comfort for prolonged use.
  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery of the A04e will likely provide longer battery life compared to Red Magic 6.
  • Dedicated Cameras: A04e includes both standard and selfie cameras, alongside other features like face detection, autofocus, etc. These are absent in the Red Magic 6.
  • More Sensors: The A04e includes proximity and accelerometer sensors.
  • More Modern Software: Comes with Android 12 out of the box, while the Red Magic 6 uses Android 11.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Red Magic 6: Sacrifices camera features and potential battery life for vastly superior display and performance. It also may be less comfortable due to its larger size and weight.
  • Galaxy A04e: Trades performance and display quality for a lighter design, good battery life, and basic camera functionality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 Ideal User:

  • Hardcore Mobile Gamers: The 165Hz refresh rate and Snapdragon 888 chipset make this phone ideal for demanding games.
  • Media Enthusiasts: The AMOLED screen is great for movies, shows, and other visual content.
  • Users Prioritizing Performance: Individuals who value raw power and smooth multitasking will prefer the Red Magic 6.
  • Users who don't care about taking photos.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Playing graphics-intensive games at high frame rates.
  • Watching high-resolution videos with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
  • Multitasking between resource-heavy apps without lag.
  • Professional-level videography

Samsung Galaxy A04e Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: A04e prioritizes basic functionality and value.
  • Casual Users: Ideal for users who primarily browse the web, use social media, and make calls.
  • Users Prioritizing Battery Life: The larger battery makes it suitable for all-day usage.
  • Users needing a basic camera: The cameras offer acceptable photo and video quality for casual use.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Everyday smartphone tasks such as web browsing, social media, and calls.
  • Long-lasting battery for users who are often away from charging points.
  • Basic photography needs for general social media posts.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Red Magic 6 offers more high-end features for users focused on specific aspects of smartphone usage such as gaming and video recording.
  • The Galaxy A04e offers a more balanced basic approach at a lower price point.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your primary use case? (Gaming, photography, daily use, multimedia etc).
  2. Which is more important for you: performance and display quality or battery life and camera features?
  3. What is your budget?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Gamers: If gaming is the primary use, the Red Magic 6 with its high refresh rate display and Snapdragon 888 is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 2: General Use with Budget: If the user needs a reliable device for daily tasks and has budget constraints, the Galaxy A04e will meet these needs.
  • Scenario 3: Media Consumption: If a user consumes lots of media, the Red Magic 6's AMOLED screen will offer superior picture quality and a more enjoyable experience.
  • Scenario 4: Photography: If capturing photos and videos is an important aspect of a smartphone, the Galaxy A04e has cameras that the Red Magic 6 lacks.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the ZTE nubia Red Magic 6, but it strongly depends on the use case. Here's why:

  • I prioritize performance and display quality. I often play mobile games and watch videos. The 165Hz AMOLED display and Snapdragon 888 are hard to ignore. The Red Magic 6 is specifically designed for those use cases.
  • I can work around the camera limitations. While I do take photos occasionally, it's not a top priority. If I needed good cameras, this choice might not be for me.
  • I am ok with the heavier design. The Red Magic 6 is bulkier, but the benefits to my use case outweigh this inconvenience.

The Galaxy A04e is a solid budget phone, but it does not match my needs. The Red Magic 6 is designed with mobile gaming as a main focus, and that's why it would be my choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.