ZTE Blade V60 Design vs Samsung Galaxy A06 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 1, 2024 August 22, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.33 cm³ 103.46 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 198 g 189 g
Height 164.2 mm 167.3 mm
Width 75.3 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet
  • Gold
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 267 PPI 262 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.02 mAh/cm³ 48.33 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureZTE Blade V60 DesignSamsung Galaxy A06Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm167.3 x 77.3 x 8 mmGalaxy A06 is slightly larger and wider.
Weight198g189gBlade V60 is noticeably heavier.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Size6.6"6.7"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzPLS LCDBlade V60's 90Hz refresh rate offers smoother scrolling and animations compared to the standard 60Hz expected on the A06.
Resolution720 x 1612720 x 1600Virtually identical sharpness; both are low-resolution for their size.
Peak BrightnessNot specifiedNot specifiedOutdoor visibility in bright sunlight cannot be compared.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)Helio G85 generally offers slightly better CPU performance, particularly in multi-core tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)A06's higher clocked CPU cores suggest better performance in demanding applications.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 MC2 generally offers better gaming performance than the Mali-G57 MP1.
RAM6GB6GBSame RAM capacity should provide similar multitasking capabilities.
Storage256GB128GBBlade V60 offers double the storage, beneficial for users who store lots of media.
Software
OSAndroid 13Android 14A06 ships with a newer Android version and is promised updates to Android 16, offering longer software support and potentially new features.
Other
NFCYesNoBlade V60 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC, A06 does not.
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities, but real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage patterns.
Sensorsaccelerometer, proximity, Fingerprintaccelerometer, proximity, compass, FingerprintBoth have fingerprint sensors; A06 adds a compass which could be useful for navigation.
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fpsA06 can record smoother 60fps video at 1080p.

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Larger Storage: 256GB offers significantly more space for apps, photos, and videos.
  • 90Hz Display: Smoother scrolling and animations compared to a standard 60Hz display.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.

Samsung Galaxy A06 Advantages:

  • Slightly Better Performance: The Helio G85 chipset and faster CPU cores in the A06 likely provide a performance edge in demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Newer Software: Android 14 with guaranteed updates to Android 16 provides a longer software lifespan and access to newer features.
  • 60fps Video Recording: Enables smoother video capture.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

ZTE Blade V60 Design: Suitable for users who prioritize storage space, a smooth display experience, and utilize NFC for payments or data transfer. Good for media consumption and general usage.

Samsung Galaxy A06: Ideal for users who want slightly better performance for gaming or demanding apps and value longer software update support. Good for budget-conscious users who prioritize performance over extensive storage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is storage space? If you need ample storage for apps, photos, and videos, the Blade V60's 256GB is a significant advantage.
  2. Do you prioritize software updates? If you want the latest Android features and security patches for a longer period, the A06 is the better choice.
  3. Is NFC essential? If you rely on contactless payments or data transfer, the Blade V60 is the only option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Casual User: Either phone could be suitable depending on individual priorities regarding storage vs. software updates.
  • Gamer on a Budget: The Galaxy A06's slightly better performance makes it a better choice for gaming.
  • Heavy Media Consumer: The Blade V60's larger storage is crucial for storing large media files.
  • Prioritizes Mobile Payments: The Blade V60 is the only option with NFC.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.