ZTE Blade A75 4G vs ZTE nubia Red Magic 9S Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2024 July 9, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.97 cm³ 111.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 189 g 229 g
Height 164.1 mm 164 mm
Width 75.8 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White
  • Design Sleet (Black Version)
  • Snowfall (Silver Version)
  • Cyclone (Transparent Black Version)
  • Frost (White Version)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.8 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 89.1 %
Pixel Density 267 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 140.57 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.74 mAh/cm³ 58.29 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 750 (1 GHz)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort, Accessory Connector

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureZTE Blade A75 4GZTE nubia Red Magic 9S ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.1x75.8x8.6mm164x76.4x8.9mmNegligible size difference in hand.
Weight189g229gRed Magic 9S Pro is noticeably heavier. Can impact comfort during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedMaterial differences can impact durability and premium feel. Unable to compare without details.
Display
Size6.6"6.8"Slightly larger screen on the Red Magic 9S Pro offers more immersive content consumption.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzAMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzRed Magic 9S Pro boasts superior display technology with vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED and higher refresh rate.
Resolution720x1612 (267 ppi)1116x2480 (400 ppi)Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the Red Magic 9S Pro due to higher resolution and pixel density.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1600 nitsRed Magic 9S Pro offers exceptional outdoor visibility even in direct sunlight. Blade A75's unspecified brightness may be insufficient in bright conditions.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)Vastly superior performance on the Red Magic 9S Pro. Expect significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and capable gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Red Magic 9S Pro's CPU offers flagship-level processing power, while the Blade A75 is geared towards basic tasks.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 750 (1 GHz)Red Magic 9S Pro provides a significantly better gaming and graphics-intensive task experience. Expect higher frame rates and detailed visuals in games.
RAM4GB16GBRed Magic 9S Pro allows for seamless multitasking and effortless switching between numerous apps. Blade A75's 4GB RAM might lead to performance limitations with multiple apps open.
Storage256GB512GBMore storage space on the Red Magic 9S Pro for apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh6500 mAhLarger battery capacity in the Red Magic 9S Pro potentially translates to longer usage time.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedUnable to compare charging speeds without specific details.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps8K@30fps, 4K@ various fps, 1080p at various fpsRed Magic 9S Pro offers significantly better video recording capabilities including higher resolution and frame rate options. No details on photo capabilities for comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Expected to be significantly more affordable.
  • Lighter Weight: Easier to hold and carry for extended periods.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 9S Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: Flagship chipset, ample RAM, and powerful GPU offer a smooth and responsive experience for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • High-Quality Display: AMOLED with high refresh rate and brightness provides vibrant visuals and smooth scrolling.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Capable of recording high-resolution videos at various frame rates.
  • More Storage: 512GB provides ample space for apps, media, and files.

Trade-offs:

  • The Red Magic 9S Pro's superior performance and features come at a significantly higher price and increased weight.
  • The Blade A75 prioritizes affordability but compromises on performance, display quality, and features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

ZTE Blade A75 4G:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light app usage.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, social media browsing, casual web browsing.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 9S Pro:

  • Ideal User: Power users, gamers, and multimedia enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance, a high-quality display, and advanced features.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, video editing, content creation, multitasking, enjoying high-quality multimedia.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Blade A75 is a budget option, while the Red Magic 9S Pro is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important are display quality and performance? The Red Magic 9S Pro excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Demanding User, High Budget: ZTE nubia Red Magic 9S Pro
  • Moderate Budget, Desire for Good Performance: Consider other mid-range options that offer a balance between price and performance. Look for devices with at least 6GB RAM and a more powerful chipset than the Unisoc T606. Further research is needed beyond these two models.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.