ZTE Blade A75 4G vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2024 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 106.97 cm³ 88.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.49 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 189 g 199 g
Height 164.1 mm 149.6 mm
Width 75.8 mm 71.5 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Natural Titanium
  • Desert Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.3 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 1206 x 2622
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.1 % 90.9 %
Pixel Density 267 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 90.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.74 mAh/cm³ 40.35 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3582 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 13 18
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

ZTE Blade A75 4G vs. Apple iPhone 16 Pro: A Practical Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the ZTE Blade A75 4G and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro. While these phones occupy vastly different price points and target audiences, understanding their strengths and weaknesses can illuminate what matters most in a smartphone.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureZTE Blade A75 4GApple iPhone 16 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions164.1x75.8x8.6mm149.6x71.5x8.3mmiPhone 16 Pro is noticeably smaller and more pocketable.
Weight189g199gNegligible difference in weight for most users.
Build Material(Not specified)(Assumed) Glass & MetaliPhone 16 Pro likely offers a more premium feel and durability.
Display
Size6.6"6.3"A75 offers a larger screen for media consumption; iPhone 16 Pro is more one-handed friendly.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzLTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120HziPhone 16 Pro boasts superior color accuracy, contrast, and smoothness.
Resolution720x16121206x2622iPhone 16 Pro delivers significantly sharper visuals.
PPI Density267460Much sharper text and images on the iPhone 16 Pro.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzSmoother scrolling and animations on the iPhone 16 Pro.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)iPhone 16 Pro will offer drastically faster performance in all tasks.
CPUOcta-coreHexa-coreiPhone 16 Pro's CPU is designed for high-intensity applications and multitasking.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Apple GPU (6-core)Significantly better gaming and graphics performance on the iPhone 16 Pro.
RAM4GB8GBMore headroom for multitasking on the iPhone 16 Pro.
Storage256GB256GB, 512GB, 1TBMore storage options available on the iPhone 16 Pro.
Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity5000mAh3582 mAhA75 likely offers longer battery life; real-world usage will vary.
Charging Speed(Not specified)(Not specified)Insufficient data for comparison.
Other Features
OSAndroid 13iOS 18Different operating systems cater to different user preferences.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPortFaster data transfer and display output on iPhone 16 Pro.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Disparity: The iPhone 16 Pro, powered by the A18 Pro chip, will deliver a vastly superior performance compared to the ZTE Blade A75 4G. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a significantly better gaming experience.
  • Display Quality: The iPhone 16 Pro's OLED display with a higher resolution, refresh rate, and HDR support will offer a richer, more vibrant visual experience. The A75's LCD panel is functional but lacks the same level of clarity and color accuracy.
  • Battery Life Trade-off: While the A75 boasts a larger battery capacity, the iPhone 16 Pro's energy-efficient processor and software optimizations could potentially deliver comparable battery life despite the smaller battery. Real-world usage will be the determining factor.
  • Software Ecosystem: The choice between Android and iOS often boils down to personal preference. Android offers more customization options, while iOS is known for its simplicity and tighter integration with Apple's ecosystem.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality like calling, texting, web browsing, and casual media consumption.
  • Apple iPhone 16 Pro: Power users, content creators, and gamers who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The A75 is a budget-friendly option, while the iPhone 16 Pro sits at the premium end of the market.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For basic tasks, the A75 is sufficient. For demanding applications and gaming, the iPhone 16 Pro is the clear winner.
  3. Which operating system do you prefer? Consider your familiarity and comfort level with Android and iOS.

In conclusion, the ZTE Blade A75 4G and Apple iPhone 16 Pro cater to drastically different needs and budgets. The A75 provides essential smartphone features at an affordable price, while the iPhone 16 Pro offers a cutting-edge mobile experience without compromise. Choosing the right phone depends on your individual priorities and how you intend to use your device.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.