Alright, let's dive deep into this comparison between the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. It's clear from the get-go that these phones target very different user segments, so we’ll break it down to help you figure out which one fits your needs.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed look at their key specifications, with a focus on what it means for you:
Design
| Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm | 164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm | The A75 4G is slightly wider and thicker, making the Axon 40 Ultra a bit more pocketable. |
| Weight | 204g | 189g | The A75 4G is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. |
| Build | Standard | Standard | Both are standard, non-foldable phones |
Display
| Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.8" | 6.6" | The Axon 40 Ultra offers a slightly larger screen, providing a more immersive viewing experience. |
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 | 720 x 1612 | The Axon 40 Ultra is significantly sharper; text and images will look clearer and more detailed. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 400 | 267 | The Axon 40 Ultra’s higher PPI means crisper images and text, making it easier on the eyes. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | AMOLED offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors, especially noticeable in dark mode and when watching videos. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | The Axon 40 Ultra will have smoother animations and transitions, making scrolling feel more fluid. |
| Brightness | 1500 nits | 0 nits | The Axon 40 Ultra is dramatically brighter and much easier to use in direct sunlight. |
Performance
| Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) | Unisoc T606 (12nm) | The Axon 40 Ultra has a much more powerful chipset. It handles demanding tasks, such as gaming and video editing, much faster and smoother. |
| Antutu Score | 1,061,300 | 240,000 | The Axon 40 Ultra’s benchmark score is more than four times higher, indicating drastically better performance across all applications. |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G57 MP1 | The Axon 40 Ultra’s GPU is much better for graphics-intensive tasks, including gaming and video processing. |
Camera
| Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 64MP, f/1.6, Sony IMX787 | 50MP, f/1.8 | The Axon 40 Ultra captures higher-resolution photos with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and detail. |
| Selfie Camera | 16MP, f/2.0 | 8MP | The Axon 40 Ultra’s selfie camera captures more detailed images. |
| Telephoto Lens | 64MP, f/3.5, Omnivision OV64B | N/A | The Axon 40 Ultra has a dedicated telephoto lens for better zoomed-in photos, which is absent in the Blade A75 4G. |
| ToF 3D Sensor | 0.3MP | N/A | The Axon 40 Ultra has a ToF 3D sensor to improve depth information. |
| Wide Angle + Macro | 64MP, f/2.3, Sony IMX787 | N/A | The Axon 40 Ultra can take wide angle and macro shots, while the Blade A75 4G does not. |
| Video | Up to 8K@30fps with HDR, EIS | 1080p@30fps | The Axon 40 Ultra offers professional-grade video recording capabilities. |
| Features | 4K/8K Video, Optical Zoom, OIS, etc | Digital Zoom, PDAF, etc. | The Axon 40 Ultra offers a much broader array of advanced camera features. |
Battery Life
| Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both phones offer similar battery capacity, meaning you’ll get comparable battery life under average usage. |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging | 22.5W Fast Charging | The Axon 40 Ultra charges significantly faster, getting you back up and running quicker. |
| Removable | Non-removable | Non-removable | Both phones do not have a removable battery |
Connectivity & Software
| Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | The Axon 40 Ultra supports faster, more efficient Wi-Fi connections. |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 | The Axon 40 Ultra uses a newer Bluetooth version, offering slightly better performance and power efficiency. |
| GPS | GPS (L1+L5) | GPS | The Axon 40 Ultra uses advanced GPS for better location accuracy. |
| Operating System | Android 12 (upgradeable to 13) | Android 13 | The Blade A75 4G ships with a newer version of Android, but the Axon 40 Ultra may receive further updates. |
Other Notable Features
| Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Storage | Up to 1TB | Up to 256GB | The Axon 40 Ultra offers significantly more storage for all your files and apps. |
| RAM | Up to 18GB | Up to 8GB | The Axon 40 Ultra handles much heavier multitasking and app switching. |
| Audio | Stereo Speakers, 3 Microphones | DTS / DTS X | The Axon 40 Ultra has a more immersive audio experience. |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Basic In-display | Side-mounted | The Blade A75 4G has a more modern and likely faster sensor |
| Sensors | Comprehensive set | Standard set | The Axon 40 Ultra is more advanced and suitable for advanced features and gaming |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone can have their storage expanded |
2. Key Insights
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: The Powerhouse
- Strengths: The Axon 40 Ultra is a high-performance flagship with an emphasis on top-tier performance, premium display, and advanced camera features. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset paired with lots of RAM handles everything you throw at it smoothly. The display is significantly better, offering a vibrant and sharp visual experience. The camera system, with multiple 64MP lenses, including telephoto and ultrawide capabilities, enables professional-grade photography and videography.
- Competitive Advantages: It excels in scenarios demanding speed, display quality, and camera performance. The significantly faster charging is also a major plus, ensuring you're not tethered to an outlet for long. The additional features like the under-display camera, 8K video recording, and stereo speakers make the Axon 40 Ultra a top contender in the premium category.
- Limitations: The Axon 40 Ultra lacks expandable storage, which might concern some users. It's also a heavier device, and the older OS version, although upgradable, is worth noting.
ZTE Blade A75 4G: The Budget-Friendly Option
- Strengths: The Blade A75 4G is designed as a budget-friendly phone that still offers essential smartphone features. It's lightweight and has a decent battery capacity for day-to-day usage.
- Competitive Advantages: Its main advantage is affordability. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor is also a more modern and convenient feature.
- Limitations: Performance-wise, it significantly lags behind the Axon 40 Ultra, which affects gaming and multitasking. The lower-resolution display and basic camera setup are also notable compromises.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:
- Best For: Power users, tech enthusiasts, photographers, and videographers who demand the best performance, display quality, and camera capabilities. It's excellent for gamers and professionals who need a reliable phone for demanding tasks.
- Use Cases: Gaming, professional photography/videography, heavy multitasking, media consumption, and any situation where speed and visual quality are critical.
ZTE Blade A75 4G:
- Best For: Budget-conscious users, students, or anyone who needs a reliable phone for everyday use without breaking the bank. It's suitable for light browsing, social media, and casual photography.
- Use Cases: Basic communication, social media, light web browsing, and casual photography. It's a dependable daily driver that covers the essentials.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to help guide your decision:
- How important is performance and speed for you? If you regularly engage in gaming or multitasking, the Axon 40 Ultra is the clear choice.
- What kind of display quality do you prefer? If you prioritize a sharp, vibrant display with excellent visibility, the Axon 40 Ultra’s AMOLED panel is much better.
- How much do you value advanced camera features and higher-quality photography/videography? The Axon 40 Ultra excels here, offering multiple high-resolution lenses and advanced features.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- The Gamer: Go for the Axon 40 Ultra. Its superior chipset, GPU, high refresh rate, and RAM will ensure a smooth gaming experience.
- The Budget User: The Blade A75 4G is a great choice for basic functionality with a more affordable price tag.
- The Photographer: The Axon 40 Ultra, with its versatile triple-camera setup, optical zoom, and better low-light capabilities, is much better suited.
- The Casual User: If you’re a casual user who primarily uses their phone for social media and light tasks, the Blade A75 4G is a more practical option.
My Choice and Why
If I had to choose between these two phones, I'd go with the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. My preference leans towards high performance, superior display quality, and excellent camera capabilities. As someone who uses their phone for a variety of demanding tasks, from photography and video editing to gaming, the Axon 40 Ultra’s flagship features are worth the investment. The incredible display is a treat for the eyes, and the camera’s versatility is something I would utilize on a daily basis. While the Blade A75 4G is a decent budget option, the significant compromises in performance and display are deal-breakers for me. For me, the Axon 40 Ultra's advanced features and capabilities make it the clear choice, aligning perfectly with my requirements.
