Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+. These two phones pack quite different punches, and it’s crucial to see how their specs translate into real-world performance.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here’s a detailed breakdown of the key specifications, focusing on what they mean for you, the user:
Feature | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Launch Date | 2022-05-13 | 2022-11-01 | The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is newer by about 5.5 months, potentially benefiting from more recent tech advancements. |
Form Factor | Standard | Standard | Both are traditional smartphones, not foldable. |
Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm | The Axon is slightly taller and less wide, while the Redmi is a bit thicker, making the Redmi larger overall volume. |
Weight | 204g | 208.4g | Both phones are roughly the same weight, comfortable to hold but noticeable in pockets. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.8" | 6.67" | The Axon has a larger screen for a more immersive viewing experience. |
Resolution | 1116 x 2480 | 1080 x 2400 | The Axon has a slightly sharper display with more detail. |
Pixel Density | 400 PPI | 395 PPI | Both have similar pixel density, making for sharp and clear text and images |
Technology | AMOLED | OLED | Both use vibrant display tech; color reproduction should be excellent |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both displays are fluid, smooth scrolling, and animations will feel very responsive |
Brightness | 1500 nits | 900 nits | The Axon’s display is significantly brighter, making it far easier to see in bright sunlight. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Dimensity 1080 | The Axon’s Snapdragon chip is considerably more powerful, suitable for high-performance tasks like gaming and video editing |
AnTuTu Score | 1,061,300 | 573,100 | The Axon demonstrates much higher performance in benchmarks, suggesting faster loading times and smoother multitasking. |
GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G68 MC4 | The Axon's Adreno GPU will give better gaming performance. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 64MP (f/1.6) | 200MP (f/1.65) | The Redmi’s main camera has higher resolution for larger and detailed photos, but the Axon has a wider aperture letting in more light. |
Selfie Camera | 16MP (f/2.0) | 16MP (f/2.45) | The Axon’s front camera has a wider aperture, which is beneficial for better low-light selfies. |
Telephoto Lens | 64MP | None | The Axon has an additional telephoto lens offering optical zoom, while the Redmi lacks this feature. |
Wide Angle Lens | None | 8MP | The Redmi has an ultrawide lens for capturing expansive landscapes, while the Axon lacks one. |
ToF 3D Sensor | 0.3MP | None | The Axon has a Time-of-Flight sensor, potentially improving autofocus and depth information. |
Macro Lens | None | 2MP | The Redmi has a macro lens for extreme close-up photography, while the Axon lacks it. |
Wide Angle + Macro | 64MP | None | The Axon has a wide + macro lens, combining two functions, while Redmi lacks it. |
Video Recording | Up to 8K@30fps | Up to 4K@30fps | The Axon can record higher-resolution videos for professional-grade footage, while the Redmi does 4k. |
DxOMark Score | N/A | 113 (Mobile) | The Redmi has been benchmarked in the DxOMark tests, while the Axon has not. This suggests the Redmi has been better tested in the camera department. |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both have a similar battery capacity, providing comparable battery life for daily use. |
Charging | 65W | 120W | The Redmi charges much faster, minimizing downtime. |
Software | |||
OS Version | Android 12, upgrade to 13 | Android 12, upgrade to 14 | The Redmi will have an additional upgrade to the OS. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 128/256/512/1024 GB | 128/256 GB | The Axon offers up to 1TB of storage, accommodating many more photos, videos, and games, while the Redmi has less flexibility. |
RAM | 8/12/16/18 GB | 8/12 GB | The Axon has more RAM options for extreme multitasking and demanding applications. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage, so selecting a model with adequate space is important. |
Audio | |||
Quality | DTS/DTS X, 3 mics | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res | Both have great audio, the ZTE provides DTS sound while the Redmi provides Dolby Atmos. |
Security | |||
Features | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | The Redmi features a more modern side-mounted fingerprint sensor. |
Build Quality | |||
Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | The Redmi has a better-known screen protection with Gorilla Glass. |
2. Key Insights
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Strengths: The Axon is a powerhouse with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor, offering top-tier performance for gaming and heavy multitasking. Its significantly brighter display ensures excellent outdoor visibility. The camera system, with its telephoto lens and advanced video capabilities up to 8K, caters to photography and videography enthusiasts. Also, it has more RAM options and a bigger storage option of 1TB.
- Competitive Advantages: The Axon’s combination of raw power, display brightness, versatile camera system, and storage/RAM options are its major selling points. It's clearly designed for those who want maximum performance and imaging capabilities.
- Trade-offs: Its lacks a wide-angle lens, a macro lens, a side fingerprint sensor, and better screen protection. It has a basic fingerprint sensor, suggesting a potentially less sophisticated security feature.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Strengths: The Redmi’s key advantages are its 120W fast charging, making it a champion of convenience. The 200MP main camera is a significant draw for those who love high-resolution images. It also benefits from Gorilla Glass protection for better screen durability.
- Competitive Advantages: The Redmi’s ultra-fast charging and high-resolution camera appeal to users focused on practicality and great imagery. It is also a more recent phone with more software updates.
- Trade-offs: The Redmi's processor is weaker, meaning it will not handle intensive tasks as well as the Axon. The lower brightness of the display might be an issue in outdoor use, especially on a bright day.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: This phone is perfect for power users, mobile gamers, and content creators. Its top-tier performance and camera features are ideal for those who need a device that can handle everything thrown at it. If you're often in bright conditions or require a professional video recording, this is a strong contender.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+: This phone is tailored to those who prioritize convenience and everyday photography. Its rapid charging and excellent main camera make it a great option for users who want a dependable device without needing the absolute best in raw processing power. It’s a strong choice for frequent travelers and social media enthusiasts.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to help you choose:
Do you prioritize raw performance and gaming?
- If yes, the Axon is the clear choice due to its superior processor and GPU.
Is fast charging a must-have?
- If yes, the Redmi’s 120W charging is a huge advantage, making it a more convenient option for those always on the go.
Are you a photography enthusiast needing a wide range of focal lengths?
- If yes, the Axon offers a telephoto lens, but the Redmi offers an ultrawide. Based on your preference.
Scenario-based recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Frequent Gamer or Video Editor. Recommendation: ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Adreno 730 are built for performance.
- Scenario 2: On-the-Go Professional who needs the phone ready always. Recommendation: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+. 120W charging is a game changer for battery anxiety.
- Scenario 3: Casual User with Focus on Social Media. Recommendation: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+. The high-resolution camera and its versatile lens capabilities suit a casual user very well.
My Choice
If I were to choose, I'd go with the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. While the Redmi's fast charging is incredibly appealing, the Axon's superior processing power, brighter display, better camera lenses and higher storage options align more with my needs. As someone who often uses intensive apps, edits videos, and enjoys mobile gaming, the performance boost is something I value highly. While the lack of wide-angle and macro lenses is unfortunate, the overall package of the Axon better suits my diverse use cases.
By taking the time to break down the specs and consider the real-world implications, you are more empowered to make a choice tailored to your unique needs and lifestyle.